# pdgfootnote

pdgid: M070R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2006V reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma f_2(1270))/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] = 1.371+-0.010+-0.222E-3 which we divide by our best value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3+2.8-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2006V reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma f_2(1270))/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] = 1.200+-0.027+-0.174E-3 which we divide by our best value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3+2.8-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070R86
text:
Estimated using B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)=0.843+-0.012. The errors do not contain the uncertainty in the f_{{2}}(1270) decay.


pdgid: M070R88
text:
Obtained summing the sequential decay channels B(J/psi --> gamma f_1(1285), f_1(1285) --> pi pi pi pi ) = 1.44+-0.39+-0.27E-4; B(J/psi --> gamma f_1(1285), f_1(1285) --> a_0(980) pi, a_0(980) --> eta pi) = 3.90+-0.42+-0.87E-4; B(J/psi --> gamma f_1(1285), f_1(1285) --> a_0(980) pi, a_0(980) --> K Kbar) = 0.66+-0.26+-0.29E-4; B(J/psi --> gamma f_1(1285), f_1(1285) --> gamma rho0) = 0.25+-0.07+-0.03E-4.


pdgid: M070R88
text:
Using B(f_1(1285) --> a_0(980) pi) = 0.37, and including unknown branching ratio for a_0(980) --> eta pi.


pdgid: M070R87
text:
DOBBS 2015 reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma f_2^'(1525))/G(total)] * [B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar)] = 7.09+-0.46+-0.67E-4 which we divide by our best value B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-2.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M070R91
text:
Includes unknown branching fraction to K+ K- or K0S K0S. We have multiplied K+ K- measurement by 2, and K0S K0S by 4 to obtain K Kbar result.


pdgid: M070B02
text:
For Gamma = 20/50 MeV, the 90% CL upper limits for pi+ pi- and pi0 pi0 are 2.6/5.2E-5 and 1.3/1.9E-5, respectively.


pdgid: M070B03
text:
For Gamma = 20/50 MeV, the 90% CL upper limits for K+ K- and K0S K0S are 1.7/3.1E-5 and 1.2/2.0E-5, respectively.


pdgid: M070R78
text:
From a fit of the measured pi+ pi- eta^' lineshape that accounts for the abrupt distortion observed at the p pbar threshold with a Flatte formula in addition to known backgrounds and contributors, as well as an ad hoc Breit-Wigner (M ~~ 1919 MeV; Gamma ~~ 51 MeV) that is required for a good fit. Another explanation for the distortion provided by ABLIKIM 2016J is that a second resonance near 1870 MeV interferes with the X(1835); fits to this possibility yield product branching fraction values compatible with that shown within the respective systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: M070S71
text:
From the fit including final state interaction effects in isospin 0 S-wave according to SIBIRTSEV 2005A.


pdgid: M070P87
text:
Decaying via the intermediate f_0(980) eta^', fitted together with X(1835), a 600 MeV broad structure around 2.8 GeV, and the tail of the eta_{{c}}(1S).


pdgid: M070S68
text:
For a narrow state, A0, with mass mass(A0) < 1.2 GeV. The limit varies with mass(A0),  reaching its largest value of 1.7E-6 at 1.2 GeV and being 7.0E-7 for mass(A0) = 0.


pdgid: M070S68
text:
The limit varies with mass mass(A0) of a narrow state A0 and is 4.3E-6 for mass(A0) = 0 , reaches its largest value of 6.3E-6 at mass(A0) = 500 MeV, and is 3.6E-6 at mass(A0) = 960 MeV.


pdgid: M070Q68
text:
For a light pseudoscalar axion-like particle, A0, with a mass in the range 0.18 -- 2.85 GeV. The measured 95% CL limit as a function of mass(A0) ranges from 3.7E-8 to 4.85E-7.


pdgid: M070Q68
text:
For a light pseudoscalar axion-like particle, A0, with a mass in the range 0.165 -- 2.84 GeV. The measured 95% CL limit as a function of mass(A0) ranges from 8.3E-8 to 1.8E-6.


pdgid: M070S76
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with a mass in the range 0.212 -- 3.0 GeV. The measured 90% CL limit as a function of mass(A0) is in the range (1.2 -- 778.0)xE-9.


pdgid: M070S76
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with a mass in the range 0.212 -- 3 GeV. The measured 90% CL limit as a function of mass(A0) is in the range (2.8 -- 495.3)xE-8.


pdgid: M070S76
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with a mass in the range 0.21 -- 3.00 GeV. The measured 90% CL limit as a function of mass(A0) ranges from 4E-7 to 2.1E-5.


pdgid: M070S90
text:
Approximation of the transition form factor squared as an incoherent sum of the rho-meson and one-pole non-resonant amplitudes gives the pole mass m(Lambda) = 2.56+-0.04+-0.03 GeV. Supersedes ABLIKIM 2014I.


pdgid: M070Q22
text:
Assuming constructive interference. Destructive interference gives a value of 4.43+-0.23+-0.19E-6 for this branching fraction.


pdgid: M070P42
text:
For a dark photon U with mass between 10 and 2400 MeV. Obtained 90% C.L. limits as a function of mass(U) range from 1.9E-8 to 91.1E-8.


pdgid: M070P61
text:
For a dark photon U with mass between 100 and 2100 MeV. Obtained 90% C.L. limits as a function of mass(U) range from 1.8E-8 to 2.0E-7. The corresponding limits on the branching fraction J/psi --> eta^' U range from 5.7E-8 to 7.4E-7.


pdgid: M070R80
text:
WICHT 2008 reports [G(J/psi(1S) --> gamma gamma)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+)] < 0.16E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> J/psi(1S) K+) = 1.020E-3.


pdgid: M070Q69
text:
For a light scalar, X0, with a mass in the range 1 -- 1000 MeV. The measured limit at the 90% credibility level as a function of mass(X0) ranges from 6.2E-9 to 5.5E-7.


pdgid: M070Q69
text:
For a light vector, X0, with a mass in the range 1 -- 1000 MeV. The measured limit at the 90% credibility level as a function of mass(X0) ranges from 4.5E-9 to 9.6E-7.


pdgid: M056M
text:
From a fit of the phi phi invariant mass with the width of chi_{{c0}}(1P) fixed to the PDG 2016 value.


pdgid: M056M
text:
Mass value shifted by us by amount appropriate for psi(2S) mass = 3686 MeV and J/psi(1S) mass = 3097 MeV.


pdgid: M056G3
text:
We multiplied the measurement by 3 to convert from pi0 pi0 to pi pi. Interference with the continuum included.


pdgid: M056P08
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BT reports 2.127+-0.002+-0.101 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R24
text:
ABLIKIM 2004G reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(980) f_0(980))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 6.5+-1.6+-1.3E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R62
text:
HE 2008B reports 3.54+-0.10+-0.43+-0.18 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R63
text:
HE 2008B reports 3.04+-0.18+-0.42+-0.16 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> rho+ pi- pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R63
text:
Calculated by us. We have added the values from HE 2008B for rho+ pi- pi0 and rho- pi+ pi0 decays assuming uncorrelated statistical and fully correlated systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: M056R71
text:
ABLIKIM 2011A reports 3.34+-0.06+-0.44E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> 4pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R36
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports 10.44+-2.37+3.05-1.90E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K_0^*(1430)0 Kbar_0^*(1430)0 --> pi+ pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R37
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports 8.49+-1.66+1.32-1.99E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K_0^*(1430)0 Kbar_2^*(1430)0 + c.c. --> pi+ pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R38
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports 6.66+-1.31+1.60-1.51E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K_1(1270)+ K- + c.c. --> pi+ pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. The measurement assumes B(K_1(1270) --> K rho(770)) = 42+-6%.


pdgid: M056R39
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports <2.85E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K_1(1400)+ K- + c.c. --> pi+ pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2. The measurement assumes B(K_1(1400) --> K^*(892) pi) = 94+-6%.


pdgid: M056R28
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(980) f_0(980))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 1.59+-0.50+0.89-0.72E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. One of the f_{{0}}(980) mesons is identified via decay to pi+ pi- while the other via K+ K- decay.


pdgid: M056R29
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports 8.42+-1.42+1.65-2.29E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(980) f_0(2200))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. The f_{{0}}() mesons are identified via f_0(980) --> pi+ pi- and f_0(2200) --> K+ K- decays.


pdgid: M056R30
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports <2.9E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(1370) f_0(1370))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2. One of the f_{{0}}(1370) mesons is identified via decay to pi+ pi- while the other via K+ K- decay. Both branching fractions for these f_{{0}}() decays are implicitly included in the quoted result.


pdgid: M056R31
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports <1.8E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(1370) f_0(1500))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2. The f_{{0}}() mesons are identified via f_0(1370) --> pi+ pi- and f_0(1500) --> K+ K- decays. Both branching fractions for these f_{{0}}() decays are implicitly included in the quoted result.


pdgid: M056R32
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports 7.12+-1.85+3.28-1.68E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(1370) f_0(1710))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. The f_{{0}}() mesons are identified via f_0(1370) --> pi+ pi- and f_0(1710) --> K+ K- decays. Both branching fractions for these f_{{0}}() decays are implicitly included in the quoted result.


pdgid: M056R33
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports <1.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(1500) f_0(1370))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2. The f_{{0}}() mesons are identified via f_0(1500) --> pi+ pi- and f_0(1370) --> K+ K- decays. Both branching fractions for these f_{{0}}() decays are implicitly included in the quoted result.


pdgid: M056R34
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports <0.55E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(1500) f_0(1500))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2. One of the f_{{0}}(1500) is identified via decay to pi+ pi- while the other via K+ K- decay. Both branching fractions for these f_{{0}}() decays are implicitly included in the quoted result.


pdgid: M056R35
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports <0.73E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> f_0(1500) f_0(1710))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2. The f_{{0}}() mesons are identified via f_0(1500) --> pi+ pi- and f_0(1710) --> K+ K- decays. Both branching fractions for these f_{{0}}() decays are implicitly included in the quoted result.


pdgid: M056R64
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.59+-0.05+-0.08+-0.03 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ K- pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R66
text:
HE 2008B reports 2.64+-0.15+-0.31+-0.14 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R67
text:
HE 2008B reports 1.28+-0.16+-0.15+-0.07 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> rho+ K- K0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R68
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.49+-0.10+-0.07+-0.03 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K^*(892)- K+ pi0 --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R47
text:
ABLIKIM 2005O reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K0S K0S pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 0.558+-0.051+-0.089E-3 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R69
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.32+-0.05+-0.05+-0.02 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ K- eta pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2022Q reports 2.080+-0.006+-0.068E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.2E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R4
text:
Rescaled by us using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0())= (9.4+-0.4)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.6+-0.5)%.


pdgid: M056R26
text:
ABLIKIM 2005Q reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 0.168+-0.035+0.047-0.040E-3 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R26
text:
ABLIKIM 2004H reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 1.53+-0.29+-0.26E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R03
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AI reports 8.92+-0.84+-0.65E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> eta eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.99+-0.27E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R03
text:
ASNER 2009 reports <0.25E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> eta eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R03
text:
Superseded by ASNER 2009. ADAMS 2007 reports <0.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> eta eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R04
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AI reports 2.19+-0.03+-0.14E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> eta^' eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.99+-0.27E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R04
text:
ASNER 2009 reports 2.12+-0.13+-0.21E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> eta^' eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R04
text:
Superseded by ASNER 2009. ADAMS 2007 reports 1.7+-0.4+-0.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> eta^' eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 0.0922+-0.0011+-0.0046, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R27
text:
ABLIKIM 2011K reports 0.95+-0.03+-0.11E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> omega omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R27
text:
ABLIKIM 2005N reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> omega omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 0.212+-0.053+-0.037E-3 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2019J reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 13.83+-0.70+-1.01E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2011K reports 1.2+-0.1+-0.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R08
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports <0.21E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R08
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R reports <1.1E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R51
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports <0.38E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R17
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports <0.10E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R17
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R reports <0.70E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R05
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports <0.06E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R09
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports <0.24E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ K- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R48
text:
ABLIKIM 2005O reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ K- K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 0.138+-0.039+-0.025E-3 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R95
text:
Using B(K0S --> pi+ pi-) = (69.20+-0.05)%. ABLIKIM 2019AA reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K0S K0S K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 5.64+-0.33+-0.37E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value..


pdgid: M056R01
text:
ABLIKIM 2006T reports 1.03+-0.22+-0.15E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ K- phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R16
text:
Measured using B( psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P) ) = 9.75+-0.24E-2 and B( phi --> K+ K- ) = 49.2+-0.5E-2 from PDG 2022.


pdgid: M056R98
text:
ABLIKIM 2020B reports 8.41+-0.74+-0.62E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> phi phi eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R06
text:
ONYISI 2010 reports 7.76+-0.37+-0.51+-0.39E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R06
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 0.59+-0.10+-0.08E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R50
text:
ONYISI 2010 reports 3.73+-0.38+-0.28+-0.19E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R50
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 0.39+-0.11+-0.04E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R70
text:
ONYISI 2010 reports 5.57+-0.48+-0.42+-0.14E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R75
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports 6.12+-1.18+-0.86E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R65
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.11+-0.02+-0.02+-0.01 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R72
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports 1.24+-0.20+-0.18E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar K+ K- (non-resonant))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R49
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p nbar pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 1.26+-0.02+-0.11E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R49
text:
ABLIKIM 2006I reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p nbar pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 1.10+-0.24+-0.18E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R82
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> pbar n pi+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 1.34+-0.03+-0.11E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R83
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> p nbar pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 2.29+-0.08+-0.18E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R84
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> pbar n pi+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 2.16+-0.07+-0.16E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R44
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports 119.0+-6.4+-11.4E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Lambda Lambdabar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R77
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <54E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Lambda Lambdabar pi+ pi- (non-resonant))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R78
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <55E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma(1385)+ Lambdabar pi- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R79
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <50E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma(1385)- Lambdabar pi+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R07
text:
ABLIKIM 2013D reports 1.32+-0.03+-0.10E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R07
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 1.07+-0.17+-0.12E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R99
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AU reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K^*(892)+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 4.7+-0.7+-0.5E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R73
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports 3.00+-0.58+-0.50E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda(1520) + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056P02
text:
ABLIKIM 2021AV reports 6.65+-0.26+-0.41E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> n K0S Lambdabar + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 0.0979+-0.0020, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Also uses B( Lambdabar --> pbar pi+ ) = (63.9+-0.5)% and B( K0S --> pi+ pi- ) = (69.20+-0.05)%.


pdgid: M056R74
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports 3.18+-1.11+-0.53E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Lambda(1520) Lambdabar(1520))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R59
text:
ABLIKIM 2018V reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 4.72+-0.18+-0.28E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R59
text:
NAIK 2008 reports 4.41+-0.56+-0.47E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R59
text:
ABLIKIM 2013H reports 4.78+-0.34+-0.39E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R60
text:
ABLIKIM 2018V reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 4.99+-0.24+-0.24E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R60
text:
NAIK 2008 reports 3.25+-0.57+-0.43E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R60
text:
ABLIKIM 2013H reports 4.54+-0.42+-0.30E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056P12
text:
ABLIKIM 2024CA reports 12.6+-2.0+-1.3E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056P00
text:
ABLIKIM 2020I reports 5.13+-0.24+-0.41E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma- Sigmabar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R80
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports 16.4+-5.7+-1.6E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma(1385)+ Sigmabar(1385)-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R81
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports 23.5+-6.2+-2.3E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Sigma(1385)- Sigmabar(1385)+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.68+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R92
text:
ABLIKIM 2015I reports [G(chi_c0(1P) --> K- Lambda Xibar+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] = 1.90+-0.30+-0.16E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R61
text:
ABLIKIM 2022O reports 4.67+-0.19+-0.26E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Xi0 Xibar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.2E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R61
text:
NAIK 2008 reports 3.34+-0.70+-0.48E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Xi0 Xibar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R45
text:
ABLIKIM 2022O reports 4.43+-0.08+-0.18E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Xi- Xibar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.79+-0.2E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R45
text:
NAIK 2008 reports 5.14+-0.60+-0.47E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> Xi- Xibar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R56
text:
BENNETT 2008A reports <9.6E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma rho0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R56
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E reports <10.5E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma rho0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R57
text:
BENNETT 2008A reports <8.8E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R57
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E reports <12.9E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R58
text:
BENNETT 2008A reports <6.4E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R58
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E reports <16.2E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.62+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M056R93
text:
ABLIKIM 2017I reports 1.51+-0.30+-0.13E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c0(1P) --> e+ e- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.99+-0.27E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M056R94
text:
Uses B( psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P) ) x B( chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S) ) = 15.8+-0.3+-0.6E-4 from ABLIKIM 2017N and accounts for common systematic errors.


pdgid: M056R18
text:
The values of B(p pbar)B(gamma gamma) and B(gamma gamma)B(gamma J/psi) measured by ANDREOTTI 2004 are not independent. The latter is used in the fit because of smaller systematics.


pdgid: M056R19
text:
Values in (G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar) * G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))/G(total)) and ([G(chi_c0(1P) --> p pbar)/G(total) * G(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))/G(total)]) are not independent. The latter is used in the fit since it is less correlated to the total width.


pdgid: M056B4
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c0() --> 2pi+ 2pi-) reported in BAI 1999B is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.3+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M056B4
text:
The value B(psi(1S) --> gamma chi_c0())xB(chi_c0() --> 2pi+ 2pi-) reported in TANENBAUM 1978 is derived using B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)xB(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) =(4.6+-0.7)%. Calculated by us using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.1181+-0.0020.


pdgid: M056P09
text:
Calculated by us. The value given here is derived from the value of B(chi_c0() --> 2(pi+ pi-)) reported in ABLIKIM 2024BT using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.79+-0.20)% [PDG 2022].


pdgid: M056B19
text:
The reported value is derived using B(psi(2S) --> pi+ pi- J/psi) x B(J/psi --> lepton+ lepton-) = (4.6+-0.7)%. Calculated by us using B(J/psi --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.1181+-0.0020.


pdgid: M056B22
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2010A reports B(chi_c0() --> pi0 pi0) = 3.23+-0.03+-0.23+-0.14E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.4+-0.4)%. We have multiplied the pi0 pi0 measurement by 3 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M056B22
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c0() --> pi+ pi-) = 6.37+-0.08+-0.31+-0.32E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0() ) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)%. We have multiplied the pi+ pi- measurement by 3/2 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M056B22
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c0() --> pi0 pi0) = 2.94+-0.07+-0.32+-0.15E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0() ) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)%. We have multiplied the pi0 pi0 measurement by 3 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M056B5
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c0() --> pi+ pi-) reported in BAI 1998I is derived using B(psi^' --> gamma chi_c0())= (9.3+-0.8)% and B(psi^' --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D]. We have multiplied pi+ pi- measurement by 3/2 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M056B11
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2010A reports B(chi_c0() --> eta eta) = 3.44+-0.10+-0.24+-0.13E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.4+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M056B11
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c0() --> eta eta) = 3.18+-0.13+-0.31+-0.16E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0() ) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)%.


pdgid: M056B11
text:
Superseded by ASNER 2009. Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0(1P) --> eta eta) reported by ADAMS 2007 was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)% (ATHAR 2004).


pdgid: M056B23
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c0() --> K+ K-) = 6.47+-0.08+-0.35+-0.32E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0() ) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)%.


pdgid: M056B9
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c0() --> K+ K-) reported by BAI 1998I is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.3+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M056B12
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c0() --> K0S K0S) = 3.49+-0.08+-0.18+-0.17E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0() ) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)%.


pdgid: M056B13
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0() --> K0S K0S) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.3+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M056B14
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0() --> 2K+ 2K-) reported by ABLIKIM 2006T was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.2+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M056B15
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0() --> 2K+ 2K-) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.3+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M056B16
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0() --> phi phi) reported by ABLIKIM 2011K was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.62+-0.31)%.


pdgid: M056B16
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0() --> phi phi) reported by ABLIKIM 2006T was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.2+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M056B17
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c0() --> phi phi) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = (9.3+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M056B6
text:
Calculated by us. NAIK 2008 reports B(chi_c0() --> p pbar) = 25.7+-1.5+-1.5+-1.3E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)%.


pdgid: M056B1
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c0() --> p pbar) reported in BAI 1998I is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.3+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M056B20
text:
Calculated by us. NAIK 2008 reports B(chi_c0() --> Lambda Lambdabar) = 33.8+-3.6+-2.2+-1.7E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.22+-0.11+-0.46)%.


pdgid: M056B20
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2013H reports B(chi_c0() --> Lambda Lambdabar) = 33.3+-2.0+-2.6E-5 from a measurement of B(chi_c0() --> Lambda Lambdabar) x B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) = (9.62+-0.31)%.


pdgid: M056B21
text:
BAI 2003E reports [ B(chi_c0() --> Lambda Lambdabar) B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()) / B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) ] x [B**2(Lambda --> pi- p) / B(J/psi --> p pbar) ] = (2.45+0.68-0.65+-0.46)%. We calculate from this measurement the presented value using B(Lambda --> pi- p) = (63.9+-0.5)% and B(J/psi --> p pbar) = 2.17+-0.07E-3.


pdgid: M056P07
text:
Calculated by us. The authors report B(chi_c0() --> Lambda Lambdabar omega) obtained from a product using PDG 2022 value of B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0()).


pdgid: M056B24
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2019BB reports B(chi_c0 --> Sigma+ pbar K0S + c.c.) = 3.52+-0.19+-0.21E-4 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0) = (9.79+-0.20)%  and other branching fractions from PDG 2018.


pdgid: M056P01
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2020AE reports B(chi_c0 --> Sigma0 pbar K+ + c.c.) = 3.03+-0.12+-0.15E-4 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0) = (9.79+-0.20)% and other branching fractions from PDG 2020.


pdgid: M055M
text:
From a fit of the phi phi invariant mass with the width of chi_{{c1}}(1P) fixed to the PDG 2016 value.


pdgid: M055R6
text:
ABLIKIM 2022Q reports 1.092+-0.004+-0.035E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R6
text:
Rescaled by us using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = (8.8+-0.4)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.6+-0.5)%.


pdgid: M055R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BT reports 0.685+-0.001+-0.031E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R35
text:
HE 2008B reports 1.28+-0.06+-0.15+-0.08 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R36
text:
HE 2008B reports 1.56+-0.13+-0.22+-0.10 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> rho+ pi- pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R8
text:
Estimated using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 0.087. The errors do not contain the uncertainty in the psi(2S) decay.


pdgid: M055R44
text:
ABLIKIM 2011A reports 0.57+-0.03+-0.08E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> 4pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R37
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.12+-0.02+-0.02+-0.01E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ K- pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R39
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.92+-0.09+-0.11+-0.06 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R40
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.54+-0.11+-0.07+-0.03 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> rho- K+ Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R41
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.25+-0.06+-0.03+-0.02 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar0 pi0 --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R42
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.12+-0.03+-0.02+-0.01 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ K- eta pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R05
text:
ABLIKIM 2005O reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi+ pi- K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 0.67+-0.26+-0.11E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R25
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 0.34+-0.10+-0.04E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ K- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 0.0907+-0.0011+-0.0054, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R09
text:
AAIJ 2023AH reports 1.04+-0.13+-0.04+-0.09E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.)] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.) = 7.0+-0.6E-3.


pdgid: M055R09
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R reports 1.1+-0.4+-0.1E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R10
text:
AAIJ 2023AH reports 1.18+-0.17+-0.14+-0.10E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K^*(892)+ K- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.)] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.) = 7.0+-0.6E-3.


pdgid: M055R10
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R reports 1.6+-0.7+-0.2E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K^*(892)+ K- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R12
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R reports <0.9E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K_J^*(1430)0 Kbar0 + c.c. --> K0S K+ pi- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R13
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R reports <2.4E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K_J^*(1430)+ K- + c.c. --> K0S K+ pi- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R20
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 1.95+-0.16+-0.23E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 0.0907+-0.0011+-0.0054, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R08
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K reports 4.67+-0.03+-0.23+-0.16E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R08
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 5.0+-0.3+-0.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 0.0907+-0.0011+-0.0054, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R08
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R reports 5.9+-0.7+-0.8E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R15
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K reports 3.40+-0.03+-0.19+-0.11E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> a_0(980)+ pi- + c.c. --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R15
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R reports 2.0+-0.5+-0.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> a_0(980)+ pi- + c.c. --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R72
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K reports 0.18+-0.01+-0.02+-0.01E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> a_2(1320)+ pi- + c.c. --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R75
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K reports 4.7+-0.4+-0.6+-0.2E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> a_2(1700)+ pi- + c.c. --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R73
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K reports 0.36+-0.01+-0.06+-0.01E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> f_2(1270) eta --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R74
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K reports 2.6+-0.4+-0.8+-0.1E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> f_4(2050) eta --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R76
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K reports <4.6E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi_1(1400)+ pi- + c.c. --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R77
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K reports <1.5E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi_1(1600)+ pi- + c.c. --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R78
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K reports <8E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi_1(2015)+ pi- + c.c. --> eta pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R16
text:
ABLIKIM 2017K reports 6.4+-1.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> f_2(1270) eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R16
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R reports 3.0+-0.7+-0.5E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> f_2(1270) eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R28
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 2.4+-0.4+-0.3E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta^'())/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 0.0907+-0.0011+-0.0054, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R64
text:
Derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1) = (9.2+-0.4)%. Uncertainty includes both statistical and systematic contributions combined in quadrature.


pdgid: M055R93
text:
AAIJ 2023AH reports 1.61+-0.19+-0.19+-0.14E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K_2^*(1430)+ K- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.)] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.) = 7.0+-0.6E-3.


pdgid: M055R94
text:
AAIJ 2023AH reports 1.17+-0.16+-0.05+-0.10E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K_2^*(1430) Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.)] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.) = 7.0+-0.6E-3.


pdgid: M055R18
text:
ABLIKIM 2011D reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pi0 f_0(980) --> pi0 pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] < 6.0E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R26
text:
ABLIKIM 2004H reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar^*(892)0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 1.40+-0.27+-0.22E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R06
text:
ABLIKIM 2005O reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ K- K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] < 4.2E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R82
text:
Using B(K0S --> pi+ pi-) = (69.20+-0.05)%. ABLIKIM 2019AA reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K0S K0S K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 3.4+-0.9+-0.3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value..


pdgid: M055R07
text:
ABLIKIM 2006T reports 0.46+-0.16+-0.06E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ K- phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R49
text:
ABLIKIM 2011K reports 6.0+-0.3+-0.7E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> omega omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R50
text:
ABLIKIM 2019J reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 2.67+-0.31+-0.27E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R50
text:
ABLIKIM 2011K reports 0.22+-0.06+-0.02E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R51
text:
ABLIKIM 2023N reports 4.26+-0.13+-0.15E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> phi phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R51
text:
ABLIKIM 2011K reports 4.4+-0.3+-0.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> phi phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R85
text:
ABLIKIM 2020B reports 2.96+-0.43+-0.22E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> phi phi eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R21
text:
ONYISI 2010 reports 1.75+-0.16+-0.13+-0.11E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R21
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 1.2+-0.5+-0.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R27
text:
ONYISI 2010 reports 1.56+-0.22+-0.14+-0.10E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R27
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports <0.16E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R43
text:
ONYISI 2010 reports 2.28+-0.28+-0.16+-0.14E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R48
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports <1.82E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R38
text:
HE 2008B reports <0.05E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R45
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports 1.35+-0.15+-0.19E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p pbar K+ K- (non-resonant))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R56
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p nbar pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 0.37+-0.02+-0.04E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R57
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pbar n pi+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 0.38+-0.02+-0.04E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R58
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> p nbar pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 1.00+-0.05+-0.10E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R59
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> pbar n pi+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 0.98+-0.05+-0.10E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R01
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports 31.1+-3.4+-3.9E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Lambda Lambdabar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R19
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports 26.2+-5.5+-3.3E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Lambda Lambdabar pi+ pi- (non-resonant))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R52
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <14E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma(1385)+ Lambdabar pi- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R53
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <14E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma(1385)- Lambdabar pi+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R22
text:
LU 2019 reports 9.15+2.63-2.25+-0.86E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda +c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K+)] assuming B(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K+) = 4.79+-0.23E-4, which we rescale to our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(1P) K+) = 4.74+-0.22E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R22
text:
ABLIKIM 2013D reports 4.5+-0.2+-0.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda +c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R22
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 3.3+-0.9+-0.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda +c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R89
text:
ABLIKIM 2021AV reports 1.66+-0.12+-0.12E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> n K0S Lambdabar + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 0.0975+-0.0024, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Also uses B( Lambdabar --> pbar pi+ ) = (63.9+-0.5)%  and B( K0S --> pi+ pi- ) = (69.20+-0.05)%.


pdgid: M055R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AU reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K^*(892)+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 4.8+-0.5+-0.4E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R46
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports 1.81+-0.38+-0.28E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda(1520) + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R47
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports <1.00E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Lambda(1520) Lambdabar(1520))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R32
text:
ABLIKIM 2018V reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 0.41+-0.05+-0.03E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R32
text:
ABLIKIM 2013H reports <0.62E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R32
text:
NAIK 2008 reports <0.44E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R33
text:
ABLIKIM 2018V reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 0.35+-0.06+-0.02E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R33
text:
ABLIKIM 2013H reports <0.87E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R33
text:
NAIK 2008 reports <0.65E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055P01
text:
ABLIKIM 2024CA reports 5.10+-1.21+-0.67E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R87
text:
ABLIKIM 2020I reports 5.7+-1.4+-0.6E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma- Sigmabar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R54
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <10E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma(1385)+ Sigmabar(1385)-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R55
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <5.7E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Sigma(1385)- Sigmabar(1385)+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R71
text:
ABLIKIM 2015I reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K- Lambda Xibar+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] = 1.32+-0.20+-0.12E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R34
text:
ABLIKIM 2022O reports 0.75+-0.11+-0.06E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Xi0 Xibar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R34
text:
NAIK 2008 reports <0.60E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Xi0 Xibar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R03
text:
ABLIKIM 2022O reports 0.58+-0.04+-0.05E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Xi- Xibar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.24E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R03
text:
NAIK 2008 reports 0.86+-0.22+-0.08E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> Xi- Xibar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R04
text:
ABLIKIM 2005O reports [G(chi_c1(1P) --> K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] < 0.6E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R29
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E reports 228+-13+-22E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma rho0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R29
text:
BENNETT 2008A reports 243+-19+-22E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma rho0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R30
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E reports 69.7+-7.2+-6.6E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R30
text:
BENNETT 2008A reports 83+-15+-12E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R31
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E reports 25.8+-5.2+-2.3E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.2+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R31
text:
BENNETT 2008A reports <26E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 8.7+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75E-2.


pdgid: M055R79
text:
ABLIKIM 2017I reports 3.73+-0.09+-0.25E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c1(1P) --> e+ e- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M055R80
text:
Uses B( psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P) ) x B( chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S) ) = 351.8+-1.0+-12.0E-4 from ABLIKIM 2017N and accounts for common systematic errors.


pdgid: M055R98
text:
Calculated by us. The value given here is derived from the value of B(chi_c1() --> 2(pi+ pi-)) reported in ABLIKIM 2024BT using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = (9.75+-0.24)% [PDG 2022].


pdgid: M055B16
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c1() --> K0 K+ pi- + c.c.) reported by ATHAR 2007 was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = (9.07+-0.11+-0.54)%.


pdgid: M055B16
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2006R reports B(chi_c1() --> K0S K+ pi-) = 4.0+-0.3+-0.5E-3. We use B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = 8.7+-0.4E-2.


pdgid: M055B17
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c1() --> K0S K+ pi-) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = (8.7+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M055B14
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c1() --> 2K+ 2K-) reported by ABLIKIM 2006T was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = (8.7+-0.8)%.


pdgid: M055B15
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c1() --> 2K+ 2K-) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = (8.7+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M055B6
text:
Calculated by us. NAIK 2008 reports B(chi_c1() --> p pbar) = 9.0+-0.8+-0.4+-0.5E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = (9.07+-0.11+-0.54)%.


pdgid: M055B1
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c1() --> p pbar) reported in BAI 1998I is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = (8.7+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M055B10
text:
Calculated by us. NAIK 2008 reports B(chi_c1() --> Lambda Lambdabar) = 11.6+-1.8+-0.7+-0.7E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = (9.07+-0.11+-0.54)%.


pdgid: M055B10
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2013H reports B(chi_c1() --> Lambda Lambdabar) = 12.2+-1.1+-1.1E-5 from a measurement of B(chi_c1() --> Lambda Lambdabar) x B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = (9.2+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M055B11
text:
BAI 2003E reports [ B(chi_c1() --> Lambda Lambdabar) B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) / B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) ] x [B**2(Lambda --> pi- p) / B(J/psi --> p pbar) ] = (1.33+0.52-0.46+-0.25)%. We calculate from this measurement the presented value using B(Lambda --> pi- p) = (63.9+-0.5)% and B(J/psi --> p pbar) = 2.17+-0.07E-3.


pdgid: M055R97
text:
Calculated by us. The authors report B(chi_c1 --> Lambda Lambdabar omega) obtained from a product using PDG 2022 value of B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1).


pdgid: M055B01
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2019BB reports B(chi_c1 --> Sigma+ pbar K0S + c.c.) = 1.53+-0.10+-0.08E-4 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1) = (9.75+-0.24)% and other branching fractions from PDG 2018.


pdgid: M055R88
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2020AE reports B(chi_c1 --> Sigma0 pbar K+ + c.c.) = 1.46+-0.07+-0.07E-4 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0) = (9.75+-0.24)% and other branching fractions from PDG 2020.


pdgid: M055B3
text:
The value for B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1())xB(chi_c1() --> gamma J/psi(1S)) quoted in HIMEL 1980 is derived using B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (33+-3)% and B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.138+-0.018. Calculated by us using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.1181+-0.0020.


pdgid: M055QAR
text:
Statistical and systematic errors combined. Not independent of a(2)(chi_{{c1}}()) and b(2)(chi_{{c1}}()) values from ARTUSO 2009.


pdgid: M144M
text:
Combination of exclusive and inclusive analyses for the reaction psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c --> pi0 eta_c gamma. This result is the average of DOBBS 2008A and ROSNER 2005.


pdgid: M144R24
text:
ABLIKIM 2022N reports [G(h_c(1P) --> J/psi(1S) pi0)/G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))] / [B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0)] < 7.5E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(eta_c --> K+ K- pi0) = 1/6 B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi) = 1/6 ().


pdgid: M144R07
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BY reports [G(h_c(1P) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 6.7E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R07
text:
ABLIKIM 2018M reports [G(h_c(1P) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 2.0E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R20
text:
ABLIKIM 2024R reports [G(h_c(1P) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 3.22E-8 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R22
text:
ABLIKIM 2022M reports [G(h_c(1P) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 5.67E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R08
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AG reports [G(h_c(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 2.49+-0.27+-0.28E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R10
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> p pbar pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 4.4E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R23
text:
ABLIKIM 2022M reports [G(h_c(1P) --> p pbar pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 3.30+-0.71+-0.59E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R21
text:
ABLIKIM 2022M reports [G(h_c(1P) --> p pbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 5.51+-1.50+-0.46E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R01
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BF reports 1.36+-0.16+-0.14E-3 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 8.6+-1.3E-4, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R01
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AG reports [G(h_c(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 1.38+-0.35+-0.17E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R01
text:
ADAMS 2009 reports [G(h_c(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 0.19E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R28
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BF reports <4.0E-4 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 8.6+-1.3E-4, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R11
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0 eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 6.2+-1.6+-0.7E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R26
text:
ABLIKIM 2024R reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- pi0 eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 5.33+-1.10+-0.56E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R02
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AG reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 6.40+-0.81+-0.87E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R02
text:
ADAMS 2009 reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 1.88+0.48-0.45+0.47-0.30E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R27
text:
ABLIKIM 2024R reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 4.53E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R03
text:
ABLIKIM 2024R reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 6.79+-0.83+-0.56E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R03
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AG reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 7.5E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4. Superseded by ABLIKIM 2024R.


pdgid: M144R03
text:
ADAMS 2009 reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 2.5E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R25
text:
ABLIKIM 2024R reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 2.93+-0.63+-0.26E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R09
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AG reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 0.5E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R12
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 2.8+-0.5+-0.3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R13
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- pi+ pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 2.0E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R14
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BF reports 3.26+-0.84+-0.36E-4 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 8.6+-1.3E-4, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Significance 3.5sigma.


pdgid: M144R14
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 4.8E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R15
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- pi0 eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 1.8E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R16
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BF reports 3.13+-1.08+-0.38E-4 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 8.6+-1.3E-4, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Significance 3.3sigma.


pdgid: M144R16
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K+ K- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 7.5E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R17
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> 2K+ 2K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 2.1E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R18
text:
ABLIKIM 2024Y reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K0S K+- pi-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 5.3+-1.3+-0.4E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R18
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K0S K+- pi-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] < 4.8E-7 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4E-4.


pdgid: M144R19
text:
ABLIKIM 2020AH reports [G(h_c(1P) --> K0S K+- pi-+ pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 2.4+-0.7+-0.3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R06
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BJ reports 3.77+-0.55+-0.29E-4 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4.


pdgid: M144R00
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BJ reports 1.40+-0.11+-0.11E-3 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta^'(958))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4.


pdgid: M144R29
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BJ reports <5.0E-5 from a measurement of [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4.


pdgid: M144R2
text:
ABLIKIM 2022AQ reports [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 4.22+0.27-0.26+-0.19E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R2
text:
Average of DOBBS 2008A and ROSNER 2005. DOBBS 2008A reports [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 4.16+-0.30+-0.37E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R2
text:
ABLIKIM 2010B reports [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 4.58+-0.40+-0.50E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R2
text:
DOBBS 2008A reports [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 4.19+-0.32+-0.45E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M144R2
text:
ROSNER 2005 reports [G(h_c(1P) --> gamma eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0)] = 4.0+-0.8+-0.7E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> h_c(1P) pi0) = 7.4+-0.5E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057M
text:
From a fit of the phi phi invariant mass with the width of chi_{{c2}}(1P) fixed to the PDG 2016 value.


pdgid: M057G2
text:
Calculated from the measured Gamma(gamma gamma) x B(chi_c2(1S) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) x B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 14.8+-0.3+-0.7 eV, using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 11.93+-0.05%.


pdgid: M057G2
text:
The value for Gamma(chi_c2() --> gamma gamma) reported in ACCIARRI 1999E is derived using B(chi_c2() --> gamma J/psi(1S))xB(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.0162+-0.0014.


pdgid: M057G2
text:
The value for Gamma(chi_c2() --> gamma gamma) reported in ACKERSTAFF,K 1998 is derived using B(chi_c2() --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.135+-0.011 and B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.1203+-0.0038.


pdgid: M057G2
text:
The value for Gamma(chi_c2() --> gamma gamma) reported in DOMINICK 1994 is derived using B(chi_c2() --> gamma J/psi(1S))= 0.135+-0.011, B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.0627+-0.0020, and B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 0.0597+-0.0025.


pdgid: M057G2
text:
The value for Gamma(chi_c2() --> gamma gamma) reported in BAUER 1993 is derived using B(chi_c2() --> gamma J/psi(1S))= 0.135+-0.011, B(J/psi(1S) --> e+ e-) = 0.0627+-0.0020, and B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 0.0597+-0.0025.


pdgid: M057P07
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BT reports 1.153+-0.001+-0.063 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> 2(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R46
text:
HE 2008B reports 1.87+-0.07+-0.22+-0.13 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pi+ pi- pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R47
text:
HE 2008B reports 2.23+-0.11+-0.32+-0.16 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> rho+ pi- pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R58
text:
ABLIKIM 2011A reports 1.21+-0.05+-0.16E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> 4pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R48
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.21+-0.03+-0.03+-0.01 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ K- pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R50
text:
HE 2008B reports 1.41+-0.11+-0.16+-0.10 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R51
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.42+-0.11+-0.06+-0.03 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> rho- K+ Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R57
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.30+-0.07+-0.04+-0.02 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)0 K- pi+ --> K- pi+ K0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R52
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.39+-0.07+-0.05+-0.03 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar0 pi0 --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R53
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.38+-0.07+-0.04+-0.03 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)- K+ pi0 --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R54
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.30+-0.07+-0.04+-0.02 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)+ Kbar0 pi- --> K+ pi- Kbar0 pi0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R55
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.13+-0.04+-0.02+-0.01 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ K- eta pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R4
text:
ABLIKIM 2022Q reports 1.565+-0.005+-0.048E-2 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> 3(pi+ pi-))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R4
text:
Rescaled by us using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2())= (8.3+-0.4)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.6+-0.5)%. Multiplied by a factor of 2 to convert from K0S K+ pi- to K0 K+ pi- decay.


pdgid: M057R20
text:
Measured using B( psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P) ) = 9.75+-0.24E-2 and B( phi --> K+ K- ) = 49.2+-0.5E-2 from  PDG 2022.


pdgid: M057R97
text:
ABLIKIM 2020B reports 5.33+-0.52+-0.39E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> phi phi eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R28
text:
ABLIKIM 2011K reports 8.9+-0.3+-1.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> omega omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R28
text:
ABLIKIM 2005N reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> omega omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.165+-0.044+-0.032E-3 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R63
text:
ABLIKIM 2019J reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.91+-0.23+-0.12E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R63
text:
ABLIKIM 2011K reports <2E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> omega phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R85
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 0.64+-0.39+-0.07E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> rho(770)+- pi-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R08
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 0.49+-0.12+-0.06E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R08
text:
ABLIKIM 2006R reports <1.7E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.1+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R35
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 0.51+-0.18+-0.06E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pi+ pi- eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 1.5+-0.1+-0.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 1.8+-0.2+-0.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R86
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 1.4+-0.2+-0.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R87
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 1.3+-0.2+-0.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)0 Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R88
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 15.5+-0.6+-1.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_2^*(1430)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R88
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 18.2+-0.8+-1.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_2^*(1430)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R88
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 13.6+-0.8+-1.4E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_2^*(1430)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R89
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 13.0+-1.0+-1.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_2^*(1430)0 Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R90
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 5.4+-0.5+-0.7E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_3^*(1780)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R90
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 5.3+-0.5+-0.9E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_3^*(1780)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R90
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 5.9+-1.1+-1.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_3^*(1780)+- K-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R91
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 5.9+-1.6+-1.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K_3^*(1780)0 Kbar0 + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R92
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 13.5+-1.6+-3.2E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> a_2(1320)0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R93
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AG reports 18.4+-3.3+-5.5E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> a_2(1320)+- pi-+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R05
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 0.31+-0.07+-0.04E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R09
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports <0.33E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ K- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R78
text:
Derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (8.72+-0.34)%. Uncertainty includes both statistical and systematic contributions combined in quadrature.


pdgid: M057R03
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AI reports 2.27+-0.43+-0.25E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> eta eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R03
text:
ASNER 2009 reports <0.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> eta eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R03
text:
Superseded by ASNER 2009. ADAMS 2007 reports <2.3E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> eta eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 0.0933+-0.0014+-0.0061, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R04
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AI reports 4.76+-0.56+-0.38E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> eta^' eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R04
text:
ASNER 2009 reports <1.0E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> eta^' eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R04
text:
Superseded by ASNER 2009. ADAMS 2007 reports <3.1E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> eta^' eta^')/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 0.0933+-0.0014+-0.0061, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R31
text:
ABLIKIM 2005O reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pi+ pi- K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.207+-0.039+-0.033E-3 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R32
text:
ABLIKIM 2005O reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ K- K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] < 3.5E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R94
text:
Using B(K0S --> pi+ pi-) = (69.20+-0.05)%. ABLIKIM 2019AA reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K0S K0S K0S K0S)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 10.8+-1.5+-0.8E-6 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value..


pdgid: M057R01
text:
ABLIKIM 2006T reports 1.67+-0.26+-0.24E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ K- phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.1+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R06
text:
ONYISI 2010 reports 4.83+-0.25+-0.35+-0.31E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R06
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 0.44+-0.08+-0.05E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R34
text:
ONYISI 2010 reports 1.76+-0.23+-0.14+-0.11E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R34
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 0.19+-0.07+-0.02E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R56
text:
ONYISI 2010 reports 3.68+-0.35+-0.26+-0.24E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R62
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports 3.04+-0.85+-0.43E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R49
text:
HE 2008B reports 0.08+-0.02+-0.01+-0.01 % from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar pi0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R59
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports 2.08+-0.19+-0.30E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p pbar K+ K- (non-resonant))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R33
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p nbar pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.80+-0.02+-0.09E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R33
text:
ABLIKIM 2006I reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p nbar pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.97+-0.20+-0.26E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R70
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pbar n pi+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.85+-0.02+-0.07E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R71
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> p nbar pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 2.07+-0.06+-0.15E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R72
text:
ABLIKIM 2012J reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> pbar n pi+ pi0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 2.01+-0.06+-0.16E-4 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R29
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports 137.0+-7.6+-15.7E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Lambda Lambdabar pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R66
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <42E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma(1385)+ Lambdabar pi- + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R67
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <61E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma(1385)- Lambdabar pi+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R07
text:
ABLIKIM 2013D reports 8.4+-0.3+-0.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R07
text:
ATHAR 2007 reports 8.5+-1.4+-1.0E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057P01
text:
ABLIKIM 2021AV reports 3.58+-0.16+-0.23E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> n K0S Lambdabar + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 0.0952+-0.0020, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Also uses B( Lambdabar --> pbar pi+ ) = (63.9+-0.5)% and B( K0S --> pi+ pi- ) = (69.20+-0.05)%.


pdgid: M057R98
text:
ABLIKIM 2019AU reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K^*(892)+ pbar Lambda + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 7.8+-0.9+-0.6E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R60
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports 3.06+-0.50+-0.54E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K+ pbar Lambda(1520) + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R61
text:
ABLIKIM 2011F reports 5.05+-1.29+-0.93E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Lambda(1520) Lambdabar(1520))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R43
text:
ABLIKIM 2018V reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.35+-0.05+-0.02E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R43
text:
ABLIKIM 2013H reports <0.65E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R43
text:
NAIK 2008 reports <0.75E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma0 Sigmabar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R44
text:
ABLIKIM 2018V reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 0.32+-0.06+-0.03E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R44
text:
ABLIKIM 2013H reports <0.88E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R44
text:
NAIK 2008 reports <0.67E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057P11
text:
ABLIKIM 2024CA reports 5.46+-1.18+-0.50E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar- eta)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R99
text:
ABLIKIM 2020I reports 4.4+-1.7+-0.5E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma- Sigmabar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R68
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <17E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma(1385)+ Sigmabar(1385)-)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R69
text:
ABLIKIM 2012I reports <8.5E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Sigma(1385)- Sigmabar(1385)+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.72+-0.34E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R81
text:
ABLIKIM 2015I reports [G(chi_c2(1P) --> K- Lambda Xibar+ + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] = 1.68+-0.26+-0.15E-5 which we divide by our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R45
text:
ABLIKIM 2022O reports 1.83+-0.15+-0.16E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Xi0 Xibar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R45
text:
NAIK 2008 reports <1.06E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Xi0 Xibar0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R17
text:
ABLIKIM 2022O reports 1.44+-0.06+-0.11E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Xi- Xibar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.52+-0.20E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R17
text:
NAIK 2008 reports 1.45+-0.30+-0.15E-4 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> Xi- Xibar+)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.33+-0.14+-0.61E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R40
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E reports <20.8E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma rho0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R40
text:
BENNETT 2008A reports <50E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma rho0)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.1+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R41
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E reports <6.1E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R41
text:
BENNETT 2008A reports <7.0E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma omega)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.1+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R42
text:
ABLIKIM 2011E reports <8.1E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.74+-0.35E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R42
text:
BENNETT 2008A reports <13E-6 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma phi)/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 8.1+-0.4E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38E-2.


pdgid: M057R82
text:
ABLIKIM 2017I reports 2.48+-0.08+-0.16E-3 from a measurement of [G(chi_c2(1P) --> e+ e- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.11+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = 9.38+-0.23E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M057R83
text:
Uses B( psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P) ) x B( chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S) ) = 199.6+-0.8+-7.0E-4 from ABLIKIM 2017N and accounts for common systematic errors.


pdgid: M057B5
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c2() --> 2pi+ 2pi-) reported in BAI 1999B is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (7.8+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M057B5
text:
The value for B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2())xB(chi_c2() --> 2pi+ pi-) reported in TANENBAUM 1978 is derived using B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)xB(J/psi(1S) lepton+ lepton-) = (4.6+-0.7)%. Calculated by us using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.1181+-0.0020.


pdgid: M057P08
text:
Calculated by us. The value given here is derived from the value of B(chi_c2() --> 2(pi+ pi-)) reported in ABLIKIM 2024BT using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (9.52+-0.20)% [PDG 2022].


pdgid: M057B16
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c2() --> phi phi) reported by ABLIKIM 2011K was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = (8.74+-0.35)%.


pdgid: M057B16
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c2() --> phi phi) reported by ABLIKIM 2006T was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = (8.1+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M057B17
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c2() --> phi phi) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = (7.8+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M057B02
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2010A reports B(chi_c2() --> pi0 pi0) = 0.88+-0.02+-0.06+-0.04E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (8.3+-0.4)%. We have multiplied the pi0 pi0 measurement by 3 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M057B02
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c2() --> pi+ pi-) = 1.59+-0.04+-0.07+-0.10E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2() ) = (9.33+-0.14+-0.61)%. We have multiplied the pi+ pi- measurement by 3/2 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M057B02
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c2() --> pi0 pi0) = 0.68+-0.03+-0.07+-0.04E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2() ) = (9.33+-0.14+-0.61)%. We have multiplied the pi0 pi0 measurement by 3 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M057B9
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c2() --> pi+ pi-) reported by BAI 1998I is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (7.8+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D]. We have multiplied pi+ pi- measurement by 3/2 to obtain pi pi.


pdgid: M057B04
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2010A reports B(chi_c2() --> eta eta) = 0.65+-0.04+-0.05+-0.03E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (8.3+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M057B03
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c2() --> K+ K-) = 1.13+-0.03+-0.06+-0.07E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2() ) = (9.33+-0.14+-0.61)%.


pdgid: M057B8
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c2() --> K+ K-) reported by BAI 1998I is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (7.8+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M057B12
text:
Calculated by us. ASNER 2009 reports B(chi_c2() --> K0S K0S) = 0.53+-0.03+-0.03+-0.03E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2() ) = (9.33+-0.14+-0.61)%.


pdgid: M057B13
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c2() --> K0S K0S) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = (7.8+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M057B05
text:
Calculated by us. ATHAR 2007 reports B(chi_c2() --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.) = 1.3+-0.2+-0.1+-0.1E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (9.33+-0.14+-0.61)%.


pdgid: M057B05
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2006R reports B(chi_c2() --> K0S K()+- pi()-+) = 0.6+-0.2+-0.1E-3 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (8.1+-0.6)%. We have multiplied by 2 to obtain Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c. from K0S K()+- pi()-+.


pdgid: M057B14
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c2() --> 2K+ 2K-) reported by ABLIKIM 2006T was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = (8.1+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M057B15
text:
Calculated by us. The value of B(chi_c2() --> 2K+ 2K-) reported by BAI 1999B was derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2(1P)) = (7.8+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M057B1
text:
Calculated by us. The value for B(chi_c2() --> p pbar) reported in BAI 1998I is derived using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (7.8+-0.8)% and B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (32.4+-2.6)% [BAI 1998D].


pdgid: M057B6
text:
Calculated by us. NAIK 2008 reports B(chi_c2() --> p pbar) = 7.7+-0.8+-0.4+-0.5E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (9.33+-0.14+-0.61)%.


pdgid: M057B10
text:
Calculated by us. NAIK 2008 reports B(chi_c2() --> Lambda Lambdabar) = 17.0+-2.2+-1.1+-1.1E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (9.33+-0.14+-0.61)%.


pdgid: M057B10
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2013H reports B(chi_c2() --> Lambda Lambdabar) = 20.8+-1.6+-2.3E-5 from a measurement of B(chi_c2() --> Lambda Lambdabar) x B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = (8.74+-0.35)%.


pdgid: M057B11
text:
BAI 2003E reports [ B(chi_c2() --> Lambda Lambdabar) B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) / B(psi(2S) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) ] x [B**2(Lambda --> pi- p) / B(J/psi --> p pbar) ] = (1.33+0.59-0.55+-0.25)%. We calculate from this measurement the presented value using B(Lambda --> pi- p) = (63.9+-0.5)% and B(J/psi --> p pbar) = 2.17+-0.07E-3.


pdgid: M057P06
text:
Calculated by us. The authors report B(chi_c2 --> Lambda Lambdabar omega) obtained from a product using PDG 2022 value of B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2).


pdgid: M057B07
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2019BB reports B(chi_c2 --> Sigma+ pbar K0S + c.c.) = 8.25+-0.83+-0.49E-5 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2) = (9.52+-0.20)%  and other branching fractions from PDG 2018.


pdgid: M057P00
text:
Calculated by us. ABLIKIM 2020AE reports B(chi_c2 --> Sigma0 pbar K+ + c.c.) = 0.91+-0.06+-0.05E-4 using B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2) = (9.52+-0.20)% and other branching fractions from PDG 2020.


pdgid: M057B3
text:
The value for B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2())xB(chi_c2() --> gamma J/psi(1S)) reported in HIMEL 1980 is derived using B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (33+-3)% and B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.138+-0.018. Calculated by us using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (0.1181+-0.0020).


pdgid: M057B4
text:
ABLIKIM 2017AE measures the ratio of two-photon partial widths for the helicity lambda = 0 and helicity lambda = 2 components to be f(0/2) = Gamma(gamma gamma)**lambda=0 / Gamma(gamma gamma)**lambda=2 = 0.000+-0.006+-0.012.


pdgid: M057B4
text:
ABLIKIM 2012A measures the ratio of two-photon partial widths for the helicity lambda = 0 and helicity lambda = 2 components to be f(0/2) = Gamma(gammagamma)**lambda=0/Gamma(gammagamma)**lambda=2 = 0.00+-0.02+-0.02. Superseded by ABLIKIM 2017AE.


pdgid: M057B06
text:
Not independent from the values of Gamma(chi_{{c0}}(), chi_{{c2}}()) and B(psi(2S) --> chi_c0(), chi_{{c2}}()).


pdgid: M057A1
text:
Correlated with a_{{3}}, b_{{2}}, and b_{{3}} with correlation coefficients rho(a_2 a_3) = 0.733, rho(a_2 b_2) = -0.605, and rho(a_2 b_3) = -0.095.


pdgid: M057A2
text:
Correlated with a_{{2}}, b_{{2}}, and b_{{3}} with correlation coefficients rho(a_2 a_3) = 0.733, rho(a_3 b_2) = -0.422, and rho(a_3 b_3) = -0.024.


pdgid: M057QB2
text:
Correlated with a_{{2}}, a_{{3}}, and b_{{3}} with correlation coefficients rho(a_2 b_2) = -0.605, rho(a_3 b_2) = -0.422, and rho(b_2 b_3) = 0.384.


pdgid: M057QB3
text:
Correlated with a_{{2}}, a_{{3}}, and b_{{2}} with correlation coefficients rho(a_2 b_3) = -0.095, rho(a_3 b_3) = -0.024, and rho(b_2 b_3) = 0.384.


pdgid: M057QAR
text:
Statistical and systematic errors combined. From a fit with floating M2 amplitudes a(2) and b(2), and fixed E3 amplitudes a(3)=b(3)=0. Not independent of values for a(2)(chi_{{c2}}(1P)) and b(2)(chi_{{c2}}(1P)) from ARTUSO 2009.


pdgid: M059M
text:
AAIJ 2017AD report mass(psi(2S))-mass(eta_{{c}}(2S)) = 52.5+-1.7+-0.6 MeV. We use the current value mass(psi(2S)) = 3686.097+-0.025 MeV to obtain the quoted mass.


pdgid: M059M
text:
From a fit of the phi phi invariant mass with the width of eta_{{c}}(2S) fixed to the PDG 2016 value.


pdgid: M059W1
text:
They measure Gamma(eta_c(2S) gamma gamma) B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi) = (0.18+-0.05+-0.02) Gamma(eta_c(1S) gamma gamma) B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi). The value for Gamma(eta_c(2S) --> gamma gamma) is derived assuming that the branching fractions for eta_{{c }}(2S) and eta_{{c }}(1S) decays to K_S K pi are equal and using Gamma(eta_c(1S) --> gamma gamma) = 7.4+-0.4+-2.3 keV.


pdgid: M059G04
text:
NAKAZAWA 2008 reports B(eta_c(2S) --> K0S K+- pi-+) x Gamma(gamma gamma) = 11.2+-2.4+-2.7 eV which we multiplied by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M059R3
text:
Derived from a measurement of [B(B+ --> eta_c(2S) K+) x B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi)] / [B(B+ --> eta_c() K+) x B(eta_c() --> K Kbar pi)] = (9.6+2.0-1.9+-2.5)% and using B(B+ --> eta_c(2S) K+) = 3.4+-1.8E-4, and [B(B+ --> eta_c() K+) x B(eta_c() --> K Kbar pi)] = 6.88+-0.77+0.55-0.66E-5.


pdgid: M059R26
text:
LEES 2014E reports B(eta_c(2S) --> K+ K- eta)/B(eta_c(2S) --> K+ K- pi0) = 0.82+-0.21+-0.27, which we divide by 3 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M059R21
text:
Not independent from other measurements reported in DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011M. We have multiplied the value of Gamma(K+ K- pi+ pi- pi0)/Gamma(K0S K()+- pi()-+) reported in DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2011M by a factor 1/3 to obtain.


pdgid: M059R04
text:
AAIJ 2017AD report a 6.4 standard deviation signal, with B(B+ --> eta_c(2S) K+ --> p pbar K+)/B(B+ --> J/psi K+ --> p pbar K+) = 1.58+-0.33+-0.09E-2.


pdgid: M059R30
text:
CHILIKIN 2019 reports signals in B+ --> eta_c(2S) K+ and B0 --> eta_c(2S) K0S with 12.3 and 5.9 standard deviations, respectively.


pdgid: M059R2
text:
WICHT 2008 reports [G(eta_c(2S) --> gamma gamma)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> eta_c(2S) K+)] < 0.18E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> eta_c(2S) K+) = 4.4E-4.


pdgid: M059R25
text:
ABLIKIM 2024BW reports a value of 2.39+-0.32+-0.34E-6 for the decay eta_c(2S) --> K+ K- eta which we multiply by 2 to account for isospin symmetry.


pdgid: M059R25
text:
CRONIN-HENNESSY 2010 reports a limit of <5.9E-6 for the decay eta_c(2S) --> K+ K- eta which we multiply by 2 account for isospin symmetry. It assumes Gamma(eta_{{c}}(2S)) = 14 MeV. It also gives the analytic dependence of limits on width.


pdgid: M059R05
text:
Assuming Gamma(eta_{{c}}(2S)) = 14 MeV. CRONIN-HENNESSY 2010 gives the analytic dependence of limits on width.


pdgid: M071M
text:
Mass central value and systematic error recalculated by us according to Eq. (16) in ARMSTRONG 1993B, using the value for the J/psi(1S) mass from AULCHENKO 2003.


pdgid: M071M
text:
From a fit of a relativistic S-wave Breit-Wigner convolved with the detector resolution. The width of psi(2S) is constrained to the PDG 2022 value. Systematic errors not evaluated.


pdgid: M071M
text:
From the scans in 2004 and 2006. ANASHIN 2012 reports the value 3686.114+-0.007+-0.011+0.002-0.012 MeV, where the third uncertainty is due to assumptions on the interference between the resonance and hadronic continuum. We combined the two systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: M071W
text:
From a simultaneous fit to the hadronic and mu+ mu- cross section, assuming Gamma = Gamma(h) + Gamma(e) + Gamma(mu) + Gamma(tau) and lepton universality. Does not include vacuum polarization correction.


pdgid: M071W1
text:
ABLIKIM 2015V reports 2.213+-0.018+-0.099 keV from a measurement of [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] * [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.95+-0.45E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.69+-0.34E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071W1
text:
From a simultaneous fit to e+ e-, mu+ mu-, and hadronic channel, assuming Gamma(e) = Gamma(mu) = Gamma(tau)/0.38847.


pdgid: M071W1
text:
Combining Gamma(e+ e-).B(mu+ mu-) from ANASHIN 2018 with Gamma(e+ e-).B(hadrons) from ANASHIN 2012 and assuming lepton universality.


pdgid: M071W1
text:
From the sum of Gamma(e+ e-).B(hadrons) from ANASHIN 2012, Gamma(e+ e-).B(e+ e-) and Gamma(e+ e-).B(mu+ mu-) from ANASHIN 2018, and Gamma(e+ e-).B(tau+ tau-) from ANASHIN 2007.


pdgid: M071G3
text:
ANASHIN 2012 reports the value 2.233+-0.015+-0.037+-0.020 keV, where the third uncertainty is due to assumptions on the interference between the resonance and hadronic continuum. We combined the two systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: M071G1
text:
LEES 2023 reports [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+)] = 4.14+-0.55+-0.29E-3 keV which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 5.3+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G1
text:
LEES 2012E reports [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 49.9+-1.3+-1.0E-3 keV which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G1
text:
The value of Gamma(e+ e-) quoted in BAI 1998E is derived using B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)= 32.4+-2.6E-2 and B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-)= 0.1203+-0.0038. Recalculated by us using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-)= 0.1181+-0.0020.


pdgid: M071G1
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 0.0186+-0.0012+-0.0011 keV which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 2.00+-0.07E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G1
text:
AUBERT 2005D reports [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 0.0450+-0.0018+-0.0022 keV which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Superseded by LEES 2012E.


pdgid: M071G6
text:
LEES 2023 reports [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi0 pi0) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> K+ K- pi0)] = 1.31+-0.35+-0.13E-3 keV which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> K+ K- pi0) = 2.88+-0.12E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G6
text:
LEES 2023 reports [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi0 pi0) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+)] = 2.36+-0.59+-0.24E-3 keV which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 5.3+-0.5E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G6
text:
LEES 2018E reports [G(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi0 pi0) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(J/psi(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 0.0101+-0.0015+-0.0011 keV which we divide by our best value B(J/psi(1S) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 2.00+-0.07E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G7
text:
AUBERT 2007AU quotes Gamma()**psi(2S).B(psi(2S) --> J/psi eta). B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-). B(eta --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 1.11+-0.33+-0.07 eV.


pdgid: M071G03
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(psi(2S) --> eta 2(pi+ pi-)) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] = 1.13+-0.55+-0.08 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G03
text:
LEES 2021 reports [G(psi(2S) --> eta 2(pi+ pi-)) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 3pi0)] < 2.3 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 3pi0) = 32.56E-2.


pdgid: M071P40
text:
LEES 2021C reports [G(psi(2S) --> eta pi+ pi- 3pi0) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] < 1.9 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36E-2.


pdgid: M071P33
text:
LEES 2021 reports [G(psi(2S) --> eta 2(pi+ pi- pi0)) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] < 1.9 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36E-2.


pdgid: M071G02
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(psi(2S) --> omega pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 2.69+-0.73+-0.16 eV which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071P32
text:
LEES 2021 reports [G(psi(2S) --> omega pi+ pi- 2pi0) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 18+-4+-3 eV which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071P17
text:
LEES 2018E reports [G(psi(2S) --> omega pi0 pi0) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] = 2.3+-0.7+-0.2 eV which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071P39
text:
LEES 2021C reports [G(psi(2S) --> omega 3pi0) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0)] < 1.6 eV which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi- pi0) = 89.2E-2.


pdgid: M071G10
text:
LEES 2012F reports [G(psi(2S) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.27+-0.09+-0.02 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G10
text:
Superseded by LEES 2012F. AUBERT,BE 2006D reports [G(psi(2S) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.28+-0.11+-0.02 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G13
text:
LEES 2012F reports [G(psi(2S) --> phi f_0(980) --> pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.17+-0.06+-0.02 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G13
text:
Superseded by LEES 2012F. AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(psi(2S) --> phi f_0(980) --> pi+ pi-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] = 0.17+-0.08+-0.02 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9+-0.5E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071G05
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(psi(2S) --> K+ K- pi+ pi- eta) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 2gamma)] = 1.2+-0.7+-0.1 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 2gamma) = 39.36+-0.18E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071R5
text:
Using B(psi(2S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (0.794+-0.017)% and R = 2.26+-0.01 determined by a fit to data from Mark-I, DM2, BESII, KEDR, and BESIII.


pdgid: M071R5
text:
Using B(psi(2S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (0.73+-0.04)% from RPP-2002 and R = 2.28+-0.04 determined by a fit to data from BAI 2000 and BAI 2002C. Superseded by LIAO 2023.


pdgid: M071S43
text:
Calculated using Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(g g g) = 0.097+-0.026+-0.016 from LIBBY 2009, B(psi(2S) --> X J/psi) relative and absolute branching fractions from MENDEZ 2008, B(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c) from MITCHELL 2009, and B(psi(2S) --> virtual gamma --> hadrons), B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_cJ()), and B(psi(2S) --> lepton+ lepton-) from PDG 2008. The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is largely uncorrelated with that of Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(total) LIBBY 2009 measurement.


pdgid: M071S44
text:
Calculated using Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(g g g) = 0.097+-0.026+-0.016 from LIBBY 2009. The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is largely uncorrelated with that of Gamma(g g g)/Gamma(total) LIBBY 2009 measurement.


pdgid: M071S27
text:
Uses B(J/psi X) from ADAM 2005A, B(chi_cJ() gamma), B(eta_c gamma) from ATHAR 2004 and B(lepton+ lepton-) from PDG 2004. Superseded by MENDEZ 2008.


pdgid: M071R1
text:
From an overall fit assuming equal partial widths for e+ e- and mu+ mu-. For a measurement of the ratio see the entry G(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-)/G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) below. Includes LUTH 1975, HILGER 1975, BURMESTER 1977.


pdgid: M071R75
text:
Computed using PDG 2002 value of B(psi(2S) --> hadrons) = 0.9810+-0.0030 to estimate the total number of psi(2S) events.


pdgid: M071R10
text:
From a fit to the e+ e- --> J/psi X cross section between 3.645 and 3.891 GeV, with Gamma(ee) and Gamma fixed to the PDG 2020 values of the cross particle fit which are correlated to "OUR FIT" value for B(psi(2S) --> J/psi X).


pdgid: M071R71
text:
The value for B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1s) eta) reported in HIMEL 1980 is derived using B(psi(2S)) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = (33+-3))% and B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 0.138+-0.018. Calculated by us using B(J/psi(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (0.1181+-0.0020).


pdgid: M071R20
text:
Obtained by analyzing CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration. Using psi(3770) --> pi+ pi- for continuum subtraction.


pdgid: M071R36
text:
From psi(2S) --> pi+ pi- pi0 events directly. The quoted systematic error includes a contribution of 4% (added in quadrature) from the uncertainty on the number of psi(2S) events.


pdgid: M071R22
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(psi(2S) --> 2(pi+ pi-) pi0)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] = 297+-22+-18E-4 keV which we divide by our best value [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 2.33+-0.04 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071R93
text:
Destructive-interference solution of a partial wave analysis of the decay psi(2S) --> pi+ pi- eta^'.


pdgid: M071R93
text:
Constructive-interference solution of a partial wave analysis of the decay psi(2S) --> pi+ pi- eta^'.


pdgid: M071R77
text:
AUBERT 2007AU quotes Gamma()**psi(2S).B(psi(2S) --> omega pi+ pi-). B(omega --> 3pi) = 2.69+-0.73+-0.16 eV.


pdgid: M071R80
text:
Superseded by LEES 2012F. AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(psi(2S) --> phi pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] = 0.57+-0.22+-0.04E-3 keV which we divide by our best value [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 2.33+-0.04 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071R83
text:
Superseded by LEES 2012F. AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(psi(2S) --> phi f_0(980) --> pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] = 0.34+-0.16+-0.04E-3 keV which we divide by our best value [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 2.33+-0.04 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071P60
text:
Data at 3.773 GeV assumed to be e+ e- (3.773) --> 3 phi events yield an estimate for the continuum amplitude at the psi(2S). No interference between the psi(2S) and continuum amplitudes is assumed.


pdgid: M071P22
text:
ABLIKIM 2019BA reports [G(psi(2S) --> phi f_1(1285))/G(total)] * [B(f_1(1285) --> eta pi+ pi-)] = 1.03+-0.10+-0.09E-5 which we divide by our best value B(f_1(1285) --> eta pi+ pi-) = 35+-15E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071R24
text:
Superseded by LEES 2012F. AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(psi(2S) --> K+ K- pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] = 2.56+-0.42+-0.16E-3 keV which we divide by our best value [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 2.33+-0.04 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071S10
text:
AUBERT 2007AU reports [G(psi(2S) --> K+ K- pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] = 44+-13+-3E-4 keV which we divide by our best value [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 2.33+-0.04 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071S39
text:
AUBERT 2007AU quotes Gamma()**psi(2S).B(psi(2S) --> 2(pi+ pi) eta).B(eta --> gamma gamma) = 1.2+-0.7+-0.1 eV.


pdgid: M071P57
text:
LEES 2023 reports [G(psi(2S) --> eta K+ K-) * G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(eta --> 3pi0)] < 0.2 eV which we divide by our best value B(eta --> 3pi0) = 32.56E-2.


pdgid: M071S73
text:
Statistical signficance 4.5 sigma. This measurement is equivalent to a limit of <0.478E-5 at 90% C.L.


pdgid: M071S74
text:
Statistical signficance 3.2 sigma. This measurement is equivalent to a limit of <0.221E-5 at 90% C.L.


pdgid: M071S50
text:
From a fit of the p pbar and p pi0 mass distributions to a combination of N(1440) pbar, a broad p pbar enhancement around 2100 MeV, and two other broad, unestablished resonances.


pdgid: M071S53
text:
From a fit of the p pbar and p eta distributions to a combination of N^*(1535) pbar and a broad p pbar enhancement around 2100 MeV.


pdgid: M071R28
text:
AUBERT 2007BD reports [G(psi(2S) --> Lambda Lambdabar)/G(total)] * [[G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-)] = 15+-4+-1E-4 keV which we divide by our best value [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 2.33+-0.04 keV. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071S42
text:
Assuming a width Gamma(h_{{c}}(1P)) = 0.86 MeV == Gamma_{{0}}(), a measured dependence of the central value of B = (7.6 +1.4 x Gamma(h_{{c}}(1P)/Gamma_{{0}}()) x E-4, and with a systematic error that accounts for the width variation range 0.43 -- 1.29 MeV.


pdgid: M071R62
text:
ABLIKIM 2024J reports [G(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(2S))/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi)] = 0.97+-0.06+-0.09E-5 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi) = 1.9+1.2-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071R62
text:
ABLIKIM 2012G reports [G(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(2S))/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi)] = 1.30+-0.20+-0.30E-5 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi) = 1.9+1.2-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071R62
text:
CRONIN-HENNESSY 2010 reports [G(psi(2S) --> gamma eta_c(2S))/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi)] < 14.5E-6 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi) = 1.9E-2. This measurement assumes Gamma(eta_{{c}}(2S)) = 14 MeV. CRONIN-HENNESSY 2010 gives the analytic dependence of limits on width.


pdgid: M071R42
text:
Taking into account interference between psi(2S) and continuum amplitudes. Range of the 1sigma contour in the plane of B(psi(2S) --> gamma pi0) versus phi, the relative phase of the amplitudes. The fit provides two solutions for B(psi(2S) --> gamma pi0): 3.74E-7 (phi = 3.93 rad) and 7.87E-7 (phi = 2.08 rad).


pdgid: M071R84
text:
DOBBS 2015 reports [G(psi(2S) --> gamma f_2(1270))/G(total)] * [B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)] = 2.39+-0.09+-0.09E-4 which we divide by our best value B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = 84.3+2.8-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071S76
text:
DOBBS 2015 reports [G(psi(2S) --> gamma f_0(1500))/G(total)] * [B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi)] = 3.2+-0.6+-0.2E-5 which we divide by our best value B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi) = 34.5+-2.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071S77
text:
DOBBS 2015 reports [G(psi(2S) --> gamma f_2^'(1525))/G(total)] * [B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar)] = 2.9+-0.6+-0.3E-5 which we divide by our best value B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-2.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071R86
text:
Includes unknown branching fractions to K+ K- or K0S K0S. We have multiplied the K+ K- result by a factor of 2 and the K0S K0S result by a factor of 4 to obtain the K Kbar result.


pdgid: M071S80
text:
For Gamma = 20/50 MeV, the 90% CL upper limits for pi+ pi- and pi0 pi0 are 3.2/4.3E-6 and 2.6/4.0E-6, respectively.


pdgid: M071S81
text:
For Gamma = 20/50 MeV, the 90% CL upper limits for K+ K- and K0S K0S are 2.1/4.3E-6 and 3.7/5.5E-6, respectively.


pdgid: M071S33
text:
From a fit of the p pbar mass distribution to a combination of gamma f_2(1950), gamma f_2(2150), and gamma p pbar phase space, for M(p pbar < 2.85 GeV, and accounting for backgrounds from psi(2S) --> pi0 p pbar and continuum.


pdgid: M071S55
text:
Uses B( J/psi --> e+ e- ) = (5.971+-0.032)% and B( J/psi --> mu+ mu- ) = (5.961+-0.033)%. No systematic error estimation.


pdgid: M071P01
text:
ABLIKIM 2017I reports 11.7+-2.5+-1.0E-4 from a measurement of [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e- chi_c0(1P))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 1.27+-0.06E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c0(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 1.41+-0.09E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071P02
text:
ABLIKIM 2017I reports 8.6+-0.3+-0.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e- chi_c1(1P))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 33.9+-1.2E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071P03
text:
ABLIKIM 2017I reports 6.9+-0.5+-0.6E-4 from a measurement of [G(psi(2S) --> e+ e- chi_c2(1P))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 19.2+-0.7E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 19.5+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M071QAR
text:
Statistical and systematic errors combined. Using values from fits with floating M2 amplitudes a(2)(chi_{{c1}}()), a(2)(chi_{{c2}}()), b(2)(chi_{{c1}}()), b(2)(chi_{{c2}}()) and fixed E3 amplitudes of a(3)(chi_{{c2}}()) = b(3)(chi_{{c2}}()) = 0. Not independent of values for a(2)(chi_{{c1}}(1P)) and a(2)(chi_{{c2}}(1P)) from ARTUSO 2009.


pdgid: M071QBR
text:
Statistical and systematic errors combined. Derived from the reported measurement of b_{{2}}(chi_{{c1}})/b_{{2}}(chi_{{c2}}) = 1.35+-0.72.


pdgid: M071QBR
text:
Statistical and systematic errors combined. Using values from fits with floating M2 amplitudes a(2)(chi_{{c1}}()), a(2)(chi_{{c2}}()), b(2)(chi_{{c1}}()), b(2)(chi_{{c2}}()) and fixed E3 amplitudes of a(3)(chi_{{c2}}()) = b(3)(chi_{{c2}}()) = 0. Not independent of values for b(2)(chi_{{c1}}(1P)) and b(2)(chi_{{c2}}(1P)) from ARTUSO 2009.


pdgid: M053M
text:
Real part of pole location extracted using K-matrix formalism that includes two resonance poles, psi(2S) and psi(3770).


pdgid: M053M
text:
From the joint analysis of the data on the D Dbar and inclusive hadronic cross sections in the psi(3770) region from BaBar, Belle, BES-II, CLEO and KEDR.


pdgid: M053M
text:
Reanalysis of data presented in BAI 2002C. From a global fit over the center-of-mass energy region 3.7 -- 5.0 GeV covering the psi(3770), psi(4040), psi(4160), and psi(4415) resonances. Phase angle fixed in the fit to delta = 0degree.


pdgid: M053W
text:
-2 x imaginary part of pole location extracted using K-matrix formalism that includes two resonance poles, psi(2S) and psi(3770).


pdgid: M053W1
text:
BESSON 2006 (as corrected in BESSON 2010) measure CS(e+ e- --> psi(3770) --> hadrons) = 6.36+-0.08+0.41-0.30 nb at sqrt(s) = 3773+-1 MeV, and obtain Gamma(e e) from the Born-level cross section calculated using psi(3770) mass and width from our 2004 edition, PDG 2004.


pdgid: M053P03
text:
Interference effect between resonance and continuum amplitudes is considered. Two solutions from the fit.


pdgid: M053P04
text:
A fit to the Born cross section of e+ e- --> Lambda Xibar+ K- + c.c. including interference with the continuum. Two solutions from the fit.


pdgid: M053P05
text:
A fit to the Born cross section of e+ e- --> Sigma0 Xibar+ K- + c.c. including interference with the continuum. Two solutions from the fit.


pdgid: M053R1
text:
Obtained by comparing a measurement of the total cross section (corrected in BESSON 2010) with that of D Dbar reported by CLEO in DOBBS 2007.


pdgid: M053R1
text:
From a measurement of CS(e+ e- --> D Dbar) at sqrt(s) = 3773 MeV, using the psi(3770) resonance parameters measured by ABLIKIM 2006L.


pdgid: M053P00
text:
From a fit to the e+ e- --> J/psi X cross section between 3.645 and 3.891 GeV, with psi(2S) and psi(3770) masses, total widths and leptonic widths fixed to the values from the PDG 2020. An alternative fit with an improved chi^2, corresponding to a significance of 5.3 sigma, uses an additional resonance with a mass of 3766.2+-3.8+-0.4 MeV/c**2, a total width of 22.2+-5.9+-1.4 MeV, and Gamma(e e).B(J/psi X) = 79.4+-85.5+-11.7 eV, possibly compatible with the results of ABLIKIM 2008H.


pdgid: M053R8
text:
Incoherent fit. Alternate fits that include interference with background yield results between 11.2+-5.8+-1.1E-4 and 11.6+-6.0+-1.1E-4.


pdgid: M053R82
text:
Comparing cross sections at sqrt(s) = 3.773 GeV and sqrt(s) = 3.671 GeV, neglecting interference, and using CS(psi(3770) --> D Dbar) = 6.39+-0.20 nb.


pdgid: M053R83
text:
ABLIKIM 2023BC fit to e+ e- --> phi eta^' cross sections between 3.508 and 4.951 GeV considering interference between continuum and psi(3770) amplitudes.


pdgid: M053R83
text:
ADAMS 2006 compare cross sections at sqrt(s) = 3.773 GeV and sqrt(s) = 3.671 GeV, neglecting interference, and using CS(psi(3770) --> D Dbar) = 6.39+-0.20 nb.


pdgid: M053R6
text:
Assuming that interference effects between resonance and continuum can be neglected and using sigma**obs(e+ e- --> psi(3770)) = 7.15+-0.38 nb.


pdgid: M053R00
text:
DRUZHININ 2015 uses BABAR and CLEO data takitaking into account interference of the processes e+ e- --> K+ K- and e+ e- --> K0S K0L.


pdgid: M053R3
text:
From the 1sigma contour in the B.R. versus phi (relative phase between the continuum and psi(3770) amplitudes) likelihood scan. Mass, total width and electronic width of psi(3770) fixed at PDG 2022 values.


pdgid: M053R3
text:
Using CS(e+ e- --> psi(3770) --> hadrons) = (6.38+-0.08+0.41-0.30) nb from BESSON 2006 and B(K0S --> pi+ pi-) = 0.6895+-0.0014.


pdgid: M053R98
text:
AAIJ 2017AD reports B(B+ --> psi(3770) K+ --> p pbar K+)/B(B+ --> J/psi K+ --> p pbar K+) < 0.09 (0.10) at 90% (95%) CL.


pdgid: M053R09
text:
Calculated by the authors using CS(e+ e- --> psi(3770) --> hadrons) = 6.36+-0.08+0.41-0.30 nb from BESSON 2010.


pdgid: M053R42
text:
From a measurement of the e+ e- --> Lambda Lambdabar cross section between 3.5 and 4.6 GeV. At a 90% CL the lower bound is >2.4E-6.


pdgid: M053R03
text:
Uses B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c2()) = 9.22+-0.11+-0.46 % from ATHAR 2004, psi(2S) mass and width from PDG 2004, and (psi(2S)) = 2.54+-0.03+-0.11 keV from ADAM 2006.


pdgid: M053R03
text:
Using (psi(2S)) = (2.54+-0.03+-0.11) keV from ADAM 2006 and taking CS(e+ e- --> D Dbar) from HE 2005 for CS(e+ e- --> psi(3770)).


pdgid: M053R02
text:
ABLIKIM 2016B reports 1.94+-0.42+-0.64E-3 from a measurement of [G(psi(3770) --> gamma chi_c1())/G(total)] / [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.55+-0.31E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(1P)) = 9.75+-0.27E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M053R02
text:
ABLIKIM 2014H reports [G(psi(3770) --> gamma chi_c1())/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> K0S K+- pi-+)] = 8.51+-2.39+-1.42E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 0.00349+-0.00031. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. We have calculated the best value of B(chi_c1(1P) --> K0S K+- pi-+) as 1/2 of B(chi_c1(1P) --> Kbar0 K+ pi- + c.c.) =.


pdgid: M053R02
text:
Uses B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c1()) = 9.07+-0.11+-0.54 % from ATHAR 2004, psi(2S) mass and width from PDG 2004, and (psi(2S)) = 2.54+-0.03+-0.11 keV from ADAM 2006.


pdgid: M053R01
text:
ABLIKIM 2016B reports 6.88+-0.28+-0.67E-3 from a measurement of [G(psi(3770) --> gamma chi_c0())/G(total)] / [B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P))] assuming B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.99+-0.27E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(psi(2S) --> gamma chi_c0(1P)) = 9.75+-0.22E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M053R99
text:
ABLIKIM 2014H reports [G(psi(3770) --> gamma eta_c())/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+)] < 16E-6 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 2.38E-2. We have calculated the best value of B(eta_c(1S) --> K0S K+- pi-+) as 1/3 of B(eta_c(1S) --> K Kbar pi) =.


pdgid: M053R20
text:
ABLIKIM 2014H reports [G(psi(3770) --> gamma eta_c(2S))/G(total)] * [B(eta_c(2S) --> K0S K+- pi-+)] < 5.6E-6 which we divide by our best value B(eta_c(2S) --> K0S K+- pi-+) = 6.3E-3. We have calculated the best value of B(eta_c(2S) --> K0S K+- pi-+) as 1/3 of B(eta_c(2S) --> K Kbar pi) =.


pdgid: M212M
text:
Using the measured mass(psi_{{2}}(3823))-mass(psi(2S)) and assuming mass(psi(2S)) = 3686.097 MeV from PDG 2022.


pdgid: M212M
text:
From a simultaneous fit to B+- --> ( chi_c1() gamma ) K+- and B0 --> ( chi_c1() gamma ) K0S with significance 4.0sigma including systematics. Corrected for the measured psi(2S) mass using B --> psi(2S) K --> ( gamma chi_c1() ) K decays.


pdgid: M212M
text:
From a simultaneous unbinned maximum likelihood fit of e+ e- --> pi+ pi- chi_c1() gamma data (the  pi+ pi- recoil mass) taken at sqrt(s) values of 4.23, 4.26, 4.36, 4.42, and 4.60 GeV to  simulated events including both psi(2S) --> chi_c1() gamma and psi_2(3823) --> chi_c1() gamma  together, with floating mass scale offset for psi(2S), floating psi_{{2}}(3823) mass, and zero  psi_{{2}}(3823) width, resulting in a significance of 5.9sigma when including systematic  uncertainties. Superseded by ABLIKIM 22R.


pdgid: M212W
text:
From a fit of e+ e- --> pi0 pi0 chi_c1 gamma data at sqrt(s) values from 4.23 to 4.70 GeV to a  Breit-Wigner function with floating width, using the Bayesian approach.


pdgid: M212W
text:
From a fit of e+ e- --> pi+ pi- chi_c1 gamma data (the pi+ pi- recoil mass) taken at sqrt(s) values of 4.23, 4.26, 4.36, 4.42, and 4.60 GeV to a Breit-Wigner function with the mass fixed from the likelihood fit above, Gaussian resolution smearing, and floating width.


pdgid: M212W
text:
From a simultaneous fit to B+- --> ( chi_c1() gamma ) K+- and B0 --> ( chi_c1() gamma ) K0S with significance 4.0sigma including systematics.


pdgid: M212R00
text:
From a simultaneous unbinned maximum likelihood fit of the pi+ pi- recoil mass distributions of seven decay channels in the process e+ e- --> pi+ pi- X.


pdgid: M212R09
text:
From a simultaneous unbinned maximum likelihood fit of the pi+ pi- recoil mass distributions of  seven decay channels in the process e+ e- --> pi+ pi- X.


pdgid: M212R10
text:
Using the branching ratio for B+ --> psi_2(3823) K+ with psi_2(3823) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi- from AAIJ 2020S.


pdgid: M212R01
text:
From a fit to the e+ e- --> pi+ pi- psi(3823) cross section between 4.23 and 4.70 GeV with two coherent Breit-Wigner resonances. The data is also consistent with a single peak R with mass 4417.5+-26.2+-3.5 MeV and width 245+-48+-13 MeV, which leads to Gamma(e+ e-) B(R --> pi+ pi- psi_2(3823)) B(psi_2(3823) --> chi_c1 gamma) = 0.57+-0.08 eV.


pdgid: M212R01
text:
From a simultaneous unbinned maximum likelihood fit of the pi+ pi- recoil mass distributions of seven decay channels in the process e+ e- --> pi+ pi- X. Signal has a 11.8 sigma  significance.


pdgid: M212R01
text:
BHARDWAJ 2013 reports B(B+- --> psi_2(3823) K+-) x B(psi_2(3823) --> gamma chi_c1()) =  9.7+-2.8+-1.1E-6 with statistical significance 3.8 sigma.


pdgid: M212R02
text:
From a simultaneous unbinned maximum likelihood fit of the pi+ pi- recoil mass distributions of seven decay channels in the process e+ e- --> pi+ pi- X. Signal has a 3.2 sigma significance.


pdgid: M212R02
text:
From a simultaneous unbinned maximum likelihood fit of e+ e- --> pi+ pi- chi_c2 gamma data (the pi+ pi- recoil mass) taken at sqrt(s) values of 4.23, 4.26, 4.36, 4.42, and 4.60 GeV to simulated events including both psi(2S) --> chi_c2 gamma and psi_2(3823) --> chi_c2 gamma together, with floating mass scale offset for psi(2S), psi_{{2}}(3823) mass floating (fixed to that above), and zero psi_{{2}}(3823) width.


pdgid: M212R02
text:
BHARDWAJ 2013 reports B(B+- --> psi_2(3823) K+-) x B(psi_2(3823) --> gamma chi_c2()) < 3.6E-6 at 90% CL.


pdgid: M212R03
text:
From a simultaneous unbinned maximum likelihood fit of e+ e- --> pi+ pi- chi_c1(2)() gamma data (the pi+ pi- recoil mass) taken at sqrt(s) values of 4.23, 4.26, 4.36, 4.42, and 4.60 GeV to simulated events including both psi(2S) --> chi_c1(2)() gamma and psi_2(3823) --> chi_c1(2)() gamma together, with floating mass scale offset for psi(2S), psi_{{2}}(3823) mass floating (fixed to that above), and zero psi_{{2}}(3823) width.


pdgid: M176PP
text:
From simultaneous line shape fits of e+ e- --> gamma chi_c1(3872) --> gamma [ D0 Dbar0 pi0 ] and gamma [ J/psi pi+ pi- ]. The most prominent pole is reported at 7.04+-0.15+0.07-0.08 MeV above the D0 Dbar0 pi0 threshold of 3864.66 MeV on the first sheet with respect to the D^*()0 Dbar0 channel. The uncertainty in the D0 width is included in the uncertainty of the pole mass.


pdgid: M176M
text:
Calculated from mass(chi_{{c1}}(3872))-mass(psi(2S)) = 185.54+-0.06 MeV obtained by combining the data with chi_{{c1}}(3872) produced in B+ decays from AAIJ 2020S and inclusive b-hadron decays from AAIJ 2020AD and using mass(psi(2S)) = 3686.097 MeV. Breit-Wigner parametrization.


pdgid: M176M
text:
The mass difference for the chi_{{c1}}(3872) produced in B+ and B0 decays is (-0.71+-0.96+-0.19) MeV.


pdgid: M176M
text:
A possible equal mixture of two states with a mass difference greater than 3.6 MeV/c**2 is excluded at 95% CL.


pdgid: M176M
text:
Calculated from the corresponding mass(chi_{{c1}}(3872)) - mass(J/psi) using mass(J/psi)=3096.916 MeV.


pdgid: M176M
text:
From a fit of a relativistic S-wave Breit-Wigner convolved with the detector resolution. The width of chi_{{c1}}(3872) is constrained to the PDG 2022 value. Systematic errors not evaluated.


pdgid: M176M
text:
Using chi_{{c1}}(3872) produced in inclusive b-hadron decays and mass(psi(2S)) = 3686.097+-0.010 MeV. Breit-Wigner parametrization. Superseded by the combined value in AAIJ 2020S.


pdgid: M176M
text:
Calculated from the corresponding mass(chi_{{c1}}(3872))-mass(psi(2S)) using mass(psi(2S)) = 3686.093 MeV. Superseded by AUBERT 2008Y.


pdgid: M176M
text:
Calculated from the corresponding mass(chi_{{c1}}(3872))-mass(psi(2S)) using mass(psi(2S)) = 3685.96MeV. Superseded by AUBERT 2006.


pdgid: M176MD0
text:
Calculated from the measured mass(chi_{{c1}}(3872))-mass(D^*()0)-mass(Dbar0) = 1.1+0.6-0.4+0.1-0.3 MeV.


pdgid: M176MD0
text:
Experiments report D^*()0 Dbar0 invariant mass above D^*()0 Dbar0 threshold because D^*()0 decay products are kinematically constrained to the D^*()0 mass, even though the D^*()0 may decay off-shell.


pdgid: M176DM2
text:
Using chi_{{c1}}(3872) produced in inclusive b-hadron decays. Breit-Wigner parametrization. Superseded by the combined value in AAIJ 2020S.


pdgid: M176DM2
text:
Combining mass(chi_{{c1}}(3872))-mass(psi(2S)) = 185.49+-0.06+-0.03 MeV from AAIJ 2020S and the measured mass difference from AAIJ 2020AD. Breit-Wigner parametrization.


pdgid: M176WD0
text:
With a measured value of B(B --> chi_c1(3872) K) x B(chi_c1(3872) --> D^*()0 Dbar0) = 0.80+-0.20+-0.10E-4, assumed to be equal for both charged and neutral modes.


pdgid: M176W1
text:
Fit to cross section using a total width value of 1.19+-0.21 MeV and B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S) ) = (3.8+-1.2)% from PDG 2020.


pdgid: M176W1
text:
ABLIKIM 2015V reports this limit from the measurement of Gamma(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))xGamma(chi_c1(3872) --> e+ e-)/Gamma < 0.13 eV using Gamma(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))/Gamma = 3%.


pdgid: M176W1
text:
Using BAI 1998E data on e+ e- --> pi+ pi- lepton+ lepton-. Assuming that Gamma(pi+ pi- J/psi) of chi_{{c1}}(3872) is the same as that of psi(2S) (85.4 keV).


pdgid: M176G1
text:
Using B(chi_c1(3872) --> J/psi pi+ pi-). B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-). Gamma(chi_c1(3872) --> e+ e-) < 0.37 eV from AUBERT 2005D and B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) = 0.0588+-0.0010 from the PDG 2004.


pdgid: M176G1
text:
Using BAI 1998E data on e+ e- --> pi+ pi- lepton+ lepton-. From theoretical calculation of the production cross section and using B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) = (5.88+-0.10)%.


pdgid: M176H1
text:
Measured in single-tag two-photon production assuming Q^2 dependence of a c cbar meson model. Here, Gamma(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma gamma) is the reduced two-photon decay width, Gammatilde(gamma gamma).


pdgid: M176R30
text:
YIN 2023 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 1.9E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R30
text:
Assuming the decay products, pi+ pi- pi0, are uniformly distributed in phase space.  The limit is the 90% "credible" upper limit (i.e. Bayesian).


pdgid: M176R30
text:
YIN 2023 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0)] < 1.5E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0) = 1.1E-4.


pdgid: M176R6
text:
AAIJ 2020S reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 7.95+-0.15+-0.33E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R6
text:
CHOI 2011 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 8.63+-0.82+-0.52E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R6
text:
AUBERT 2008Y reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 8.4+-1.5+-0.7E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R6
text:
BALA 2015 reports B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi) x B(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K+ pi-) =  7.9+-1.3+-0.4E-6 and B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi) x B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K0 pi+) =  10.6+-3.0+-0.9E-6.


pdgid: M176R6
text:
Superseded by AUBERT 2008Y. AUBERT 2005R reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 1.28+-0.41E-5 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R6
text:
CHOI 2003 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] / [B(B+ --> psi(2S) K+)] / [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] = 0.063+-0.012+-0.007 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4, B(B+ --> psi(2S) K+) = 6.24+-0.21E-4, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.69+-0.34E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: M176R25
text:
WANG 2011B reports B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(3872)) x B(chi_c1 --> pi+ pi- pi0 J/psi) < 2.4E-6 at 95% CL.


pdgid: M176R25
text:
SHEN 2010A reports B(Upsilon(1S) --> gamma chi_c1(3872)) x B(chi_c1 --> pi+ pi- pi0 J/psi) < 2.8E-6 at 95% CL.


pdgid: M176R24
text:
VINOKUROVA 2015 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> omega eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 6.9E-5 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R33
text:
Assuming pure rho contribution only, i.e. excluding the contribution from rho-omega interference. Using B( rho0 --> pi+ pi- ) = 100%.


pdgid: M176R14
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010B reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> omega J/psi(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 6+-2+-1E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010B also reports B(B0 --> chi_c1(3872) K0) x B(chi_c1(3872) --> J/psi omega) = 6+-3+-1E-6.


pdgid: M176R15
text:
AAIJ 2023S reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> omega J/psi(1S))/G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] * [B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-)] = 1.9+-0.4+-0.3E-2 which we divide by our best value B(omega(782) --> pi+ pi-) = 1.53+-0.12E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R15
text:
Statistical and systematic errors added in quadrature. Uses the values of B(B --> chi_c1(3872) K) x B(chi_c1(3872) --> J/psi pi+ pi-) reported in AUBERT 2008Y, taking into account the common systematics.


pdgid: M176R26
text:
AAIJ 2017BB reports B(b --> chi_c1(3872) anything) x B(chi_c1(3872) --> phi phi) < 4.5E-7 at 95% CL.


pdgid: M176R12
text:
GOKHROO 2006 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> D0 Dbar0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 1.02+-0.31+0.21-0.29E-4 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R12
text:
CHISTOV 2004 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> D0 Dbar0 pi0)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 0.6E-4 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R13
text:
HIRATA 2023 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 0.97+0.21-0.18+-0.10E-4 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R13
text:
AUSHEV 2010 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 0.77+-0.16+-0.10E-4 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R13
text:
AUBERT 2008B reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> Dbar^*()0 D0)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 1.67+-0.36+-0.47E-4 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R09
text:
WICHT 2008 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma gamma)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 2.4E-5 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R3
text:
CHISTOV 2004 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> D0 Dbar0)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 6E-5 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R4
text:
CHISTOV 2004 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> D+ D-)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 4E-5 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R23
text:
BHARDWAJ 2019 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi0 chi_c1)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 8.1E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R22
text:
VINOKUROVA 2015 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- eta_c(1S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 3.0E-5 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R00
text:
BHARDWAJ 2016 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- chi_c1)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 1.5E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R03
text:
AAIJ 2017AD reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 0.5E-8 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R03
text:
AAIJ 2013S reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> p pbar)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 1.7E-8 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R7
text:
BHARDWAJ 2011 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 1.78+0.48-0.44+-0.12E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R7
text:
AUBERT 2009B reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 2.8+-0.8+-0.1E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R7
text:
Superseded by AUBERT 2009B. AUBERT,BE 2006M reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 3.3+-1.0+-0.3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R08
text:
BHARDWAJ 2013 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma chi_c1)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 1.9E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R01
text:
BHARDWAJ 2013 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma chi_c2)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 6.7E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R10
text:
From 36.4+-9.0 events of chi_c1(3872) --> J/psi gamma decays with a statistical significance of 4.4sigma.


pdgid: M176R10
text:
AUBERT 2009B reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma psi(2S))/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] = 9.5+-2.7+-0.6E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9+-0.6E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M176R11
text:
AAIJ 2024AD reports this ratio as 1.67+-0.21+-0.12+-0.04 where the last uncertainty is due to the uncertainties of the branching fractions of psi(2S) and J/psi mesons. We have added the last two uncertainties in quadrature.


pdgid: M176R11
text:
From 36.4+-9.0 events of chi_c1(3872) --> J/psi gamma decays with a statistical significance of 4.4sigma. Superseded by AAIJ 2024AD.


pdgid: M176R36
text:
Using B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 0.343+-0.010. We have assumed that B(psi_2(3823) --> gamma chi_c1) = 1.


pdgid: M176R2
text:
IWASHITA 2014 reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> eta J/psi)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 3.8E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M176R2
text:
IWASHITA 2014 also scans the eta J/psi mass range 3.8 -- 4.75 GeV and sets upper limits for B(B+- --> chi_c1(3872) K+-)xB(chi_c1(3872) --> eta J/psi) in 5 MeV intervals.


pdgid: M176R2
text:
AUBERT 2004Y reports [G(chi_c1(3872) --> eta J/psi)/G(total)] * [B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+)] < 7.7E-6 which we divide by our best value B(B+ --> chi_c1(3872) K+) = 1.9E-4.


pdgid: M159M
text:
Obtained from the full amplitude analysis. Parameterized with the relativistic Breit-Wigner line shape.


pdgid: M159M
text:
From a simultaneous chi^2 fit to the distributions of the omega J/psi invariant mass measured by BaBar and Belle in the processes gamma gamma --> omega J/psi and B --> omega J/psi K. LHCb results also taken into account as an additional constraint in the chi^2 calculation.


pdgid: M159M
text:
Could also be X(3940). Significance 3.1sigma. Fit with additional resonance at 3963.7+-5.7 MeV, significance 3.4sigma.


pdgid: M159R03
text:
DEL-AMO-SANCHEZ 2010B reports B(B+- --> chi_c0(3915) K+-) x B(chi_c0(3915) --> J/psi omega) = 3.0+0.7-0.6+0.5-0.3E-5 and B(B0 --> chi_c0(3915) K0) x B(chi_c0(3915) --> J/psi omega) = 2.1+-0.9+-0.3E-5.


pdgid: M159R02
text:
By combining the upper limit B(B --> chi_c0(3915) K) x B(chi_c0(3915) --> D^*()0 Dbar0) < 0.67E-4 from AUSHEV 2010 with the average of CHOI 2005 and AUBERT 2008W measurements B(B --> chi_c0(3915) K) x B(chi_c0(3915) --> omega J/psi) = 0.51+-0.11E-4.


pdgid: M159R08
text:
Assuming that AAIJ 2020AI reporting on B+ --> D+ D- K+ also refers to chi_{{c0}}(3915). The last uncertainty is due to the values of B(D+ --> K- pi+ pi+) and B(D_s()+ --> K- K+ pi+) from PDG 2022.


pdgid: M159R00
text:
VINOKUROVA 2015 reports B(B+ --> K+ chi_c0(3915)) x B(chi_c0(3915) --> eta_c eta) < 4.7E-5 at 90% CL.


pdgid: M159R04
text:
VINOKUROVA 2015 reports B(B+ --> K+ chi_c0(3915)0) x B(chi_c0(3915) --> eta_c pi0) < 1.7E-5 at 90% CL.


pdgid: M159R05
text:
BHARDWAJ 2019 reports B(B+ --> K+ chi_c0(3915)) x B(chi_c0(3915) --> chi_c1 pi0) < 3.8E-5 at 90% CL. A signal significance 2.3 standard deviations.


pdgid: M050M
text:
Obtained from the full amplitude analysis. Parameterized with the relativistic Breit-Wigner line shape. Previous measurements assumed a single state in this region. This analysis revealed the presence of chi_{{c0}}(3930) with the same mass.


pdgid: M072M
text:
Reanalysis of data presented in BAI 2002C. From a global fit over the center-of-mass energy region 3.7 -- 5.0 GeV covering the psi(3770), psi(4040), psi(4160), and psi(4415) resonances. Phase angle fixed in the fit to delta = (130+-46)degree.


pdgid: M072M
text:
Reanalysis of data presented in BAI 2000 and BAI 2002C. From a global fit over the center-of-mass energy 3.8-4.8 GeV covering the psi(4040), psi(4160) and psi(4415) resonances and including interference effects.


pdgid: M072W5
text:
Reanalysis of data presented in BAI 2000 and BAI 2002C. From a global fit over the center-of-mass energy 3.8-4.8 GeV covering the psi(4040), psi(4160) and psi(4415) resonances and including interference effects. Four sets of solutions are obtained with the same fit quality, mass and total width, but with different e+ e- partial widths. We quote only the range of values.


pdgid: M072W2
text:
From a fit to the e+ e- --> mu+ mu- cross section between 3.8 and 4.6 GeV to the coherent sum of four resonant amplitudes assuming Gamma(mu+ mu-) = Gamma(e+ e-).


pdgid: M072W2
text:
From solution 1 of 8 with equal fit quality. Other solutions range from 0.58+-0.52+-0.10 to 0.80+-0.48+-0.13 keV.


pdgid: M072R25
text:
Solution I of two equivalent solutions in a fit using two interfering resonances. Mass and width fixed at 4039 MeV and 80 MeV, respectively.


pdgid: M072R25
text:
Solution II of two equivalent solutions in a fit using two interfering resonances. Mass and width fixed at 4039 MeV and 80 MeV, respectively.


pdgid: M072R14
text:
A precision measurement of the e+ e- --> D0 Dbar0 cross section shows complex structure in this mass region.


pdgid: M072R15
text:
A precision measurement of the e+ e- --> D+ D- cross section shows complex structure in this mass region.


pdgid: M072R34
text:
Solution 1 of two solutions with equal fit quality.  The significance of the psi(4040) signal is 3.6 sigma.


pdgid: M072R34
text:
Solution 2 of two solutions with equal fit quality.  The significance of the psi(4040) signal is 3.6 sigma.


pdgid: M072R03
text:
ABLIKIM 2012K measure CS(e+ e- --> J/psi eta) = 32.1+-2.8+-1.3 pb. They assume the eta J/psi fully originates from psi(4040) decays. Also see ABLIKIM 2024T.


pdgid: M072R04
text:
ABLIKIM 2012K measure CS(e+ e- --> J/psi pi0) <1.6 pb. They assume the eta J/psi fully originates from psi(4040) decays.


pdgid: M072R24
text:
From several values of sqrt(s) near the peak of the psi(4040), PEDLAR 2011 measures CS(e+ e- --> h_c(1P) pi+ pi-) = 1.0+-8.0+-5.4+-0.2 pb, where the errors are statistical, systematic, and due to uncertainty in B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c(1P)), respectively.


pdgid: M193M
text:
From a fit assuming an S-wave relativistic Breit-Wigner shape above a three-body phase-space non-resonant component with statistical significance of more than 5 sigma.


pdgid: M193R01
text:
ABAZOV 2014A reports B(B+ --> chi_c1(4140) K+ --> J/psi phi K+)/B(B+ --> J/psi phi K+)  = (19+-7+-4)% with 3.1 sigma signficance.


pdgid: M193R01
text:
Reported CS(e+ e- --> gamma chi_c1(4140)).B(chi_c1(4140) --> J/psi phi) < 0.35,  0.28, and 0.33 pb at 4.23, 4.26, and 4.36 GeV, respectively, at 90% CL.


pdgid: M193R01
text:
Reported B(B+ --> chi_c1(4140) K+).B(chi_c1(4140) --> J/psi phi)/B(B+ --> J/psi phi K+) < 0.07 at 90% CL.


pdgid: M025M
text:
Reanalysis of data presented in BAI 2002C. From a global fit over the center-of-mass energy region 3.7 -- 5.0 GeV covering the psi(3770), psi(4040), psi(4160), and psi(4415) resonances. Phase angle fixed in the fit to delta = (293+-57)degree.


pdgid: M025W2
text:
From solution 1 of 8 with equal fit quality. Other solutions range from 2.08+-0.99+-0.80 to 2.45+-1.24+-0.94 keV.


pdgid: M025R42
text:
Based on a fit to CS(e+ e- --> eta^' J/psi) from sqrt(s) = 4.18 to 4.60 GeV assuming interfering psi(4160) and psi(4260) contributions. At sqrt(s) = 4.18 GeV, CS(e+ e- --> eta^' J/psi) = 2.4+-0.3+-0.2 pb.


pdgid: M025R48
text:
From a fit to e+ e- --> omega pi+ pi- cross sections between 4 and 4.6 GeV. Recalculated from 12 pi Gamma(e+ e-) B(psi(4230) --> omega pi+ pi-). First uncertainty is from statistical and uncommon systematic uncertainties, and the second is a 6.2% common systematic uncertainty quoted in the paper.


pdgid: M025R00
text:
Solution I of the fit including the psi(4160) with mass 4191+-5 MeV and width 70+-10 MeV from PDG 2016 and the psi(4230) with mass 4219.6+-3.3+-5.1 MeV and width 56.0+-3.6+-6.9 MeV from GAO 2017.


pdgid: M025R00
text:
Solution II of the fit including the psi(4160) with mass 4191+-5 MeV and width 70+-10 MeV from PDG 2016 and the psi(4230) with mass 4219.6+-3.3+-5.1 MeV and width 56.0+-3.6+-6.9 MeV from GAO 2017.


pdgid: M025R53
text:
A fit to the Born cross section of e+ e- --> Lambda Xibar+ K- + c.c. including interference with the continuum. Significance is 4.4sigma. Solution 1 of 2.


pdgid: M025R53
text:
A fit to the Born cross section of e+ e- --> Lambda Xibar+ K- + c.c. including interference with the continuum. Significance is 4.4sigma. Solution 2 of 2.


pdgid: M025R32
text:
Solution I of two equivalent solutions in a fit using two interfering resonances. Mass and width fixed at 4153 MeV and 103 MeV, respectively.


pdgid: M025R32
text:
Solution II of two equivalent solutions in a fit using two interfering resonances. Mass and width fixed at 4153 MeV and 103 MeV, respectively.


pdgid: M025R27
text:
At sqrt(s) = 4170 MeV, PEDLAR 2011 measures CS(e+ e- --> h_c(1P) pi+ pi-) = 15.6+-2.3+-1.9+-3.0 pb, where the errors are statistical, systematic, and due to uncertainty in B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c(1P)), respectively.


pdgid: M025R28
text:
At sqrt(s) = 4170 MeV, PEDLAR 2011 measures CS(e+ e- --> h_c(1P) pi0 pi0) = 3.0+-3.3+-1.1+-0.6 pb, where the errors are statistical, systematic, and due to uncertainty in B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c(1P)), respectively.


pdgid: M025R29
text:
At sqrt(s) = 4170 MeV, PEDLAR 2011 measures CS(e+ e- --> h_c(1P) eta) = 4.7+-1.7+-1.0+-0.9 pb, where the errors are statistical, systematic, and due to uncertainty in B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c(1P)), respectively.


pdgid: M025R30
text:
At sqrt(s) = 4170 MeV, PEDLAR 2011 measures CS(e+ e- --> h_c(1P) pi0) = -0.7+-1.8+-0.7+-0.1 pb, where the errors are statistical, systematic, and due to uncertainty in B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c(1P)), respectively.


pdgid: M025R43
text:
XIAO 2013 reports [G(psi(4160) --> gamma chi_c1(3872))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] < 0.68E-4 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3E-2.


pdgid: M025R43
text:
XIAO 2013 reports [G(psi(4160) --> gamma chi_c1(3872))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi)] < 1.05E-4 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> gamma J/psi) = 10E-3.


pdgid: M025R33
text:
DRUZHININ 2015 uses BABAR and CLEO data taking into account interference of the processes e+ e- --> K+ K- and e+ e- --> K0S K0L.


pdgid: M074M
text:
From a three-resonance fit to the Born cross section in the range sqrt(s) = 3.808 -- 4.951 GeV.  Supersedes ABLIKIM 2020O.


pdgid: M074M
text:
From a cross-section measurement of e+ e- --> D^*()0 D^*()- pi+ between 4.189 and 4.951 GeV, assuming a coherent sum of 3 Breit-Wigner resonances plus a continuum amplitude. The two other resonances have masses (widths) 4675.3+-29.7 (218.3+-73.5) MeV and 4469.1+-26.4 (246.3+-37.9) MeV.


pdgid: M074M
text:
From a two-resonance fit to the dressed cross section in the range sqrt(s) = 4.127 -- 4.600  GeV. The second resonance has a mass of 4484.7+-13.3+-24.1 MeV and a total width of  111.1+-30.1+-15.2 MeV.


pdgid: M074M
text:
Solution 1 of 8 with equal fit quality to the e+ e- --> mu+ mu- cross section between 3.8 and 4.6 GeV to the coherent sum of four resonant amplitudes. Other solutions range from 4212.8+-7.2+-4.0 to 4219.4+-11.2+-4.1 MeV.


pdgid: M074M
text:
From a fit of the measured cross section from sqrt(s) = 4.178 -- 4.278 GeV. Supersedes ABLIKIM 2015C.


pdgid: M074M
text:
From a fit to the cross section for e+ e- --> pi+ pi- psi(2S) --> 2 ( pi+ pi- ) lepton+ lepton-  obtained from 16 center-of-mass energies between 4.008 and 4.600 GeV and comprising 5.1 fb**-1.  Superseded by ABLIKIM 2021AJ.


pdgid: M074M
text:
From a combined fit of BELLE, BABAR and BES3 e+ e- --> pi+ pi- J/psi and e+ e- --> pi+ pi- psi(2S) data.


pdgid: M074M
text:
From a 3-parameter fit of measured cross sections from sqrt(s) = 4.21 -- 4.42 GeV to a phase-space modified Breit-Wigner function, using the decays chi_c0() --> pi+ pi-, chi_c0() --> K+ K-, and omega --> pi+ pi- pi0.


pdgid: M074M
text:
From a single-resonance fit. Two interfering resonances are not excluded. Superseded by LEES 2012AC.


pdgid: M074W
text:
Solution 1 of 8 with equal fit quality to the e+ e- --> mu+ mu- cross section between 3.8 and 4.6 GeV to the coherent sum of four resonant amplitudes. Other solutions range from 36.4+-16.8+-8.1 to 49.6+-22.6+-11.0 MeV.


pdgid: M074W01
text:
From solution 1 of 8 with equal fit quality. Other solutions range from 1.09+-0.84+-0.39 to 1.53+-1.26+-0.54 keV.


pdgid: M074G3
text:
Solution I from a two-resonance fit to the dressed cross section in the range sqrt(s) = 4.127 -- 4.600 GeV. The second resonance has a mass of 4484.7+-13.3+-24.1 MeV, a total width of 111.1+-30.1+-15.2 MeV, and width(ee).B = 1.35+-0.14+-0.07 eV. The phase difference is 1.72+-0.09+-0.52 rad.


pdgid: M074G3
text:
Solution II from a two-resonance fit to the dressed cross section in the range sqrt(s) = 4.127 -- 4.600 GeV. The second resonance has a mass of 4484.7+-13.3+-24.1 MeV, a total width of 111.1+-30.1+-15.2 MeV, and width(ee).B = 0.41+-0.08+-0.13 eV. The phase difference is 5.49+-0.35+-0.58 rad.


pdgid: M074G3
text:
From a fit of the broad K+ K- J/psi enhancement including a coherent psi(4260) amplitude with mass and width from LIU 2013B. Supersedes YUAN 2008. The shape of the cross section observed by ABLIKIM 2018N between 4.2 and 4.3 GeV is incompatible with that of e+ e- --> pi+ pi- J/psi in ABLIKIM 2013T and ABLIKIM 2017B. They also observe a broad enhancement around 4.5 GeV.


pdgid: M074G3
text:
From a fit of the broad K+ K- J/psi enhancement including a coherent psi(4260) amplitude with mass and width from YUAN 2007.


pdgid: M074G02
text:
From a fit of the K0S K0S J/psi mass range from 4.4 to 5.5 GeV including a coherent psi(4260) amplitude with mass and width from LIU 2013B.


pdgid: M074R34
text:
Based on a fit to CS(e+ e- --> eta^' J/psi) from sqrt(s) = 4.18 to 4.60 GeV assuming interfering psi(4160) and psi(4260) contributions. At sqrt(s) = 4.23 GeV, CS(e+ e- --> eta^' J/psi) = 3.6+-0.6+-0.3 pb.


pdgid: M074G7
text:
For constructive interference with the psi(4360) in a combined fit of AUBERT 2007S and WANG 2007D data with three resonances.


pdgid: M074G7
text:
For destructive interference with the psi(4360) in a combined fit of AUBERT 2007S and WANG 2007D data with three resonances.


pdgid: M074G6
text:
AUBERT 2007AK reports [G(psi(4230) --> phi f_0(980) --> phi pi+ pi-) * G(psi(4230) --> e+ e-)/G(total)] * [B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-)] < 0.14 eV which we divide by our best value B(phi(1020) --> K+ K-) = 49.9E-2.


pdgid: M074R65
text:
From a cross-section measurement of e+ e- --> D^*()0 D^*()- pi+ between 4.189 and 4.951 GeV,  assuming a coherent sum of 3 Breit-Wigner resonances plus a continuum amplitude. Depending on  solutions I - VIII with the same fit qualities.


pdgid: M074R56
text:
Not seen in e+ e- --> pi+ pi- eta_c at sqrt(s) = 4.226 GeV with a 90% C.L. upper limit on the cross section of 16.8 pb.


pdgid: M074R55
text:
Seen as a peak in the e+ e- --> pi+ pi- pi0 eta_c cross section with a peak value of 46.1+9.5-9.4+-6.6 pb at sqrt(s) = 4.226 GeV.


pdgid: M074R50
text:
From a fit to the cross section $e^+ e^- rightarrow pi^0 pi^0 J/psi$ at center-of-mass energies between 3.808 and 4.600 GeV.


pdgid: M074R53
text:
From a fit to the cross section for e+ e- --> pi+ pi- psi(2S) --> 2 ( pi+ pi- ) lepton+ lepton- obtained from 16 center-of-mass energies between 4.008 and 4.600 GeV and comprising 5.1 fb**-1.


pdgid: M074R25
text:
At sqrt(s) = 4260 MeV, PEDLAR 2011 measures CS(e+ e- --> h_c(1P) pi+ pi-) = 32+-17+-6+-6 pb, where the errors are statistical, systematic, and due to uncertainty in B(psi(2S) --> pi0 h_c(1P)), respectively.


pdgid: M074R33
text:
Results from a measurement of CS(e+ e- --> D_1(2420) Dbar + c.c.) between sqrt(s) = 4.3 and 4.6 GeV.


pdgid: M074R29
text:
Significance ranges from 4.2 sigma to as low as 1.5 sigma for a flat component plus psi(4260) spectrum. Needs confirmation.


pdgid: M074R57
text:
Not seen in e+ e- --> gamma pi0 eta_c at sqrt(s) = 4.226 GeV with a 90% C.L. upper limit on the cross section of 11.2 pb.


pdgid: M181M
text:
From a three-resonance fit to the Born cross section in the range sqrt(s) = 3.808 -- 4.951 GeV. Supersedes ABLIKIM 2020O.


pdgid: M181M
text:
From a fit to the cross section for e+ e- --> D+ D- pi+ pi- in the range sqrt(s) = 4.190 -- 4.946 GeV.


pdgid: M181M
text:
From a three-resonance fit to the Born cross section in the range sqrt(s) = 3.7730 -- 4.7008 GeV.  Parameters depend on the existence or non-existence of a state near 4.5 GeV.


pdgid: M181M
text:
From a five-resonance fit to the cross section for e+ e- --> gamma gamma J/psi --> gamma gamma lepton+ lepton-.


pdgid: M181M
text:
From a fit to the e+ e- --> pi+ pi- psi(3823) cross section between 4.23 and 4.70 GeV with two coherent Breit-Wigner resonances. The data is also consistent with a single peak with mass 4417.5+-26.2+-3.5 MeV and width 245+-48+-13 MeV.


pdgid: M181G1
text:
Solution I of four equivalent solutions in a fit using three interfering resonances. Supersedes ABLIKIM 2019K.


pdgid: M181G1
text:
Solution II of four equivalent solutions in a fit using three interfering resonances. Supersedes ABLIKIM 2019K.


pdgid: M181G1
text:
Solution III of four equivalent solutions in a fit using three interfering resonances. Supersedes ABLIKIM 2019K.


pdgid: M181G1
text:
Solution IV of four equivalent solutions in a fit using three interfering resonances. Supersedes ABLIKIM 2019K.


pdgid: M181G1
text:
Solution I of two equivalent solutions from a fit using two interfering resonances. Supersedes WANG 2007D.


pdgid: M181G1
text:
Solution II of two equivalent solutions from a fit using two interfering resonances. Supersedes WANG 2007D.


pdgid: M181R06
text:
Observe e+ e- --> pi+ pi- psi(3770) at sqrt(s) = 4.26, 4.36, and 4.42 GeV but cannot establish if continuum or resonant.


pdgid: M181R03
text:
From a fit to the e+ e- --> pi+ pi- psi(3823) cross section between 4.23 and 4.70 GeV with two coherent Breit-Wigner resonances.


pdgid: M181R03
text:
From a fit of e+ e- --> pi+ pi- psi_2(3823), psi_2(3823) --> chi_c1() gamma cross sections taken at sqrt(s) values of 4.23, 4.26, 4.36, 4.42, and 4.60 GeV to the psi(4360) line shape.


pdgid: M181R05
text:
Evidence for e+ e- --> D_1(2420) Dbar + c.c. between sqrt(s) = 4.3 and 4.6 GeV, not necessarily resonant.


pdgid: M073M
text:
Reanalysis of data presented in BAI 2002C. From a global fit over the center-of-mass energy region 3.7 -- 5.0 GeV covering the psi(3770), psi(4040), psi(4160), and psi(4415) resonances. Phase angle fixed in the fit to delta = (234+-88)degree.


pdgid: M073W2
text:
From solution 1 of 8 with equal fit quality. Other solutions range from 1.24+-0.28+-0.35 to 1.27+-0.41+-0.36 keV.


pdgid: M073R13
text:
From a fit of e+ e- --> pi+ pi- psi_2(3823), psi_2(3823) --> chi_c1() gamma cross sections taken at sqrt(s) values of 4.23, 4.26, 4.36, 4.42, and 4.60 GeV to the psi(4415) line shape.


pdgid: M189M
text:
Extracted in a fit that employs two BW resonances. The second one at about 4720 MeV shows low statistical significance of 2.7 sigma.


pdgid: M189M
text:
Extracted from a fit with two BW functions. The second one located at about 4750 MeV show a low statistical significance of 4.3 sigma.


pdgid: M189M
text:
Seen as a peak in the c.m. energy dependence of the e+ e- --> K+ K- J/psi cross section using 5.85 fb^{-1} of data at c.m. energies 4.61 -- 4.95 GeV. Statistical significance is over 5sigma.


pdgid: M189M
text:
Fit model parameterized as the coherent sum of a Breit-Wigner resonance and a continuum amplitude term.


pdgid: M189M
text:
From a cross-section measurement of e+ e- --> D^*()0 D^*()- pi+ between 4.189 and 4.951 GeV,  assuming a coherent sum of 3 Breit-Wigner resonances plus a continuum amplitude. The two other  resonances have masses (widths) 4209.6+-7.5 (81.6+-19.9) MeV and 4469.1+-26.4 (246.3+-37.9) MeV.


pdgid: M189W
text:
From a cross-section measurement of e+ e- --> D^*()0 D^*()- pi+ between 4.189 and 4.951 GeV, assuming a coherent sum of 3 Breit-Wigner resonances plus a continuum amplitude. The two other resonances have masses (widths) 4209.6+-7.5 (81.6+-19.9) MeV and 4469.1+-26.4 (246.3+-37.9) MeV.


pdgid: M189R10
text:
From a cross-section measurement of e+ e- --> D^*()0 D^*()- pi+ between 4.189 and 4.951 GeV, assuming a coherent sum of 3 Breit-Wigner resonances plus a continuum amplitude. Depending on solutions I - VIII with same fit qualities.


pdgid: M189R09
text:
Fit model parameterized as the coherent sum of a Breit-Wigner resonance and a continuum amplitude term. Constructive solution of the interference. Destructive solution gives 0.66+-0.41 eV.


pdgid: M235M
text:
From a 1D fit to the J/psi phi mass distribution with a significance of 5.3 sigma. The  identification of this structure as the chi_{{c0}}(4700) needs confirmation.


pdgid: M235W
text:
From a 1D fit to the J/psi phi mass distribution with a significance of 5.3 sigma. The identification of this structure as the chi_{{c0}}(4700) needs confirmation.


pdgid: M171M
text:
Assuming width(eta_{{b}}(1S)) = 10 MeV. Not independent of the corresponding gamma energy or mass difference measurements.


pdgid: M171M2
text:
Assuming width(eta_{{b}}(1S)) = 10 MeV. Not independent of the corresponding gamma energy or mass measurements.


pdgid: M171DM
text:
Assuming width(eta_{{b}}(1S)) = 10 MeV. Not independent of the corresponding mass or mass difference measurements.


pdgid: M171R01
text:
Obtained using B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma eta_b) = 4.2+1.1-1.0+-0.9E-4 and B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma eta_b) = 4.8+-0.5+-0.6E-4. This limit is equivalent to B(eta_b --> mu+ mu-) = (-0.25+-0.51+-0.33)% measurement.


pdgid: M049M
text:
Reanalysis of MD1 data using the electron mass from COHEN 1987, the radiative corrections from KURAEV 1985 and interference effects.


pdgid: M049R3
text:
BESSON 2007 reports [G(Upsilon(1S) --> tau+ tau-)/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 1.02+-0.02+-0.05 which we multiply by our best value B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 2.48+-0.04E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M049R35
text:
Calculated using the value Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(g g g) = (2.70+-0.01+-0.13+-0.24)% from BESSON 2006A and PDG 2008 values of B(mu+ mu-) = (2.48+-0.05)% and R(hadrons) = 3.51. The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is partially correlated with that of Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(total) measurement of BESSON 2006A.


pdgid: M049R36
text:
Calculated using BESSON 2006A values of Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(g g g) = (2.70+-0.01+-0.13+-0.24)% and Gamma(g g g)/Gamma(total). The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is partially correlated with that of Gamma(g g g)/Gamma(total) measurement of BESSON 2006A.


pdgid: M049P15
text:
For a tetraquark state X_{{tetra}}, with mass in the range 1.16 -- 2.46 GeV and width in the range 0 -- 0.3 GeV. Measured 90% CL limits as a function of X_{{tetra}} mass and width range from 4.4E-6 to 37.8E-6.


pdgid: M049P31
text:
SHEN 2016 reports [G(Upsilon(1S) --> chi_c1(3872) anything)/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] < 9.5E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3E-2.


pdgid: M049P16
text:
For a tetraquark state X_{{tetra}}, with mass in the range 1.16 -- 2.46 GeV and width in the range 0 -- 0.3 GeV. Measured 90% CL limits as a function of X_{{tetra}} mass and width range from 4.6E-6 to 62.4E-6.


pdgid: M049R02
text:
DOBBS 2012A presents individual exclusive branching fractions or upper limits for 100 modes of four to ten pions, kaons, or protons.


pdgid: M049R52
text:
BESSON 2011 reports 4.0+-1.3+-0.6E-5 from a measurement of [G(Upsilon(1S) --> gamma f_2^'(1525))/G(total)] * [B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar)] assuming B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-3.1E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 88.8+-2.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. The result also assumes B(K0S --> pi+ pi-) = (69.20+-0.05)% and B(f_2^'(1525) --> K Kbar) = 4 B(f_2^'(1525) --> K0S K0S).


pdgid: M049R51
text:
Using B(f_2(1270) --> pi0 pi0) = 1/3 B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) and B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = (84.2+2.9-0.9)%.


pdgid: M049R51
text:
Using B(f_2(1270) --> pi0 pi0) = B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi)/3 and B(f_2(1270) --> pi pi) = (84.7+2.5-1.2)%.


pdgid: M049R44
text:
Using B(f_0(1500) --> pi0 pi0) = B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi)/3 and B(f_0(1500) --> pi pi) = (0.349+-0.023)%.


pdgid: M049P29
text:
LEES 2018A quotes B(Upsilon(1S) --> gamma f_0(1500) --> gamma K Kbar) = 2.08+-0.27+-0.65E-5 assuming B(K0 Kbar0) = 1/2 B(K Kbar).


pdgid: M049R50
text:
LEES 2018A quotes B(Upsilon(1S) --> gamma f_0(1710) --> gamma K Kbar) = 2.02+-0.51+-0.35E-5 assuming B(K0 Kbar0) = 1/2 B(K Kbar).


pdgid: M049P28
text:
LEES 2018A quotes B(Upsilon(1S) --> gamma f_0(1710) --> gamma pi pi) = 0.79+-0.26+-0.17E-5 assuming B( pi0 pi0) = 1/3 B( pi pi).


pdgid: M049P32
text:
SHEN 2010A reports [G(Upsilon(1S) --> gamma chi_c1(3872))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] < 1.6E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3E-2.


pdgid: M049R60
text:
For a non-interacting scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with mass mass(A0) < 8.0 GeV. 90% CL upper limits range from 1.9E-6 to 4.5E-6.


pdgid: M049R65
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with 201 < M(mu+ mu-) < 3565 MeV,   excluding J/psi. Measured 90% CL limits as a function of M(mu+ mu-) range from   1 -- 9E-6.


pdgid: M049R65
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with 0.22 < M(A0) < 9.2 GeV, resulting  in 90% CL upper limits ranging from 3.1E-7 at M(A0) = 0.22 GeV to 1.6E-5 at  M(A0) = 9.2 GeV.


pdgid: M049R65
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with mass in the range 0.212 -- 9.2 GeV,  excluding J/psi and psi(2S). Measured 90% CL limits as a function of mass(A0) are  in the range 0.28 -- 9.7E-6.


pdgid: M049R66
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with 2mass(tau) < M(A0) < 9.2 GeV, resulting in 90% CL upper limits of 0.9E-5 at M(A0) = 2mass(tau), ~~1.5E-5 at  M(A0) = 7.5 GeV, and 13E-5 at M(A0) = 9.2 GeV.


pdgid: M049R66
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with 2mass(tau) < M(A0) < 9.2 GeV,  resulting in 90% CL upper limits ranging from 3.8E-6 at M(A0) = 2mass(tau) to 1.5E-4 at M(A0) = 9.2 GeV.


pdgid: M049R66
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with 2mass(tau) < M(A0) < 7.5 GeV,  resulting in 90% CL limits ranging from 1E-5 at M(A0)=2mass(tau) to 5E-5 at  M(A0)=7.5 GeV.


pdgid: M049R03
text:
For a narrow, CP-odd pseudoscalar, A0, searched for in 26 hadronic decay modes with  invariant mass 0.5 GeV < mass(A0) < 9.0 GeV. Measured 90% CL limits as a  function of mass(A0) range from 10**-6 to 10**-2.


pdgid: M049R04
text:
For a narrow, CP-odd pseudoscalar, A0, searched for in 14 hadronic decay modes with  invariant mass 1.5 GeV < mass(A0) < 9.0 GeV. Measured 90% CL limits as a  function of mass(A0) range from 10**-5 to 10**-3.


pdgid: M076R1
text:
LEES 2014M quotes G(chi_b0(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))/G(total) = 7.75+-0.91E-4 combining the results from samples of Upsilon(2S) --> gamma gamma mu+ mu- with and without converted photons. Assumes B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (2.48+-0.05)%.


pdgid: M076R1
text:
LEES 2014M reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] = 7.75+-0.91E-4 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M076R1
text:
KORNICER 2011 reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] = 6.59+-0.96+-0.60E-4 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M076R1
text:
LEES 2011J quotes a central value of G(chi_b0(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))/G(total) = 8.3+-5.6+3.7-2.6E-4.


pdgid: M076R02
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> pi+ pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 6E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R03
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 2E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R04
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 18E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R05
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 8E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R06
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] = 4+-2+-1E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M076R07
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 10E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R08
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 20E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R09
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 3pi+ 2pi- K- K0S pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 6E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R10
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R11
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 22E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R12
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] = 9+-4+-2E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M076R13
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 37E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R14
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 4pi+ 4pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R15
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(1P) --> 4pi+ 4pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 77E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M076R16
text:
SHEN 2012 reports <7.1E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_b0(1P) --> J/psi J/psi)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] assuming B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8+-0.4E-2.


pdgid: M076R17
text:
SHEN 2012 reports <12E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_b0(1P) --> J/psi psi(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] assuming B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8+-0.4E-2.


pdgid: M076R18
text:
SHEN 2012 reports <3.1E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_b0(1P) --> psi(2S) psi(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] assuming B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8+-0.4E-2.


pdgid: M076B02
text:
LEES 2011J quotes a central value of = 8.3+-5.6+3.7-2.6E-4 and derives a 90% CL upper limit of G(chi_b0(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total) < 4.6% using B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) =(3.8+-0.4)%.


pdgid: M077R1
text:
FULSOM 2018 reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 2.45+-0.02+0.11-0.15E-2 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M077R1
text:
LEES 2014M quotes G(chi_b1(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))/G(total) = (2.51+-0.12) % combining the results from samples of Upsilon(2S) --> gamma gamma mu+ mu- with and without converted photons.


pdgid: M077R1
text:
LEES 2014M reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 2.51+-0.12E-2 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M077R1
text:
KORNICER 2011 reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 22.8+-0.4+-1.2E-3 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M077R1
text:
LEES 2011J reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 24.1+-0.6+-1.5E-3 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M077R1
text:
WALK 1986 reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 23.4+-3.63+-2.82E-3 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M077R1
text:
WALK 1986 quotes B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))xB(chi_b1(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) x B(Upsilon(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (5.8+-0.9+-0.7) %.


pdgid: M077R02
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> pi+ pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 14+-3+-3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M077R03
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 9+-3+-2E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M077R04
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] < 42E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9E-2.


pdgid: M077R05
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 55+-9+-14E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M077R06
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 10+-3+-2E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M077R07
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 24+-6+-6E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M077R08
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 59+-14+-17E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M077R09
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 3pi+ 2pi- K- K0S pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 64+-16+-16E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M077R10
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 13+-3+-3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M077R11
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 119+-18+-32E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M077R12
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 18+-4+-4E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M077R13
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 52+-11+-14E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M077R14
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 4pi+ 4pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 18+-4+-5E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M077R15
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(1P) --> 4pi+ 4pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] = 96+-24+-29E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M077R23
text:
For a tetraquark state X_{{tetra}}, with mass in the range 1.16 -- 2.46 GeV and width in the range 0 -- 0.3 GeV. Measured 90% CL limits as a function of X_{{tetra}} mass and width range from 3.3E-5 to 44.4E-5.


pdgid: M077R16
text:
SHEN 2012 reports <2.7E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_b1(1P) --> J/psi J/psi)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] assuming B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2.


pdgid: M077R17
text:
SHEN 2012 reports <1.7E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_b1(1P) --> J/psi psi(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] assuming B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2.


pdgid: M077R18
text:
SHEN 2012 reports <6.2E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_b1(1P) --> psi(2S) psi(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] assuming B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9+-0.4E-2.


pdgid: M077R22
text:
For a tetraquark state X_{{tetra}}, with mass in the range 1.16 -- 2.46 GeV and width in the range 0 -- 0.3 GeV. Measured 90% CL limits as a function of X_{{tetra}} mass and width range from 1.8E-5 to 22.7E-5.


pdgid: M078R1
text:
FULSOM 2018 reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 1.17+-0.01+0.06-0.07E-2 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M078R1
text:
LEES 2014M quotes G(chi_b2(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))/G(total) = (1.32+-0.06)% combining the results from samples of Upsilon(2S) --> gamma gamma mu+ mu- with and without converted photons.


pdgid: M078R1
text:
LEES 2014M reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 1.32+-0.06E-2 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M078R1
text:
KORNICER 2011 reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 1.33+-0.04+-0.07E-2 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M078R1
text:
LEES 2011J reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 13.9+-0.5+0.9-1.1E-3 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M078R1
text:
WALK 1986 reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 17.7+-3.6+-2.0E-3 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M078R1
text:
WALK 1986 quotes B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))xB(chi_b2(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) x B(Upsilon(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (4.4+-0.9+-0.5) %.


pdgid: M078R02
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> pi+ pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 6+-3+-2E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M078R03
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] < 7E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15E-2.


pdgid: M078R04
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 38+-14+-10E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M078R05
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 25+-8+-6E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M078R06
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 8+-2+-2E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M078R07
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 15+-5+-4E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M078R08
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 28+-11+-7E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M078R09
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 3pi+ 2pi- K- K0S pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] < 36E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15E-2.


pdgid: M078R10
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 5+-2+-1E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M078R11
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 73+-16+-20E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M078R12
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] < 6E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15E-2.


pdgid: M078R13
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 26+-8+-7E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M078R14
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 4pi+ 4pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 6+-2+-2E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M078R15
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(1P) --> 4pi+ 4pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] = 132+-31+-40E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M078R16
text:
SHEN 2012 reports <4.5E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_b2(1P) --> J/psi J/psi)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] assuming B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2.


pdgid: M078R17
text:
SHEN 2012 reports <4.9E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_b2(1P) --> J/psi psi(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] assuming B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2.


pdgid: M078R18
text:
SHEN 2012 reports <1.6E-5 from a measurement of [G(chi_b2(1P) --> psi(2S) psi(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] assuming B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15+-0.35E-2.


pdgid: M200M
text:
Assuming width(eta_{{b}}(2S)) = 4.9 MeV. Not independent of the corresponding mass difference measurement.


pdgid: M200M
text:
SANDILYA 2013 (Belle Collab.) search for such a state reconstructed in the same 26 exclusive  hadronic final states as DOBBS 2012 using a sample of 157.8+-3.6E6 Upsilon(2S)  decays or about 17 times larger and find no evidence for a signal. Their 90% C.L. upper limit  on the branching fraction B(Upsilon(2S) --> eta_b(2S) gamma) x  Sum(i)B(eta_b(2S) --> X_i) < 4.9E-6, summed over the exclusive hadronic  final states X_{{i}}, is an order of magnitude smaller than that reported by DOBBS 2012.


pdgid: M200M
text:
Assuming width(eta_{{b}}(2S)) = 5 MeV. Not independent of the corresponding mass difference measurement.


pdgid: M200DM
text:
SANDILYA 2013 (Belle Collab.) search for such a state reconstructed in the same 26 exclusive hadronic final states as DOBBS 2012 using a sample of 157.8+-3.6E6 Upsilon(2S) decays or about 17 times larger and find no evidence for a signal. Their 90% C.L. upper limit on the branching fraction B(Upsilon(2S) --> eta_b(2S) gamma) x Sum(i)B(eta_b(2S) --> X_i) < 4.9E-6, summed over the exclusive hadronic final states X_{{i}}, is an order of magnitude smaller than that reported by DOBBS 2012.


pdgid: M052M
text:
Obtained by reanalysing ARGUS and Crystal Ball data (BARBER 1984), but not authored by the ARGUS and Crystal Ball collaboration.


pdgid: M052R4
text:
LEES 2011C reports [G(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> Upsilon(2S) anything)] = 1.78+-0.02+-0.11E-2 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> Upsilon(2S) anything) = 10.6+-0.8E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M052R4
text:
Using B(Upsilon(2S) --> e+ e-) = (1.91+-0.16)%, B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = (1.93+-0.17)% and, (Upsilon(2S)) = 0.612+-0.011 keV.


pdgid: M052R3
text:
BESSON 2007 reports [G(Upsilon(2S) --> tau+ tau-)/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 1.04+-0.04+-0.05 which we multiply by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = 1.93+-0.17E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M052R10
text:
TAMPONI 2013 reports [G(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi0)/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi+ pi-)] < 2.3E-4 which we multiply by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi+ pi-) = 17.85E-2.


pdgid: M052R6
text:
TAMPONI 2013 reports [G(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) eta)/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi+ pi-)] = 1.99+-0.14+-0.11E-3 which we multiply by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi+ pi-) = 17.85+-0.26E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M052R69
text:
For a tetraquark state X_{{tetra}}, with mass in the range 1.16 -- 2.46 GeV and width in the range 0 -- 0.3 GeV. Measured 90% CL limits as a function of X_{{tetra}} mass and width range from 4.4E-6 to 36.7E-6.


pdgid: M052R01
text:
Calculated using the value Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(g g g) = (3.18+-0.04+-0.22+-0.41)% from BESSON 2006A and PDG 2008 values of B(pi+ pi- Upsilon(1S)) = (18.1+-0.4)%, B(pi0 pi0 Upsilon(1S)) = (8.6+-0.4)%, B(mu+ mu-) = (1.93+-0.17)%, and R(hadrons) = 3.51. The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is partially correlated with that of Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(total) measurement of BESSON 2006A.


pdgid: M052R70
text:
For a tetraquark state X_{{tetra}}, with mass in the range 1.16 -- 2.46 GeV and width in the range 0 -- 0.3 GeV. Measured 90% CL limits as a function of X_{{tetra}} mass and width range from 7.8E-6 to 64.7E-6.


pdgid: M052R81
text:
WANG 2011B reports [G(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_c1(3872))/G(total)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] < 0.8E-6 which we divide by our best value B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3E-2.


pdgid: M052R06
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, excluding known resonances, with mass in the range 0.3 -- 7 GeV. Measured 90% CL limits as a function of mass(A0) range from 1E-6 to 8E-5.


pdgid: M052R24
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with mass in the range 212 -- 9300 MeV, excluding J/psi and psi(2S). Measured 90% CL limits as a function of mass(A0) range from 0.26 -- 8.3E-6.


pdgid: M079R2
text:
LEES 2014M reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] = 7.7+-1.6E-4 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M079R2
text:
Recalculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) x B(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S)) = (0.28+-0.12+-0.03)% using B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = (1.44+-0.10)%. Supersedes HEINTZ 1991.


pdgid: M079R2
text:
LEES 2011J quotes a central value of G(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))/G(total) = (-0.3+-0.2+0.5-0.4)%.


pdgid: M079R2
text:
Using B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = (1.37+-0.26)%, B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma gamma Upsilon(2S))*2 B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) < 1.19E-4, and B(Upsilon(3S) --> chi_b0(2P) gamma) = 0.049.


pdgid: M079R1
text:
LEES 2014M reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] = 2.1+-1.0E-4 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9+-0.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M079R1
text:
LEES 2014M quotes G(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))/G(total) = 2.1+-1.0E-4 combining the results from Upsilon(3S) --> gamma gamma mu+ mu- samples with and without photon conversions.


pdgid: M079R1
text:
Recalculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) x B(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) = (0.05+-0.04+-0.01)% using B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (2.57+-0.05)%. Supersedes HEINTZ 1991.


pdgid: M079R1
text:
LEES 2011J quotes a central value of G(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))/G(total) = 3.9+-2.2+1.2-0.6E-4.


pdgid: M079R1
text:
Using B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (2.57+-0.07)%, B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma gamma Upsilon(1S))*2 B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) < 0.63E-4, and B(Upsilon(3S) --> chi_b0(2P) gamma) = 0.049.


pdgid: M079R02
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> pi+ pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 2E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R03
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R04
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 13E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R05
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 14E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R06
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 9E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R07
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 13E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R08
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 63E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R09
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 3pi+ 2pi- K- K0S pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 39E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R10
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 4E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R11
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 72E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R12
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 9E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R13
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 43E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R14
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 4pi+ 4pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 10E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079R15
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b0(2P) --> 4pi+ 4pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))] < 38E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = 5.9E-2.


pdgid: M079B01
text:
LEES 2011J quotes a central value of G(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))/G(total) = 3.9+-2.2+1.2-0.6E-4 and derives a 90% CL upper limit of B(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) < 1.2% using B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = (5.9+-0.6)%.


pdgid: M079A02
text:
Calculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) xB(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) = (0.05+-0.04+-0.01)% using B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) =(2.57+-0.05)%.


pdgid: M079B02
text:
LEES 2011J quotes a central value of G(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P))/G(total) = (-0.3+-0.2+0.5-0.4)% and derives a 90% CL upper limit of B(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S)) < 2.8% using B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) = (5.9+-0.6)%.


pdgid: M079A03
text:
Calculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(2P)) xB(chi_b0(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S)) = (0.28+-0.12+-0.03)% using B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) =(1.44+-0.10)%.


pdgid: M080R3
text:
Using B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = (11.3+-0.6)% and B(Upsilon(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 2 B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 2 (2.48+-0.06)%.


pdgid: M080R2
text:
LEES 2014M reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 2.66+-0.22E-2 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M080R2
text:
LEES 2014M quotes G(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))/G(total) = (2.66+-0.22)% combining the results from  Upsilon(3S) --> gamma gamma mu+ mu- samples with and without photon conversions.


pdgid: M080R2
text:
LEES 2011J reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 2.4+-0.1+-0.2E-2 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M080R2
text:
CRAWFORD 1992B quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) xB(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S)) x 2 B(Upsilon(2S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (10.23+-1.20+-1.26) E-4.


pdgid: M080R2
text:
Recalculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) xB(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S)) = (2.29+-0.23+-0.21) % using B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = (1.44+-0.10)%. Supersedes HEINTZ 1991.


pdgid: M080R1
text:
LEES 2014M reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 13.48+-0.72E-3 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M080R1
text:
LEES 2014M quotes G(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))/G(total) = 13.48+-0.72E-3 combining the results from samples of Upsilon(3S) --> gamma gamma mu+ mu- with and without converted photons.


pdgid: M080R1
text:
LEES 2011J reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 12.4+-0.3+-0.6E-3 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M080R1
text:
CRAWFORD 1992B quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) xB(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) x 2 B(Upsilon(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (6.47+-1.12+-0.82) E-4.


pdgid: M080R1
text:
Recalculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) x B(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) = (0.91+-0.11+-0.06)% using B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (2.57+-0.05)%. Supersedes HEINTZ 1991.


pdgid: M080R4
text:
LEES 2011C measures B(Upsilon(3S) --> chi_b1(2P) X) x B(chi_b1(2P) --> chi_b1(1P) pi+ pi-) = 1.16+-0.07+-0.12E-3. We derive the value assuming B(Upsilon(3S) --> chi_b1(2P) X) = B(Upsilon(3S) --> chi_b1(2P) gamma) =.


pdgid: M080R4
text:
CAWLFIELD 2006 quote Gamma(chi_b(2P) --> pi pi chi_b(1P)) = 0.83+-0.22+-0.08+-0.19 keV assuming I-spin conservation, no D-wave contribution, Gamma(chi_b1(2P)) = 96+-16keV, and Gamma(chi_b2(2P)) = 138+-19 keV.


pdgid: M080R02
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> pi+ pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 39+-8+-9E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M080R03
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 14+-5+-3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M080R04
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 97+-30+-26E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M080R05
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 74+-16+-19E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M080R06
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 12+-4+-3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M080R07
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 69+-13+-17E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M080R08
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 121+-29+-33E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M080R09
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 3pi+ 2pi- K- K0S pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 85+-23+-22E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M080R10
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 15+-4+-3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M080R11
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 150+-30+-40E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M080R12
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 25+-7+-6E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M080R13
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 77+-17+-21E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M080R14
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 4pi+ 4pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 22+-6+-5E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M080R15
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b1(2P) --> 4pi+ 4pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))] = 241+-47+-72E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) = 12.6+-1.2E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M080A00
text:
CRAWFORD 1992B quotes 2xB(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_bJ(2P)) B(chi_bJ(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(nS)) B(Upsilon(nS) --> lepton+ lepton-).


pdgid: M080A00
text:
Calculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) xB(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) = (0.91+-0.11+-0.06)% using B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) =(2.57+-0.05)%.


pdgid: M080A01
text:
Calculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P))xB(chi_b1(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S)) = (2.29+-0.23+-0.21) % usingB(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = (1.44+-0.10)%.


pdgid: M081R3
text:
Using B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = (11.4+-0.8)% and B(Upsilon(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = 2 B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 2 (2.48+-0.06)%.


pdgid: M081R2
text:
LEES 2014M reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 1.12+-0.13E-2 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M081R2
text:
LEES 2014M quotes G(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))/G(total) = (1.12+-0.13)% combining the results from samples of Upsilon(3S) --> gamma gamma mu+ mu- with and without converted photons.


pdgid: M081R2
text:
LEES 2011J reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 1.1+-0.1+-0.1E-2 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M081R2
text:
CRAWFORD 1992B quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(2P)) xB(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S)) x 2 B(Upsilon(2S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (4.98+-0.94+-0.62) E-4.


pdgid: M081R2
text:
Recalculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) xB(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S)) = (1.90+-0.23+-0.18) % using B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = (1.44+-0.10)%. Supersedes HEINTZ 1991.


pdgid: M081R1
text:
LEES 2014M reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 8.03+-0.50E-3 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M081R1
text:
LEES 2014M quotes G(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total) * G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))/G(total)  = 8.03+-0.50E-3 combining the results from samples of Upsilon(3S) --> gamma gamma mu+ mu- with and without converted photons.


pdgid: M081R1
text:
LEES 2011J reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 9.2+-0.3+-0.4E-3 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M081R1
text:
CRAWFORD 1992B quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) xB(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) x 2 B(Upsilon(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-) = (5.03+-0.94+-0.63) E-4.


pdgid: M081R1
text:
Recalculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) xB(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) =(0.77+-0.11+-0.05)% using B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (2.57+-0.05)%. Supersedes HEINTZ 1991.


pdgid: M081R4
text:
0.64+-0.05+-0.08E-3. We derive the value assuming B(Upsilon(3S) --> chi_b2(2P) X) = B(Upsilon(3S) --> chi_b2(2P) gamma) =.


pdgid: M081R02
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> pi+ pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] < 14E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1E-2.


pdgid: M081R03
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] < 12E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1E-2.


pdgid: M081R04
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 2pi+ pi- K- K0S 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] < 87E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1E-2.


pdgid: M081R05
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 51+-16+-13E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M081R06
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 12+-4+-3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M081R07
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 32+-11+-8E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M081R08
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 2pi+ 2pi- K+ K- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 62+-23+-17E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M081R09
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 3pi+ 2pi- K- K0S pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] < 58E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1E-2.


pdgid: M081R10
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 12+-4+-3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M081R11
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 159+-33+-43E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M081R12
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 19+-7+-5E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M081R13
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 3pi+ 3pi- K+ K- pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 55+-16+-15E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M081R14
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 4pi+ 4pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 12+-5+-3E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M081R15
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(chi_b2(2P) --> 4pi+ 4pi- 2pi0)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))] = 165+-46+-50E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) = 13.1+-1.6E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M081A01
text:
Calculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P))xB(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) =(0.77+-0.11+-0.05)% usingB(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (2.57+-0.05)%.


pdgid: M081A02
text:
Calculated by us. HEINTZ 1992 quotes B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(2P)) xB(chi_b2(2P) --> gamma Upsilon(2S)) = (1.90+-0.23+-0.18) % using B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = (1.44+-0.10)%.


pdgid: M048R8
text:
Using B(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) gamma gamma) = (0.038+-0.007)%, and B(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi0 pi0) = (1/2)B(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi+ pi-).


pdgid: M048R8
text:
Using B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = (1.31+-0.21)%, B(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) gamma gamma)x2B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (0.188+-0.035)%, and B(Upsilon(2S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi0 pi0)x2B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (0.436+-0.056)%. With the assumption of e mu universality.


pdgid: M048R4
text:
Using B(Upsilon(1S) --> e+ e-) = (2.38+-0.11)%, B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (2.48+-0.05)%, and (Upsilon(3S)) = 0.443+-0.008 keV.


pdgid: M048R3
text:
Using B(Upsilon(2S) --> e+ e-) = (1.91+-0.16)%, B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = (1.93+-0.17)%, and (Upsilon(3S)) = 0.443+-0.008 keV.


pdgid: M048R28
text:
Using B(Upsilon(1S) --> e+ e-) = (2.38+-0.11)%, B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (2.48+-0.05)%, B(Upsilon(2S) --> e+ e-) = (1.91+-0.16)%, and B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = (1.93+-0.17)%. Not independent of other values reported by AUBERT 2008BP.


pdgid: M048R11
text:
Using B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = (2.57+-0.07)% and assuming e mu universality. Supersedes HEINTZ 1991.


pdgid: M048R03
text:
Assuming M(h_{{b}}(1P)) = 9900 MeV and Gamma(h_{{b}}(1P)) = 0 MeV, and allowing B(h_b(1P) --> gamma eta_b(1S)) to vary from 0 -- 100%.


pdgid: M048R18
text:
BESSON 2007 reports [G(Upsilon(3S) --> tau+ tau-)/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(3S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 1.05+-0.08+-0.05 which we multiply by our best value B(Upsilon(3S) --> mu+ mu-) = 2.18+-0.21E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M048R30
text:
Calculated using BESSON 2006A value of Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(g g g) = (2.72+-0.06+-0.32+-0.37)% and the PDG 2008 values of B(Upsilon(2S) + anything) = (10.6+-0.8)%, B(pi+ pi- Upsilon(1S)) = (4.40+-0.10)%, B(pi0 pi0 Upsilon(1S)) = (2.20+-0.13)%, B(gamma chi_b2(2P)) = (13.1+-1.6)%, B(gamma chi_b1(2P)) = (12.6+-1.2)%, B(gamma chi_b0(2P)) = (5.9+-0.6)%, B(gamma chi_b0(1P)) = (0.30+-0.11)%,B(mu+ mu-) = (2.18+-0.21)%, and R(hadrons) = 3.51. The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is partially correlated with Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(total) BESSON 2006A value.


pdgid: M048R31
text:
Calculated using BESSON 2006A values of Gamma(gamma g g)/Gamma(g g g) = (2.72+-0.06+-0.32+-0.37)% and Gamma(g g g)/Gamma(total). The statistical error is negligible and the systematic error is partially correlated with Gamma(g g g)/Gamma(total) BESSON 2006A value.


pdgid: M048R21
text:
KORNICER 2011 reports [G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))/G(total)] * [B(chi_b2(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))] = 1.435+-0.162+-0.169E-3 which we divide by our best value B(chi_b2(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) = 18.0+-1.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M048R21
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P))] < 27.1E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b2(1P)) = 7.15E-2.


pdgid: M048R21
text:
HEINTZ 1992, while unable to distinguish between different J states, measures Sum(J)B(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_bJ()) x B(chi_bJ() --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) = 1.7+-0.4+-0.6E-3 for J = 0,1,2 using inclusive Upsilon(1S) decays and 1.2+0.4-0.3+-0.09E-3 for J = 1,2 using Upsilon(1S) --> lepton+ lepton-.


pdgid: M048R22
text:
KORNICER 2011 reports [G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))/G(total)] * [B(chi_b1(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S))] = 5.38+-1.20+-0.95E-4 which we divide by our best value B(chi_b1(1P) --> gamma Upsilon(1S)) = 35.2+-2.0E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M048R22
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P))] < 2.5E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b1(1P)) = 6.9E-2.


pdgid: M048R15
text:
ASNER 2008A reports [G(Upsilon(3S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))/G(total)] / [B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P))] < 21.9E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> gamma chi_b0(1P)) = 3.8E-2.


pdgid: M048R04
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with mass in the range 212 -- 9300 MeV, excluding J/psi and psi(2S). Measured 90% CL limits as a function of mass(A0) range from 0.27 -- 5.5E-6.


pdgid: M048R29
text:
For a narrow scalar or pseudoscalar, A0, with M(tau+ tau-) in the ranges 4.03 -- 9.52 and 9.61 -- 10.10 GeV. Measured 90% CL limits as a function of M(tau+ tau-) range from 1.5 -- 16E-5.


pdgid: M206M
text:
Systematic error includes an additional 0.5 MeV for the uncertainty on the Upsilon(3S) mass. Also measures mass(chi_{{b2}}(3P))-mass(chi_{{b1}}(3P)) = 10.60+-0.64+-0.17 MeV. A total of 372 chi_{{b1}}(3P) and chi_{{b2}}(3P) events was observed.


pdgid: M206M
text:
From chi_b1(3P) --> Upsilon(1S,2S) gamma transitions assuming mass(chi_{{b2}}(3P))-mass(chi_{{b1}}(3P)) = 10.5+-1.5 MeV and allowing for +-30% variation in the chi_{{b2}}(3P) production rate relative to that of chi_{{b1}}(3P).


pdgid: M206M
text:
The mass of the chi_{{b1}}(3P) state obtained by combining the results of AAIJ 2014BG with that of AAIJ 2014BI. The first uncertainty is experimental and the second attributable to the unknown mass splitting, assumed to be mass(chi_{{b2}}(3P))-mass(chi_{{b1}}(3P)) = 10.5+-1.5 MeV.


pdgid: M206M
text:
From chi_b1(3P) --> Upsilon(3S) gamma transition assuming mass(chi_{{b2}}(3P))-mass(chi_{{b1}}(3P)) = 10.5+-1.5 MeV.


pdgid: M047R13
text:
ARTUSO 2005B reports [G(Upsilon(4S) --> D_s()+ anything + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 8.0+-0.2+-0.9E-3 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M047R12
text:
Direct measurement. This value is averaged with the value extracted from the Gamma(B+ B-) / Gamma(B0 Bbar0) measurements.


pdgid: M047R7
text:
SOKOLOV 2009 reports [G(Upsilon(4S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 0.211+-0.030+-0.014E-5 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 2.48+-0.04E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M047R7
text:
SOKOLOV 2007 reports [G(Upsilon(4S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 4.42+-0.81+-0.56E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 2.48+-0.04E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M047R7
text:
Superseded by AUBERT 2008BP. AUBERT 2006R reports [G(Upsilon(4S) --> Upsilon(1S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 2.23+-0.25+-0.27E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(1S) --> mu+ mu-) = 2.48+-0.04E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M047R9
text:
Superseded by AUBERT 2008BP. AUBERT 2006R reports [G(Upsilon(4S) --> Upsilon(2S) pi+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-)] = 1.69+-0.26+-0.20E-6 which we divide by our best value B(Upsilon(2S) --> mu+ mu-) = 1.93+-0.17E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M047R01
text:
From the upper limit on the ratio of CS(e+ e- --> h_b(1P) pi+ pi-) at the Upsilon(4S) to that at the Upsilon(5S) of 0.27.


pdgid: M243M
text:
From a simultaneous fit to the Upsilon(nS) pi+ pi-, n = 1, 2, 3, cross sections at 28 energy points within sqrt(s) = 10.63 -- 11.02 GeV, including the initial-state radiation at Upsilon(10860).


pdgid: M243M
text:
From a fit to the dressed cross sections of AUBERT 2009E by BaBar and SANTEL 2016 by Belle above 10.68 GeV with a coherent sum of a continuum amplitude and three Breit-Wigner functions with constant widths.


pdgid: M243R00
text:
Reported as the range 0.12 -- 0.47 eV obtained from multiple solutions of an amplitude fit within a model composed as a sum of Breit-Wigner functions.


pdgid: M243R02
text:
Reported as the range 0.53 -- 1.22 eV obtained from multiple solutions of an amplitude fit within a model composed as a sum of Breit-Wigner functions.


pdgid: M243R03
text:
Reported as the range 0.21 -- 0.26 eV obtained from multiple solutions of an amplitude fit within a model composed as a sum of Breit-Wigner functions.


pdgid: M243R05
text:
A fit solution with constructive interference. The other solution corresponding to destructive interference gives a value of 2.01+-0.38+-0.76 eV.


pdgid: M243R06
text:
A fit solution with constructive interference. The other solution corresponding to destructive interference gives a value of 1.32+-0.44+-0.55 eV.


pdgid: M092M
text:
From a simultaneous fit to the Upsilon(nS) pi+ pi-, n = 1, 2, 3, cross sections at 28 energy points within sqrt(s) = 10.6 -- 11.05 GeV, including the initial-state radiation at Upsilon(10860).


pdgid: M092M
text:
From a simultaneous fit to the h_b(nP) pi+ pi-, n = 1, 2 cross sections at 22 energy points within sqrt(s) = 10.77 -- 11.02 GeV to a pair of interfering Breit-Wigner amplitudes modified by phase space factors, with eight resonance parameters (a mass and width for each of Upsilon(10860) and Upsilon(11020),  a single relative phase, a single relative amplitude, and two overall normalization factors, one for each n). The systematic error estimate is dominated by possible interference with a small nonresonant continuum amplitude.


pdgid: M092M
text:
Not including uncertain and potentially large systematic errors due to assumed continuum amplitude 1/sqrt(s) dependence and related interference contributions.


pdgid: M092M
text:
From a fit to the total hadronic cross sections measured at 60 energy points within sqrt(s) = 10.82 -- 11.05 GeV to a pair of interfering Breit-Wigner amplitudes and two floating continuum amplitudes with 1/sqrt(s) dependence, one coherent with the resonances and one incoherent, with six resonance parameters (a mass, width, and an amplitude for each of Upsilon(10860) and Upsilon(11020), one relative phase, and one decoherence coefficient).


pdgid: M092M
text:
From a simultaneous fit to the Upsilon(nS) pi+ pi-, n = 1, 2, 3, cross sections at 25energy points within sqrt(s) = 10.6 -- 11.05 GeV to a pair of interfering Breit-Wigner amplitudesmodified by phase space factors, with fourteen resonance parameters (a mass, width, and threeamplitudes for each of Upsilon(10860) and Upsilon(11020), a single universal relativephase, and three decoherence coefficients, one for each n). Continuum contributions weremeasured (and therefore fixed) to be zero.


pdgid: M092M
text:
In a model where a flat non-resonant b bbar-continuum is incoherently added to a second flat component interfering with two Breit-Wigner resonances. Systematic uncertainties not estimated.


pdgid: M092M
text:
In a model where a flat nonresonant Upsilon(1S,2S,3S) pi+ pi- continuum interferes with a single Breit-Wigner resonance.


pdgid: M092M
text:
In a model where a non-resonant b bbar-continuum represented by a threshold function at sqrt(s)=2mass(B) is incoherently added to a flat component interfering with two Breit-Wigner resonances. Not independent of other AUBERT 2009E results. Systematic uncertainties not estimated.


pdgid: M092R50
text:
Reported as the range 0.75 -- 1.43 eV obtained from multiple solutions of an amplitude fit within a model composed as a sum of Breit-Wigner functions.


pdgid: M092R51
text:
Reported as the range 1.35 -- 3.80 eV obtained from multiple solutions of an amplitude fit within a model composed as a sum of Breit-Wigner functions.


pdgid: M092R52
text:
Reported as the range 0.43 -- 1.03 eV obtained from multiple solutions of an amplitude fit within a model composed as a sum of Breit-Wigner functions.


pdgid: M092R01
text:
Supersedes ARTUSO 2005B. Combining inclusive phi, D_{{s}}, and B measurements. Using B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.4+-0.6% from PDG 2006.


pdgid: M092R19
text:
The ratios N(B_s^*() Bbar_s^*()) / N(B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) and N(B^*_s() Bbar_s()0) / N(B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) are measured with a correlation coefficient of -0.72.


pdgid: M092R19
text:
From a measurement of CS(e+ e- --> B_s^*() Bbar_s^*()) / CS(e+ e- --> B_s^(*)() Bbar_s^(*)()) at sqrt(s) = 10.86 GeV.


pdgid: M092R36
text:
Assuming that all the b bbar events are from Upsilon(5S) resonance decays and using CS(e+ e- --> b bbar) = 0.340+-0.016 nb from ESEN 2013. Correlated with other results from HE 2014.


pdgid: M092R47
text:
Assuming that all the b bbar events are from Upsilon(5S) resonance decays and using CS(e+ e- --> b bbar) = 0.340+-0.016 nb from ESEN 2013. Correlated with other results from HE 2014. For a state X_{{b}} with mass between 10.55 GeV/c**2 and 10.65 GeV/c**2, the obtained 90% upper limit as a function of mass(X_{{b}}) varies from 2.6E-5 to 3.8E-5.


pdgid: M092R02
text:
ARTUSO 2005B reports [G(Upsilon(10860) --> D_s()  anything + c.c.)/G(total)] * [B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+)] = 0.0198+-0.0019+-0.0038 which we divide by our best value B(D_s()+ --> phi pi+) = 4.5+-0.4E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: M093W
text:
From a simultaneous fit to the Upsilon(nS) pi+ pi-, n=1, 2, 3, cross sections at 25energy points within sqrt(s) = 10.6 -- 11.05 GeV to a pair of interfering Breit-Wigner amplitudesmodified by phase space factors, with fourteen resonance parameters (a mass, width, and threeamplitudes for each of Upsilon(10860) and Upsilon(11020), a single universal relativephase, and three decoherence coefficients, one for each n). Continuum contributions weremeasured (and therefore fixed) to be zero.


pdgid: M093R04
text:
Reported as the range 0.38 -- 0.54 eV obtained from multiple solutions of an amplitude fit within a model composed as a sum of Breit-Wigner functions.


pdgid: M093R05
text:
Reported as the range 0.13 -- 1.16 eV obtained from multiple solutions of an amplitude fit within a model composed as a sum of Breit-Wigner functions.


pdgid: M093R06
text:
Reported as the range 0.17 -- 0.49 eV obtained from multiple solutions of an amplitude fit within a model composed as a sum of Breit-Wigner functions.


pdgid: M250M
text:
Obtained from the full amplitude analysis. Parameterized with the relativistic Breit-Wigner line shape. Also confirmed by the model-independent analysis of AAIJ 2020AF.


pdgid: M269M
text:
From an amplitude analysis of B0 --> Dbar0 D_s()+ pi-. A simultaneous fit to B0 --> Dbar0 D_s()+ pi- and B- --> D- D_s()+ pi+ assuming isospin symmetry yields a mass of 2908+-11+-20 MeV.


pdgid: M269M++
text:
From an amplitude analysis of B- --> D- D_s()+ pi+. A simultaneous fit to B0 --> Dbar0 D_s()+ pi- and  B- --> D- D_s()+ pi+ assuming isospin symmetry yields a mass of 2908+-11+-20 MeV.


pdgid: M269W
text:
From an amplitude analysis of B0 --> Dbar0 D_s()+ pi-. A simultaneous fit to B0 --> Dbar0 D_s()+ pi- and B- --> D- D_s()+ pi+ assuming isospin symmetry yields a width of 136+-23+-13 MeV.


pdgid: M269W++
text:
From an amplitude analysis of B- --> D- D_s()+ pi+. A simultaneous fit to B0 --> Dbar0 D_s()+ pi- and  B- --> D- D_s()+ pi+ assuming isospin symmetry yields a width of 136+-23+-13 MeV.


pdgid: M265DM
text:
The fit uses a relativistic P-wave Breit-Wigner function without taking into account the D0 D^*()+ threshold. Parameters are shown to be biased in AAIJ 2022Z. The significance for mass(T_{{c c}}()+)-(mass(D^*()+) + mass(D0)) < 0 is 4.3 sigma.


pdgid: M265W
text:
The fit uses a relativistic P-wave Breit-Wigner function without taking into account the D0 D^*()+ threshold. The fit uses a relativistic P-wave Breit-Wigner function. Parameters are shown to be biased in AAIJ 2022Z.


pdgid: M210M
text:
For M**2(pi+ pi-) < 0.65 GeV**2. Obtained by analyzing CLEO-c data but not authored by the CLEO Collaboration.


pdgid: M210M
text:
The signal of the T_c_cbar_1(3900) is correlated with a parent J/psi pi+ pi- system in the invariant mass range 4.2 -- 4.7 GeV. Superseded by ABAZOV 2019.


pdgid: M210R01
text:
ADOLPH 2015D measure B(T_c_cbar_1(3900)+- --> J/psi pi+-) CS(gamma N --> T_c_cbar_1(3900)+- N)/CS(gamma N --> J/psi N) < 3.7E-3 at 90% CL.


pdgid: M210R12
text:
Using e+ e- --> pi-+ ( T_c_cbar_1(3900)+- --> J/psi pi+- ) cross section at 4.23 and 4.26 GeV from ABLIKIM 2017J.


pdgid: M259M
text:
From an amplitude analysis of the decay B0 --> J/psi phi K0S with a significance of 4.0 sigma. The mass difference with respect to the charged partner in AAIJ 2021E is -12+11-10+6-4 MeV.


pdgid: M259M
text:
Pole mass for a mass-, width-dependent Breit-Wigner fit to the mass spectrum recoiling against K(S)0 at center of mass energies between 4.628 and 4.699 GeV, with a significance of 4.6 sigma.


pdgid: M259M
text:
Pole mass for a mass-dependent Breit-Wigner fit to the mass spectrum recoiling against K+ at center of mass energies between 4.628 and 4.698 GeV, with a significance of 5.3 sigma.


pdgid: M259W
text:
Pole width for a mass-, width-dependent Breit-Wigner fit to the mass spectrum recoiling against K(S)0 at center of mass energies between 4.628 and 4.699 GeV, with a significance of 4.6 sigma.


pdgid: M259W
text:
Pole width for a mass-dependent Breit-Wigner fit to the mass spectrum recoiling against $K^+$ at  center of mass energies between 4.628 and 4.698 GeV, with a significance of 5.3 sigma.


pdgid: M259R00
text:
Seen in the spectrum recoiling against K+ in e+ e- --> K+ ( D_s()- D^*()0 + D_s^*()- D0 ) collisions at center of mass energies between 4.628 and 4.698 GeV, with a significance of 5.3 sigma.


pdgid: M259R03
text:
Seen in the mass spectrum recoiling against K(S)0 at center of mass energies between 4.628 and 4.699 GeV, with a significance of 4.6 sigma.


pdgid: M213R00
text:
VINOKUROVA 2015 reports B(B+ --> K+ T_c_cbar(4020)0) x B(T_c_cbar --> eta_c pi+ pi-) < 1.6E-5 at 90% CL.


pdgid: M213R05
text:
Using e+ e- --> pi-+ ( Z_c(4020)+- --> h_c(1P) pi+- ) cross section at 4.23, 4.26 and 4.36 GeV from ABLIKIM 2013X.


pdgid: M191R01
text:
With a product branching fraction measurement of B(Bbar0 --> K- T_c_cbar(4050)+) x B(T_c_cbar(4050)+ --> pi+ chi_c1(1P)) = 3.0+1.5-0.8+3.7-1.6E-5.


pdgid: M191R01
text:
With a product branching fraction limit of B(Bbar0 --> T_c_cbar(4050)+ K-) x B(T_c_cbar(4050)+ --> chi_c1() pi+) < 1.8E-5 at 90% CL.


pdgid: M223M
text:
Statistical error only, with significance of 5.9 sigma (from a fit with a 19% CL). Identified as the same structure observed in ABLIKIM 2017V in e+ e- --> pi+ pi- psi(2S) decays.


pdgid: M223M
text:
Statistical error only, with significance of 9.2 sigma. From an unbinned maximum likelihood fit of the pi+ pi- psi(2S) Dalitz plot from data collected at sqrt(s) = 4.416 GeV for a J**C = 1+ state. The fit does not match the detailed structure of the data, having a C.L. of only 8%.


pdgid: M240R01
text:
AAIJ 2018AN quotes a fit fraction for B0 --> T_c_cbar(4100)- K+ --> eta_c(1S) pi- K+ of (3.3+-1.1+1.2-1.1)% from an amplitude analysis.


pdgid: M216M
text:
From a 4-dimensional analysis when a second, lower mass resonance is allowed in the T_{{{c cbar 1}}}(4430) fit, with significance 6 sigma including systematic variations.


pdgid: M216R01
text:
From a 4-dimensional analysis when a second, lower mass resonance is allowed in the T_{{{c cbar 1}}}(4430) fit. No partial branching fraction quoted.


pdgid: M192R01
text:
With a product branching fraction measurement of B(Bbar0 --> K- T_c_cbar(4250)+) x B(T_c_cbar(4250)+ --> pi+ chi_c1(1P)) = 4.0+2.3-0.9+19.7-0.5E-5.


pdgid: M192R01
text:
With a product branching fraction limit of B(Bbar0 --> T_c_cbar(4250)+ K-) x B(T_c_cbar(4250)+ --> chi_c1() pi+) < 4.0E-5 at 90% CL.


pdgid: M195R01
text:
From a four-dimensional amplitude analysis. Measured a product of branching fractions B(B0 --> T_c_cbar_1(4430)- K+)xB(T_c_cbar_1(4430)- --> psi(2S) pi-) = 6.0+1.7-2.0+2.5-1.4E-5.


pdgid: M195R01
text:
AUBERT 2009AA quotes B(B+ --> Kbar0 T_c_cbar_1(4430)+) x B(T_c_cbar_1(4430)+ --> pi+ psi(2S)) < 4.7E-5 and B(Bbar0 --> K- T_c_cbar_1(4430)+) x B(T_c_cbar_1(4430)+ --> pi+ psi(2S)) < 3.1E-5 at 95% CL.


pdgid: M195R01
text:
Measured a product of branching fractions B(Bbar0 --> K- T_c_cbar_1(4430)+) x B(T_c_cbar_1(4430)+ --> pi+ psi(2S)) = 3.2+1.8-0.9+5.3-1.6E-5. Superseded by CHILIKIN 2013.


pdgid: M195R02
text:
CHILIKIN 2014 reports B(Bbar0 --> T_c_cbar_1(4430)+ K-) x B(T_c_cbar_1(4430)+ --> J/psi pi+) = 5.4+4.0-1.0+1.1-0.9E-6.


pdgid: M195R02
text:
A broad enhancement seen by AAIJ 2019R in the decays B0 --> J/psi pi+ K- at 4600 MeV can be due to an interplay of T_{{{c cbar 1}}}(4430), T_{{{c cbar 1}}}(4200) and the fitting polynomials.


pdgid: M195R02
text:
AUBERT 2009AA quotes B(B+ --> Kbar0 T_c_cbar_1(4430)+) x B(T_c_cbar_1(4430)+ --> pi+ J/psi) < 1.5E-5 and B(Bbar0 --> K- T_c_cbar_1(4430)+) x B(T_c_cbar_1(4430)+ --> pi+ J/psi) < 0.4E-5 at 95% CL.


pdgid: M232M
text:
Assumes T_b_sbar(5568)+- --> B_s pi+- decay. If T_b_sbar(5568)+- --> B_s^* pi+- decay is assumed, the mass shifts upward by 49 MeV.


pdgid: M232R01
text:
Seen in p pbar collisions at 1.96 TeV at a rate of (8.6+-1.9+-1.4)% relative to inclusive B_{{s}} production in the kinematic region 10 < pT(B_{{s}}) < 30 GeV/c, with B_{{s}} mesons reconstructed in decays to J/psi phi.An alternative possibility, T_b_sbar(5568)+- --> B_s^* pi+- with a missing gamma, could not be ruled out.


pdgid: M232R01
text:
Not seen in 24.4 fb**-1 of p p collision data at sqrt(s) = 7 and 8 TeV with B_{{s}} mesons reconstructed in decays to J/psi phi. An upper limit on the production rate times branching fraction for T_b_sbar(5568)+- --> B_s pi+- relative to inclusive B_{{s}} production is less than 1.5% at pT(B_{{s}}) > 10 GeV/c and less than 1.6% at pT(B_{{s}}) > 15 GeV/c at 95% CL.


pdgid: M232R01
text:
Not seen in 9.6 fb**-1 of p pbar collision data at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV with B_{{s}} mesons reconstructed in decays to J/psi phi. An upper limit on the production rate times branching fraction for T_b_sbar(5568)+- --> B_s pi+- relative to inclusive B_{{s}} production is less than 6.7% at 95% CL.


pdgid: M232R01
text:
Not seen in 19.7 fb**-1 of p p collisions data at sqrt(s) = 8 TeV with B_{{s}} mesons reconstructed in decays to J/psi phi. An upper limit on the production rate times branching fraction for T_b_sbar(5568)+- --> B_s pi+- relative to inclusive B_{{s}} production is less than 1.1% at pT(B_{{s}}) > 10 GeV/c and less than 1.0% at pT(B_{{s}}) > 15 GeV/c at 95%CL.


pdgid: M232R01
text:
Not seen in 3 fb**-1 of p p collision data at sqrt(s) = 7 and 8 TeV in a scan over the T_{{{b sbar}}}(5568) mass and width, with B_{{s}} mesons reconstructed in decays to D_s()- pi+ or J/psi phi. An upper limit on the production rate times branching fraction for T_b_sbar(5568)+- --> B_s pi+- relative to inclusive B_{{s}} production is less than 2.1% at pT(B_{{s}}) > 10 GeV/c at 90% CL.


pdgid: M268M
text:
In a model with three resonances described by interfering relativistic Breit-Wigner functions above background from non-resonant single and double parton scattering and a threshold enhancement. The other two resonances have masses 6652+-10+-12, 7287+20-18+-5 MeV and widths 124+32-26+-33, 95+59-40+-19 MeV, respectively.


pdgid: M268M
text:
In a model with two resonances, one describing the broad structure above threshold (mass 6650+-20+30-20 MeV, width 440+-50+60-50 MeV) interfering with single parton scattering, and a non-interfering T_{{c c cbar cbar}}(6900).


pdgid: M268M
text:
In a model where the broad structure above threshold interferes with non-resonant single parton scattering. Without interference the mass is 6905+-11+-7 MeV.


pdgid: M268M
text:
Assuming a single resonance (could be another state). A 3sigma signal is observed for an additional resonance with mass 7220+-30+10-40 MeV and width 90+-60+60-50 MeV.


pdgid: M268W
text:
In a model where the broad structure above threshold interferes with non-resonant single parton scattering. Without interference the width is 80+-38 MeV.


pdgid: M207M0
text:
From a simultaneous fit to the KROKOVNY 2013 Dalitz analysis of e+ e- --> Upsilon(2S)/Upsilon(3S) pi0 pi0 decays with fixed width Gamma(T_b_bbar_1(10610)0) = 18.4 MeV.


pdgid: M207R01
text:
Assuming the T_b_bbar_1(10610) decay width is saturated by the channels pi+ Upsilon(1S,2S,3S), pi+ h_b(1P,2P), and B+ Bbar^*()0 + Bbar0 B^*()+, and using the results from BONDAR 2012 and MIZUK 2016.


pdgid: M207R10
text:
Combined significance in e+ e- --> Upsilon(2S)/Upsilon(3S) pi0 pi0, including systematics, of 6.5sigma.


pdgid: M207R00
text:
Assuming the T_b_bbar_1(10610) decay width is saturated by the channels pi+ Upsilon(1S,2S,3S), pi+ h_b(1P,2P), and B+ Bbar^*()0 + B^*()+ Bbar0, and using the results from BONDAR 2012 and MIZUK 2016. Using the mass and width of the T_b_bbar_1(10610) from BONDAR 2012.


pdgid: M207R07
text:
Combined with the results of BONDAR 2012 and MIZUK 2016. Not independent from T_b_bbar_1(10610) branching fractions to pi+ Upsilon(1S,2S,3S),  pi+ h_b(1P,2P), and B+ Bbar^*()0 + Bbar0 B^*()+.


pdgid: M208R01
text:
Assuming the T_b_bbar_1(10650) decay width is saturated by the channels pi+ Upsilon(1S,2S,3S), pi+ h_b(1P,2P), and B^*()+ Bbar^*()0, and using the results from BONDAR 2012 and MIZUK 2016.


pdgid: M208R06
text:
Assuming the T_b_bbar_1(10650) decay width is saturated by the channels pi+ Upsilon(1S,2S,3S), pi+ h_b(1P,2P), and B^*()+ Bbar^*()0, and using the results from BONDAR 2012 and MIZUK 2016. Using the mass and width of the T_b_bbar_1(10650) from BONDAR 2012.


pdgid: M208R07
text:
Combined with the results of BONDAR 2012 and MIZUK 2016. Not independent from T_b_bbar_1(10650) branching fractions to pi+ Upsilon(1S,2S,3S), pi+ h_b(1P,2P), and B^*()+ Bbar^*()0.


pdgid: M300J98
text:
K-matrix pole from combined analysis of pi- p --> pi0 pi0 n, pi- p --> K Kbar n, pbar p --> pi0 pi0 pi0, pi0 eta eta, pi0 pi0 eta at rest.


pdgid: M300J08
text:
A broad peak observed at K+ K- invariant mass. Mass and width above are its pole position. The observed branching ratio is B(J/psi --> X pi0) B(X --> K+ K-) = 8.5+-0.6+2.7-3.6E-4.


pdgid: M300J01
text:
Signal observed with a statistical significance >20sigma comes from 3883 candidate events. Spin parity determined to be J**P = 1+ with a statistical significance >5sigma over 0**-**, 1**-**, 2**+** hypotheses, and in the range within 3.1 -- 7.5 sigma with respect to 2**-**.


pdgid: M300J01
text:
From a fit in the region M(p Lambdabar)-M(p)-M(Lambda) < 150 MeV. S-wave in the p Lambdabar system preferred. A similar near-threshold enhancement in the p Lambdabar system is observed in B+ --> p Lambdabar Dbar()0 by CHEN 2011F.


pdgid: M300J48
text:
From a partial wave analysis of J/psi --> gamma phi phi, for which the primary signal is eta(2225) --> phi phi, and that also finds significant signals for for **0**-+ phase space, f_{{0}}(2100), f_{{2}}(2010), f_{{2}}(2300), f_{{2}}(2340), and a previously unseen **0**-+ state X(2500) (M = 2470+15-19+101-23 MeV, Gamma = 230+64-35+56-33 MeV).


pdgid: M300K43
text:
From a fit with more than 5sigma to the Born cross section line shapes of e+ e- --> rho pi and e+ e- --> rho(1450) pi.


pdgid: M300A05
text:
Fit of the tensor partial waves from BES3 in the multipole basis. Might be a cluster of  J**PC = 2++ resonances. The ratio of decay widths K K- / pi pi is 0.23+-0.05.


pdgid: M300K26
text:
From the combined analysis of ANISOVICH 1999C, ANISOVICH 1999F, ANISOVICH 1999J, ANISOVICH 1999K, and ANISOVICH 2000B. See also ANISOVICH 2012.


pdgid: M300K22
text:
From the combined analysis of ANISOVICH 1999C, ANISOVICH 1999E, ANISOVICH 2001F, and ANISOVICH 2001G.


pdgid: M300J18
text:
From the combined analysis of pbar p --> eta eta eta from ANISOVICH 2000M and pbar p --> eta pi0 pi0 from ANISOVICH 2000J.


pdgid: M300J54
text:
Dominant decay into rho0 rho0 pi+. BALTAY 1978 finds confirmation in 2pi+ pi- 2pi0 events which contain rho+ rho0 pi0 and 2rho+ pi-.


pdgid: M300J09
text:
A similar enhancement in the Lambda_c^+() pbar final state is also reported by BABAR collaboration in AUBERT 2010H.


pdgid: M300K39
text:
Assuming one single Breit-Wigner resonance in omega chi_c2(1P) (chi_c2 --> gamma J/psi). Measured width(e e).B(omega chi_c1(1P)) = 1.86+-0.32+-0.13 eV.


pdgid: M300K39
text:
From a cross-section measurement of e+ e- --> D^*()0 D^*()- pi+ between 4.189 and 4.951 GeV, assuming a coherent sum of 3 Breit-Wigner resonances plus a continuum amplitude. Gamma(e+ e-).B(D^*()0 D^*()- pi+) = 107 -- 1744 eV depending on solutions I - VIII with the same fit qualities. The two other resonances have masses (widths) 4209.6+-7.5 (81.6+-19.9) MeV and 4675.3+-29.7 (218.3+-73.5) MeV.


pdgid: M300K39
text:
ABLIKIM 2022AU cross sections analysis of the process e+ e- --> K+ K- J/psi at c.m. energies 4.127 -- 4.600 GeV from 15.6 fb^{-1} of data.


pdgid: S016AMU
text:
FINK 2021 simultaneously measure the cyclotron frequencies of an H_{{2}}()+ ion and a deuteron in a coupled magnetron orbit. The proton mass is extracted using the precise deuteron mass value.


pdgid: S016AMU
text:
The 2018 CODATA combination in TIESINGA 2021 includes data from HEISSE 2017, but does not include updates in HEISSE 2019, which superseded HEISSE 2017. Consequently, we do not average HEISSE 2019 and TIESINGA 2021. Updating the 2018 CODATA combination to use HEISSE 2019 would shift the central value for the proton mass upwards by less than half a standard deviation. Therefore, we take the 2018 CODATA result in TIESINGA 2021 as the recommended value for the proton mass.


pdgid: S016AMU
text:
The value is an update of HEISSE 2017; the result is shifted by 1.5E-11 u, corresponding to 0.45 sigma due to the corrected motional temperatures of the particles. The statistical and total systematic uncertainties are given as 16 and 29 in the last two digits.


pdgid: S016AMU
text:
The statistical and systematic errors are 15 and 29 in the last two places of the value. Superseded by HEISSE 2019.


pdgid: S016DM
text:
HORI 2001, HORI 2003, HORI 2006, and HORI 2011 use the more-precisely-known constraint on the pbar charge-to-mass ratio of GABRIELSE 1999 (see below) to get their results. Their results are not independent of the HORI 2001, HORI 2003, HORI 2006, and HORI 2011 values for |q(p)+q(pbar)|/e, below.


pdgid: S016DM
text:
TORII 1999 uses the more-precisely-known constraint on the pbar charge-to-mass ratio of GABRIELSE 1995 (see below) to get this result. This is not independent of the TORII 1999 value for |q(p)+q(pbar)|/e, below.


pdgid: S016CMR
text:
Equation (2) of GABRIELSE 1995 should read M(pbar)/M(p) = 0.999 999 995 (11) (G. Gabrielse, private communication).


pdgid: S016CMR
text:
GABRIELSE 1990 also measures mass(pbar)/mass(e-) = 1836.152660+-0.000083 and mass(p)/mass(e-) = 1836.152680+-0.000088. Both are completely consistent with the 1986 CODATA (COHEN 1987) value for mass(p)/mass(e-) of 1836.152701+-0.000037.


pdgid: S016DQ2
text:
HORI 2001, HORI 2003, HORI 2006, and HORI 2011 use the more-precisely-known constraint on the pbar charge-to-mass ratio of GABRIELSE 1999 (see above) to get their results. Their results are not independent of the HORI 2001, HORI 2003, HORI 2006, and HORI 2011 values for |mass(p)-mass(pbar)|/mass(p), above.


pdgid: S016DQ2
text:
TORII 1999 uses the more-precisely-known constraint on the pbar charge-to-mass ratio of GABRIELSE 1995 (see above) to get this result. This is not independent of the TORII 1999 value for |mass(p)-mass(pbar)|/mass(p), above.


pdgid: S016DQ
text:
BRESSI 2011 uses the method of DYLLA 1973 but finds serious errors in that experiment that greatly reduce its accuracy. The BRESSI 2011 limit assumes that n --> p e- nu_e conserves charge. Thus the limit applies equally to the charge of the neutron.


pdgid: S016DQ
text:
SENGUPTA 2000 uses the difference between the observed rate of of rotational energy loss by the binary pulsar PSR B1913+16 and the rate predicted by general relativity to set this limit. See the paper for assumptions.


pdgid: S016EDM
text:
SAHOO 2017 and DMITRIEV 2003 are not direct measurements of the proton electric dipole moment. They use theory to calculate this limit from the limit on the electric dipole moment of the Hg199 atom.


pdgid: S016EDM
text:
This WILKENING 1984 value is more cautious than the other and excludes the finite-size effect, which relies on uncertain nuclear integrals.


pdgid: S016EPL
text:
MORNACCHI 2022 perform the first simultaneous extraction of the six leading-order proton polarizabilities using fixed-t subtracted dispersion relations and a bootstrap-based fitting technique.


pdgid: S016EPL
text:
BEANE 2003 uses effective field theory and low-energy gamma p and gamma d Compton-scattering data. It also gets for the isoscalar polarizabilities (see the erratum) alpha(N)= 13.0+-1.9+3.9-1.5E-4 fm**3 and beta(N)= -1.8+-1.9+2.1-0.9E-4 fm**3.


pdgid: S016EPL
text:
BLANPIED 2001 gives alpha_{{p}}+beta_{{p}} and alpha_{{p}}-beta_{{p}}. The separate alpha_{{p}} and beta_{{p}} are provided to us by A. Sandorfi. The first error above is statistics plus systematics; the second is from the model.


pdgid: S016EPL
text:
This OLMOSDELEON 2001 result uses the TAPS data alone, and does not use the (re-evaluated) sum-rule constraint that alpha+beta= 13.8+-0.4E-4 fm**3. See the paper for a discussion.


pdgid: S016EPL
text:
MACGIBBON 1995 combine the results of ZIEGER 1992, FEDERSPIEL 1991, and their own experiment to get a ``global average'' in which model errors and systematic errors are treated in a consistent way. See MACGIBBON 1995 for a discussion.


pdgid: S016EPL
text:
PASQUINI 2019 fit data sets for the unpolarized proton RCS cross section, using fixed-t subtracted dispersion relations and a bootstrap-based fitting technique.


pdgid: S016EPL
text:
BARANOV 2001 combines the results of 10 experiments from 1958 through 1995 to get a global average that takes into account both systematic and model errors and does not use the theoretical constraint on the sum alpha(p)+beta(p).


pdgid: S016EPL
text:
FEDERSPIEL 1991 obtains for the (static) electric polarizability alpha_{{p}}, defined in terms of the induced electric dipole moment by D = 4piepsilon(0)alpha_{{p}}E, the value (7.0+-2.2+-1.3)*10**-4 fm**3.


pdgid: S016CR
text:
BEZGINOV 2019 measures the 2S_{{1/2}} to 2P_{{1/2}} transition frequency in atomic hydrogen using the frequency-offset separated oscillatory field (FOSOF) technique. The result agrees well with the muonic hydrogen Lamb shift value.


pdgid: S016CR
text:
CUI 2021 employ a new mathematical procedure (statistical SPM, Schlessinger point method)  based on form-unbiased interpolations of existing e p scattering data.


pdgid: S016CR
text:
MIHOVILOVIC 2021 reports a value of 0.878+-0.011+-0.031+-0.002 fm where the last uncertainty comes from the dependence on the model form factor function.


pdgid: S016CR
text:
FLEURBAEY 2018 measures the 1S-3S transition frequency in hydrogen and in combination with the 1S-2S transition frequency deduces the proton radius and the Rydberg constant.


pdgid: S016CR
text:
The BEYER 2017 result is 3.3 combined standard deviations below the MOHR 2016 (2014 CODATA) value. The experiment measures the 2S-4P transition in hydrogen and gets the proton radius and the Rydberg constant.


pdgid: S016MCR
text:
In a consistent reanalysis LEE 2015 extract values separately for the Mainz 2010 data only (0.776+-0.034+-0.017) fm and for the world data without Mainz data (0.914+-0.035) fm. The quoted value is a simple combination of the two, which ignores possible discrepancies and unknown correlations and should be considered with caution.


pdgid: S016MCR
text:
CUI 2021B employ a new mathematical procedure (statistical SPM, Schlessinger point method) based on form-unbiased interpolations of existing e p scattering data.


pdgid: S016T
text:
ALLEGA 2022 look for gamma rays from the de-excitation of a residual  N15*** following the disappearance of p in O16.


pdgid: S016T
text:
ALLEGA 2022 look for gamma rays from the de-excitation of a residual   O15*** following the disappearance of n in O16.


pdgid: S016T
text:
AGOSTINI 2024A look for gamma rays from the de-excitation of a residual As75*** following the disappearance of p in Ge76 (through the  transition chain Ge76 --> Ga75 --> Ge75 --> As75).


pdgid: S016T
text:
AGOSTINI 2024A look for gamma rays from the de-excitation of a residual As75*** following the disappearance of n in Ge76 (through the transition chain Ge76 --> Ge75 --> As75).


pdgid: S016T
text:
AHMED 2004 and ANDERSON 2019A look for gamma rays from the de-excitation of a residual O15*** or N15*** following the disappearance of a neutron or proton in O16.


pdgid: S016T
text:
ARAKI 2006 looks for signs of de-excitation of the residual nucleus after disappearance of a neutron from the s shell of C12.


pdgid: S016T
text:
BACK 2003 looks for decays of unstable nuclides left after N decays of parent C12, C13, O16 nuclei. These are ``invisible channel'' limits.


pdgid: S016T
text:
ZDESENKO 2003 gets this limit on proton disappearance in deuterium by analyzing SNO data in AHMAD 2002.


pdgid: S016T
text:
AHMAD 2002 (see its footnote 7) looks for neutrons left behind after the disappearance of the proton in deuterons.


pdgid: S016T
text:
BERNABEI 2000B looks for the decay of a (53)**128I nucleus following the disappearance of a proton in the otherwise-stable (54)**129Xe nucleus.


pdgid: S016T
text:
This mean-life limit has been obtained from a half-life limit by dividing the latter by ln(2) = 0.693.


pdgid: S016T
text:
EVANS 1977 looks for the daughter nuclide Xe129 from possible Te130 decays in ancient Te ore samples.


pdgid: S016T
text:
FLEROV 1958 looks for the spontaneous fission of a Th232 nucleus after the disappearance of one of its nucleons.


pdgid: S016TA
text:
GEER 2000D uses agreement between a model of galactic pbar production and propagation and the observed pbar/p cosmic-ray spectrum to set this limit.


pdgid: S016T10
text:
In estimating the background, this HIRATA 1989C limit (as opposed to the later limits of WALL 2000B and MCGREW 1999) does not take into account present understanding that the flux of nu_{{mu}} originating in the upper atmosphere is depleted. Doing so would reduce the background and thus also would reduce the limit here.


pdgid: S016T09
text:
MATSUMOTO 2022 limit >4500E30 is derived from the latest dataset SKA IV phase (from 2008 to 2018) with 0.20 Mton.years of exposure.


pdgid: S016T09
text:
MATSUMOTO 2022 limit >3600E30 is derived from a combination of all datasets SKA I,II, III and IV phase (from 1996 to 2018) with a total of 0.37 Mton.years of exposure. Note, the limit from only SKA IV is stronger, because there were some events observed in SKA II.


pdgid: S016T11
text:
This ALLISON 1998 limit is with no background subtraction; with subtraction the limit becomes >46E30 years.


pdgid: S016T21
text:
The SUZUKI 1993B limit applies to any of nu_e nu_e nubar_e, nu_mu nu_mu nubar_mu, or nu_tau nu_tau nubar_tau.


pdgid: S016T21
text:
GLICENSTEIN 1997 uses Kamioka data and the idea that the disappearance of the neutron's magnetic moment should produce radiation.


pdgid: S016T21
text:
The first BERGER 1991B limit is for n --> nu_e nu_e nubar_e, the second is for n --> nu_mu nu_mu nubar_mu.


pdgid: S016T83
text:
ARAKI 2006 looks for signs of de-excitation of the residual nucleus after disappearance of two neutrons from the s shell of C12.


pdgid: S016T83
text:
ALLEGA 2022 and ANDERSON 2019A look for gamma rays from the de-excitation of a residual O14*** following the disappearance of n n in O16.


pdgid: S016T83
text:
TRETYAK 2004 uses data from an old Homestake-mine radiochemical experiment on limits for invisible decays of K39 to Ar37.


pdgid: S016T83
text:
BACK 2003 looks for decays of unstable nuclides left after N N decays of parent C12, C13, O16 nuclei. These are ``invisible channel'' limits.


pdgid: S016T83
text:
BERNABEI 2000B looks for the decay of a (54)**127Xe nucleus following the disappearance of an n n pair in the otherwise-stable (54)**129Xe nucleus. The limit here applies as well to n n --> nu_mu nubar_mu, n n --> nu_tau nubar_tau, or any ``disappearance'' mode.


pdgid: S016T77
text:
ALLEGA 2022 and ANDERSON 2019A look for gamma rays from the de-excitation of a  residual N14*** following the disappearance of p n in O16.


pdgid: S016T76
text:
ALLEGA 2022 look for gamma rays from the de-excitation of a  residual  C14*** following the disappearance of p p in O16. Supersedes ANDERSON 2019A result.


pdgid: S016T76
text:
BERNABEI 2000B looks for the decay of a (52)**127Te nucleus following the disappearance of a p p pair in the otherwise-stable (54)**129Xe nucleus.


pdgid: S017M
text:
We use the 1998 CODATA u-to-MeV conversion factor (see the heading above) to get this mass in MeV from the much more precisely measured KESSLER 1999 value of 1.00866491637+-0.00000000082 u.


pdgid: S017M
text:
The mass is known much more precisely in u: m = 1.0086649235+-0.0000000023 u. We use the 1986 CODATA conversion factor to get the mass in MeV.


pdgid: S017M1
text:
This is a corrected result (see the erratum). The error is statistical. The maximum systematic error is 0.029 MeV.


pdgid: S017D
text:
Calculated by us from the MOHR 2008 ratio mass(n)/mass(p) = 1.00137841918(46). In u, mass(n)-mass(p) = 1.38844920(46)*10**-3 u.


pdgid: S017D
text:
Calculated by us from the MOHR 2005 ratio mass(n)/mass(p) = 1.00137841870+-0.00000000058. In u, mass(n)-mass(p) = 1.3884487+-0.0000006E-3 u.


pdgid: S017D
text:
Calculated by us from the MOHR 1999 ratio mass(n)/mass(p) = 1.00137841887+-0.00000000058. In u, mass(n)-mass(p) = (1.3884489+-0.0000006)*10**-3 u.


pdgid: S017D
text:
Calculated by us from the COHEN 1987 ratio mass(n)/mass(p) = 1.001378404+-0.000000009. In u, mass(n)-mass(p) = 0.001388434+-0.000000009 u.


pdgid: S017T
text:
PATTIE 2018 uses a new technique, with a semi-toroidal magneto-gravitational asymmetric trap and a novel in situ n-detector.


pdgid: S017T
text:
ARZUMANOV 2015 is a reanalysis of their 2008 -- 2010 dataset, with improved systematic corrections of of ARZUMANOV 2000 and ARZUMANOV 2012.


pdgid: S017T
text:
STEYERL 2012 is a detailed reanalysis of neutron storage loss corrections to the raw data of MAMPE 1989, and it replaces that value.


pdgid: S017T
text:
WILSON 2021 extract the value from the flux of n escaping the moon using data from the Lunar Prospector Neutron Spectrometer.


pdgid: S017T
text:
YUE 2013 differs from NICO 2005 in that a different and better method was used to measure the neutron density in the fiducial volume. This shifted the lifetime by +1.4 seconds and reduced the previously largest source of systematic uncertainty by a factor of five.


pdgid: S017T
text:
ARZUMANOV 2012 reanalyzes its systematic corrections in ARZUMANOV 2000 and obtains this corrected value.


pdgid: S017T
text:
IGNATOVICH 1995 calls into question some of the corrections and averaging procedures used by MAMPE 1993. The response, BONDARENKO 1996, denies the validity of the criticisms.


pdgid: S017MM
text:
GREENE 1982 measures the moment to be 1.04187564+-0.00000026E-3 Bohr magnetons. The value above is obtained by multiplying this by mass(p)/mass(e) = 1836.152701+-0.000037 (the 1986 CODATA value from COHEN 1987).


pdgid: S017EDM
text:
SAHOO 2017 develops theory to calculate this limit from the measured limit by GRANER 2016 of the Hg199 atom EDM.


pdgid: S017EDM
text:
LAMOREAUX 2007 faults BAKER 2006 for not including in the estimate of systematic error an effect due to the Earth's rotation. BAKER 2007 replies (1) that the effect was included implicitly in the analysis and (2) that further analysis confirms that the BAKER 2006 limit is correct as is. See also SILENKO 2007.


pdgid: S017EDM
text:
This HARRIS 1999 result includes the result of SMITH 1990. However, the averaging of the results of these two experiments has been criticized by LAMOREAUX 2000.


pdgid: S017MCR
text:
HEACOCK 2021 extract the value from Pendelloesung interferometry to measure the neutron structure factors of silicon. This value is strongly anti-correlated with the mean-square thermal atomic displacement.


pdgid: S017MCR
text:
FILIN 2020 extract the value based on their chiral-EFT calculation of the deuteron structure radius and use as input the atomic data for the difference of the deuteron and proton charge radii.


pdgid: S017EPL
text:
KOSSERT 2003 gets alpha(n)-beta(n) =(9.8+-3.6+2.1-1.1+-2.2)x10**-4 fm**3, and uses alpha(n)+beta(n) = 15.2+-0.5E-4 fm**3 from LEVCHUK 2000. Thus the errors on alpha(n) and beta(n) are anti-correlated.


pdgid: S017EPL
text:
LUNDIN 2003 measures alpha(N)-beta(N) = 6.4+-2.4E-4 fm**3 and uses accurate values for alpha(p) and alpha(p) and a precise sum-rule result for alpha(n)+beta(n). The second error is a model uncertainty, and errors on alpha(n) and beta(n) are anticorrelated. The data from this paper aer included in the analysis of MYERS 2014.


pdgid: S017EPL
text:
KOLB 2000 obtains this value with a lower limit of 7.6E-4 fm**3 but no upper limit from this experiment alone. Combined with results of ROSE 1990, the 1-sigma range is (7.6 -- 14.0)*10**-4 fm**3.


pdgid: S017EPL
text:
KOESTER 1995 uses natural Pb and the isotopes 208, 207, and 206. See this paper for a discussion of methods used by various groups to extract alpha(n) from data.


pdgid: S017MPL
text:
LUNDIN 2003 measures alpha(N)-beta(N) = 6.4+-2.4E-4 fm**3 and uses accurate values for alpha(p) and alpha(p) and a precise sum-rule result for alpha(n)+beta(n). The second error is a model uncertainty, and errors on alpha(n) and beta(n) are anticorrelated.


pdgid: S017MPL
text:
KOLB 2000 obtains this value with an upper limit of 7.6E-4 fm**3 but no lower limit from this experiment alone. Combined with results of ROSE 1990, the 1-sigma range is (1.2 -- 7.6)*10**-4 fm**3.


pdgid: S017NAN
text:
The AHARMIM 2017 value is an unbounded limit (it does not assume a positive lifetime). The bounded limit is 1.23E8 sec.


pdgid: S017NOS
text:
BAN 2023 determine limits on the oscillation time for the |deltam(nn')| range of 2 -- 59 peV. The quoted value is meanlife(nn')/sqrt(cos(beta)) > 1 sec. for B in 30 -- 1143 muT, for the case beta = 0.


pdgid: S017NOS
text:
ALMAZAN 2022 reports an experimental constraint on the probability for neutron conversion  into a hidden neutron, p < 3.1E-11 at 95% CL, which may be used to set a limit on the n n^' oscillation time.


pdgid: S017NOS
text:
ABEL 2021 determine several limits on the oscillation time as a function of the mirror magnetic field B^', and of the fixed angle, beta, between the applied magnetic field and B^'. The latter is assumed to be bound to Earth. Two values are quoted from two analysis methods: (i) meanlife(nn')/sqrt(cos(beta)) > 9 sec for B^' in 5 -- 25.4 muT, and (ii) for any angle beta, meanlife(nn') > 6 sec for B^' in 0.4 -- 25.7 muT. The authors also quote a limit of 352 sec for the case B^' = 0 T.


pdgid: S017NOS
text:
The B field was set to (0.09, 0.12, 0.21) G. Limits on oscillation time are valid for any mirror field B^' in (0.08 -- 0.17) G, and for aligned fields B and B^'. For larger values of B^', the limits are significantly reduced.


pdgid: S017NOS
text:
Losses of neutrons due to oscillations to mirror neutrons would be maximal when the magnetic fields B and B^' in the two worlds were equal. Hence the scan over B by ALTAREV 2009A: the limit applies for any B^' over the given range. At B^' = 0, the limit is 141 s (95% CL).


pdgid: S017R3
text:
BALES 2016 gets a branching fraction of 5.82+-0.23+-0.62E-3 for a photon energy range 0.4 to 14.0 keV, and with a different detector array, 3.35+-0.05+-0.15E-3 for 14.1 to 782 keV. Our result above is the sum; the error on the sum is completely dominated by the error on the lower range.


pdgid: S017R2
text:
CZARNECKI 2018 limit from an analysis of experimental discrepancies on the neutron lifetime and axial coupling applies as well to other possible exotic neutron decays.


pdgid: S017R2
text:
GREEN 1990 infers that tau(hydrogen-atom nubar_e) > 3E4 s by comparing neutron lifetime measurements made in storage experiments with those made in beta-decay experiments. However, the result depends sensitively on the lifetime measurements, and does not of course take into account more recent measurements of same.


pdgid: S017R1
text:
NORMAN 1996 gets this limit by attributing SAGE and GALLEX counting rates to the charge-nonconserving transition ^71Ga --> ^71Ge+neutrals rather than to solar-neutrino reactions.


pdgid: S017R00
text:
KLOPF 2019 value is for baryon number violating decay of neutron to electrons plus an invisible state, chi. The limit is valid for KE(e+ e-) range between 32 keV and 664 keV, strengthening to few x E-4 above approximately 100 keV.


pdgid: S017R00
text:
SUN 2018 value is for baryon number violating decay of neutron to electrons plus an invisible state, chi. The limit is valid for 100 keV < KE(e+ e-) < 644 keV. Assuming this decay chi e e is the only allowed chi decay channel, a 0.01 BR is ruled out for 100 keV < E(e+ e-) < 644 keV at over 5sigma.


pdgid: S017R01
text:
LE-JOUBIOUX 2024 search for the baryon number violating decay of n to invisible dark matter candidate, using the He6 --> He4 + n + chi reaction, looking for a coincident neutron signal.


pdgid: S017R01
text:
TANG 2018 search for the baryon number violating decay of n to gamma plus an invisible dark matter candidate. They exclude the presence of a monoenergetic gamma ray in the E(gamma) range 782 -- 1664 keV with branching ratio ~1% at 97% CL or greater.


pdgid: S017AV
text:
WIETFELDT 2024 updates HASSAN 2021, see footnote to HASSAN 2021. The value is extracted from the angular correlation coefficient.


pdgid: S017AV
text:
BECK 2020 calculates this value from the measurement of the beta-decay e-nubar_{{e}} angular correlation coefficient a.


pdgid: S017AV
text:
BROWN 2018 gets A = -0.12054+-0.00044+-0.00068 and lambda = -1.2783+-0.0022. We quote the combined values that include the earlier UCNA measurements (MENDENHALL 2013).


pdgid: S017AV
text:
MOSTOVOI 2001 measures the two P-odd correlations A and B, or rather SA and SB, where S is the n polarization, in free neutron decay.


pdgid: S017AV
text:
HASSAN 2021 include earlier data of DARIUS 2017. The value is extracted from the angular correlation coefficient a.


pdgid: S017AV
text:
SAUL 2020 quote this value of lambda under the SM assumption of the Fierz term b = 0. In a combined fit authors extract a value of lambda = -1.2792+-0.0060.


pdgid: S017AV
text:
DARIUS 2017 calculates this value from the measurement of the a parameter (see  below). Data is included in HASSAN 2021.


pdgid: S017AV
text:
MENDENHALL 2013 gets A = -0.11954+-0.00055+-0.00098 and lambda = -1.2756+-0.0030. We quote the nearly identical values that include the earlier UCNA measurement (PLASTER 2012), with a correction to that result.


pdgid: S017AV
text:
This PLASTER 2012 value is identical with that given in LIU 2010, but the experiment is now described in detail.


pdgid: S017BA
text:
MAERKISCH 2019 further derive a value for the CKM-element |V_{{ud}}| = 0.97351+-0.00060, using meanlife(n) = 879.7(8) sec and the relation from CZARNECKI 2018.


pdgid: S017BA
text:
This MUND 2013 value includes earlier PERKEO II measurements (ABELE 2002 and ABELE 1997D), with a correction to those results.


pdgid: S017BA
text:
Under the SM assumption that the Fierz term b = 0, SAUL 2020 obtain the quoted asymmetry parameter A and lambda = -1.27607+-0.00068. In a combined fit authors extract the values A = -0.1209+-0.0015, lambda = -1.2792+-0.0060, and b = 0.017+-0.021.


pdgid: S017BA
text:
These results are not corrected for radiative effects and weak magnetism, but the corrections are small compared to the errors.


pdgid: S017BNC
text:
WIETFELDT 2024 updates HASSAN 2021. Includes radiative and recoil corrections to first order, and is averaged over the full Fermi neutron beta spectrum. Supersedes HASSAN 2021.


pdgid: S017BNC
text:
HASSAN 2021 includes the data of DARIUS 2017. Uses the asymmetry in time-of-flight between the beta electron and recoil proton in delayed coincidence. Supersedes DARIUS 2017.


pdgid: S017BNC
text:
DARIUS 2017 exploits a "wishbone" correlation, where the p time of flight is correlated  with the momentum of the electron in delayed coincidence. Data is included in HASSAN 2021.


pdgid: S017D1
text:
EROZOLIMSKII 1978 says asymmetric proton losses and nonuniform beam polarization may give a systematic error up to 30E-4, thus increasing the EROZOLIMSKII 1974 error to 50E-4. STEINBERG 1974 and STEINBERG 1976 estimate these systematic errors to be insignificant in their experiment.


pdgid: S017TCC
text:
KOZELA 2012 also measures the polarization of the electron along the direction of the neutron spin. This is nonzero in the Standard Model; the correlation coefficient is N = +0.067+-0.011+-0.004.


pdgid: S017A00
text:
In a combined fit SAUL 2020 extract this best fit value of the Fierz interference term b and the values A = -0.1209+-0.0015 and lambda = -1.2792+-0.0060. For b it translates into a 90% CL region of -0.018 <= b <= 0.052 as a function of A.


pdgid: B014RE
text:
BATINIC 2010 finds evidence for a second null state with all parameters except for the phase of the pole residue very similar to the parameters we give here.


pdgid: B033RE
text:
See HOEHLER 1993 for a detailed discussion of the evidence for and the pole parameters of N and Delta resonances as determined from Argand diagrams of pi N elastic partial-wave amplitudes and from plots of the speeds with which the amplitudes traverse the diagrams.


pdgid: B033IM+
text:
The second (lower) value of HANSTEIN 1996 here goes with the second (higher) value of the real part in the preceding data block.


pdgid: B033EMR
text:
This ARNDT 1997 value is very sensitive to the database being fitted. The result is from a fit to the full pion photoproduction database, apart from the BLANPIED 1997 cross-section measurements.


pdgid: S018M
text:
We assume CPT invariance: this is the Lambdabar mass as measured by HARTOUNI 1994. See below for the fractional mass difference, testing CPT.


pdgid: S018M
text:
The SCHMIDT 1965 masses have been reevaluated using our April 1973 proton and K+- and pi+- masses. P. Schmidt, private communication (1974).


pdgid: S018M
text:
The mass has been raised 35 keV to take into account a 46 keV increase in the proton mass and an 11 keV decrease in the pi+- mass (note added Reviews of Modern Physics 39 1 (1967)).


pdgid: S018R8
text:
This ABLIKIM 2022AJ value is a factor of 2.1 smaller and differs by 5.6sigma from the  previous LARSON 1993 value.


pdgid: S018R5
text:
Changed by us from G(Lambda --> p e- nubar_e)/G(Lambda --> N pi) assuming the authors used Gamma(Lambda --> p pi-)/Gamma(total) = 2/3.


pdgid: S018R5
text:
Changed by us from G(Lambda --> p e- nubar_e)/G(Lambda --> N pi) because Gamma(p e- nu)/Gamma(p pi-) is the directly measured quantity.


pdgid: S018R00
text:
ABLIKIM 2021AG use Lambdabar --> pbar pi+ decay mode as the double tag identifier and thus as indirect normalization.


pdgid: S018A05
text:
ABLIKIM 2023BM quote the oscillation rate limit P(Lambda) < 4.4E-6 and calculate the oscillation parameter deltam(Lambdabar Lambda) given here.


pdgid: S018A-
text:
This is a new analysis based on existing kaon photoproduction data of the CLAS collaboration and using spin algebra constraints.


pdgid: S018AL
text:
LI 2023C quote the average Lambda-hyperon asymmetry A(CP)**alpha from 264k Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+ decays and 105k Lambda_c()+ --> Sigma0 pi+ decays, under the assumption of no CP violation in the SM for Lambda_c()+, i.e. alpha(Lambda_{{c}}()+) = -alpha(Lambdabar_{{c}}()-).


pdgid: S018AL
text:
CHAUVAT 1985 actually gives alpha(+)(Lambdabar)/alpha(-)(Lambda) = -1.04+-0.29. Assumes polarization is same in pbar p --> Lambdabar X and p p --> Lambda X. Tests of this assumption, based on C-invariance and fragmentation, are satisfied by the data.


pdgid: S018A03
text:
Relative phase between GE and GM, determined using the latest BES-III value on the asymmetry parameter alpha = 0.750+-0.010.


pdgid: S018AV
text:
The tabulated result assumes the weak-magnetism coupling w == electron gfactor(w)(0)/electron gfactor(v)(0) to be 0.97, as given by the CVC hypothesis and as assumed by the other listed measurements. However, DWORKIN 1990 measures w to be 0.15+-0.30, and then electron gfactor(A)/electron gfactor(V) = -0.731+-0.016.


pdgid: B037M2
text:
The KIMURA 2000 values are from fits A and B from a coupled-channel potential model using low-energy Kbar N and Sigma pi data, kaonic-hydrogen x-ray measurements, and our Lambda(1405) mass and width. The results bear mainly on the nature of the Lambda(1405): three-quark state or Kbar N bound state.


pdgid: B037M2
text:
The MARTIN 1981 fit includes the K+- p forward scattering amplitudes and the dispersion relations they must satisfy.


pdgid: B038R9
text:
The central bin (1514-1524 MeV) gives 0.74+-0.10; other bins are lower by 2-to-5 standard deviations.


pdgid: B038R5
text:
Calculated from G(Lambda(1520) --> Lambda gamma)/G(total), assuming SU(3). Needed to constrain the sum of all the branching ratios to be unity.


pdgid: B040M
text:
MARTIN 1977 obtains identical resonance parameters from a T-matrix pole and from a Breit-Wigner fit.


pdgid: B055M
text:
The two MARTIN 1977 values are from a T-matrix pole and from a Breit-Wigner fit. Another D(03) Lambda at 1966 MeV is also suggested by MARTIN 1977, but is very uncertain.


pdgid: B039R5
text:
There is a suggestion of a bump, enough to be consistent with what is expected from Sigma(1385) --> Sigma pi decay.


pdgid: B056RE
text:
The preferred solution A in KAMANO 2015 reports two poles. This entry is from the preferred solution A.


pdgid: B056R4
text:
The CAMERON 1978 upper limit on G-wave decay is 0.03. The published sign has been changed to be in accord with the baryon-first convention.


pdgid: B041M
text:
The NAKKASYAN 1975 values are from the two best solutions found. Each has the Lambda(2100) and one additional resonance (P(3) or F(5)).


pdgid: B041R7
text:
The published sign has been changed to be in accord with the baryon-first convention. The upper limit on the G(3) wave is 0.03.


pdgid: B035R4
text:
The CAMERON 1978 upper limit on F-wave decay is 0.03. The sign here has been changed to be in accord with the baryon-first convention.


pdgid: B035R5
text:
The published sign has been changed to be in accord with the baryon-first convention. The CAMERON 1978B upper limits on the P(3) and F(3) waves are each 0.03.


pdgid: S019M
text:
BOHM 1972 is updated with our 1973 K-, pi-, and pi0 masses (Reviews of Modern Physics 45 S1 (1973)).


pdgid: S019M
text:
These masses have been raised 30 keV to take into account a 46 keV increase in the proton mass and a 21 keV decrease in the pi0 mass (note added 1967 edition, Reviews of Modern Physics 39 1 (1967)).


pdgid: S019T
text:
This is a measurement of the Sigmabar- lifetime. Here we assume CPT invariance; see below for the fractional Sigma+-Sigmabar- lifetime difference obtained by BARBOSA 2000.


pdgid: S019T
text:
We have increased the CHANG 1966 error of 0.018; see our 1970 edition, Reviews of Modern Physics 42 87 (1970).


pdgid: S019MM
text:
We assume CPT invariance: this is (minus) the Sigmabar- magnetic moment as measured by MORELOS 1993. See below for the moment difference testing CPT.


pdgid: S019MM
text:
ANKENBRANDT 1983 gives the value 2.38+-0.02moment(N). MORELOS 1993 uses the same hyperon magnet and channel and claims to determine the field integral better, leading to the revised value given here.


pdgid: S019MMD
text:
This is our calculation from the MORELOS 1993 measurements of the Sigma+ and Sigmabar- magnetic moments given above. The statistical error on moment(Sigmabar-) dominates the error here.


pdgid: S019R00
text:
This value is quoted by ABLIKIM 2023Y for the simultaneous fit to Sigma --> p gamma and   Sigmabar --> pbar gamma assuming no CP violation. Individual values for the branching fractions are given as 1.005+-0.032E-3 and  0.993+-0.030E-3, respectively.


pdgid: S019R8
text:
ANG 1969B found three p e+ e- events in agreement with gamma --> e+ e- conversion from Sigma+ --> p gamma. The limit given here is for neutral currents.


pdgid: S019R12
text:
The masses of the three dimuons of PARK 2005 are within 1 MeV of one another, perhaps indicating the existence of a new state P0 with mass 214.3+-0.5 MeV. In that case, the decay is Sigma+ --> p P0, P0 --> mu+ mu-, with a branching fraction of 3.1+2.4-1.9+-1.5E-8.


pdgid: S019R03
text:
FCNC search for invisible massless particles (dark photons) using missing energy in Sigma hyperon decays to a proton. For a QCD axion scenario, a competitive lower limit can be derived for the axial-vector part of the s-d flavor-violating axion-fermion effective decay constant F_{{sd}}^A > 2.8E7 GeV.


pdgid: S019A0
text:
ABLIKIM 2020X uses production through e+ e --> J/psi --> Sigma+ Sigmabar- and e+ e --> psi(2S) --> Sigma+ Sigmabar-, with 87,815 and 5,327 events, respectively. Note that the reported values of decay parameters alpha_{{0}}() of Sigma+ and alphabar_{{0}}() of Sigmabar- are correlated.


pdgid: S019AG
text:
This value is quoted by ABLIKIM 2023Y for the simultaneous fit to Sigma --> p gamma and   Sigmabar --> pbar gamma assuming no CP violation.  Individual values are given as  -0.587+-0.082 and 0.710+-0.076,  respectively.


pdgid: S021T
text:
DEVLIN 1986 is a recalculation of the results of DYDAK 1977 removing a numerical approximation made in that work.


pdgid: S020T
text:
We have increased the CHANG 1966 error of 0.026; see our 1970 edition, Reviews of Modern Physics 42 87 (1970).


pdgid: S020R2
text:
An additional negative systematic error is included for internal radiative corrections and latest form factors; see BOURQUIN 1983C.


pdgid: S020AV2
text:
The sign is, with our conventions, unambiguously positive. The value assumes, as usual, that g(2) = 0. If g(2) is included in the fit, than (with our sign convention) g(2) = -0.56+-0.37, with a corresponding reduction of electron gfactor(A)/electron gfactor(V) to +0.20+-0.08.


pdgid: S020AV2
text:
TANENBAUM 1974 gives 0.435+-0.035, assuming no q**2 dependence in g(A) and electron gfactor(V). The listed result allows q**2 dependence, and is taken from HSUEH 1988.


pdgid: B043R6
text:
KELLER 2012 gives Gamma(Sigma+ gamma)/Gamma(Sigma+ pi0) = (11.95+-2.21+0.53-1.21)%, using 1/2 our total Sigma(1385) --> Sigma pi fraction for Sigma+ pi0. We divide the KELLER 2012 value by two.


pdgid: B000M
text:
The main effect observed by LITCHFIELD 1974 is in the Lambda pi final state; the Kbar N and Sigma pi couplings are estimated from a multichannel fit including total-cross-section data of LI 1973.


pdgid: B000R1
text:
From the preferred solution A in KAMANO 2015. The main effect observed by LITCHFIELD 1974 is in the Lambda pi final state; the Kbar N and Sigma pi couplings are estimated from a multichannel fit including total-cross-section data of LI 1973.


pdgid: B057RE
text:
From the preferred solution A in KAMANO 2015. Solution B reports two poles at M = 1551+2-9 MeV and 1940+2-2 MeV.


pdgid: B057IM
text:
From the preferred solution A in KAMANO 2015. Solution B Reports two poles with Gamma = 376+12-2 and 172+4-4 MeV.


pdgid: B057M
text:
An S-wave Breit-Wigner fit to the threshold cross section with no background and errors statistical only.


pdgid: B045R9
text:
For about 3/4 of this, the Sigma pi system has I = 0 and is almost entirely Lambda(1520). For the rest, the Sigma pi has I = 1, which is about what is expected from the known Sigma(1775) --> Sigma(1385) pi rate, as seen in Lambda pi pi.


pdgid: B045R3
text:
This rate combines P-wave- and F-wave decays. The CAMERON 1977 results for the separate P-wave- and F-wave decays are -0.303+-0.010 and -0.037+-0.014. The published signs have been changed here to be in accord with the baryon-first convention.


pdgid: B046W
text:
The two entries for CORDEN 1977C are from two different acceptable solutions. Preferred solution 3; see CORDEN 1976 for other possibilities.


pdgid: S023T
text:
The ZECH 1977 result is meanlife(Xi0) = [2.77-(meanlife(Lambda)-2.69)]*10**-10 s, in which we use meanlife(Lambda) = 2.63E-10 s.


pdgid: S023R8
text:
LAI 2004A used our 2002 value of 99.5% for the Xi0 --> Lambda pi0 branching fraction to get Gamma(Xi0 --> Lambda gamma)/Gamma(total)= 1.16+-0.05+-0.06E-3. We adjust slightly to go back to what was directly measured.


pdgid: S023R8
text:
FANTI 2000 used our 1998 value of 99.5% for the Xi0 --> Lambda pi0 branching fraction to get Gamma(Xi0 --> Lambda gamma)/Gamma(total)= 1.90+-0.34+-0.19E-3. We adjust slightly to go back to what was directly measured.


pdgid: S023R9
text:
FANTI 2000 used our 1998 value of 99.5% for the Xi0 --> Lambda pi0 branching fraction to get Gamma(Xi0 --> Sigma0 gamma)/Gamma(total)= 3.14+-0.76+-0.32E-3. We adjust slightly to go back to what was directly measured.


pdgid: S023R13
text:
BATLEY 2013 used Xi0 --> Sigma+ e- nubar_e decay as a normalization mode and its branching fraction value of 2.51+-0.03+-0.09E-4 from BATLEY 2007.


pdgid: S023F
text:
The errors have been multiplied by 1.2 due to approximations used for the Xi polarization; see DAUBER 1969 for a discussion.


pdgid: S023LG
text:
BATLEY 2010B also measured the Xibar^0() --> Lambdabar gamma asymmetry to be -0.798+-0.064 (no systematic error given) with 4769 events.


pdgid: S023LEE
text:
This BATLEY 2007C result is consistent with the asymmetry alpha for Xi0 --> Lambda gamma, as expected if the mechanism is internal bremsstrahlung.


pdgid: S023AG
text:
BATLEY 2010B also measured the Xibar^0() --> Sigmabar0 gamma asymmetry to be -0.786+-0.104 (no systematic error given) with 1404 events.


pdgid: S023AH
text:
ALAVI-HARATI 2001I assumes here that the second-class current is zero and that the weak-magnetism term takes its exact SU(3) value.


pdgid: S022R9
text:
DUBBS 1994 also finds weak evidence that the asymmetry parameter alpha_{{gamma}} is positive (alpha_{{gamma}} = 1.0+-1.3).


pdgid: S022R7
text:
See the separate BOURQUIN 1983 values for G(Xi- --> Lambda e- nubar_e)/G(Xi- --> Lambda pi-) and [G(Xi- --> Sigma0 e- nubar_e)G(Xi- --> Lambda pi-)] above.


pdgid: S022R7
text:
DUCLOS 1971 cannot distinguish Sigma0's from Lambda's. The Cabibbo theory predicts the Sigma0 rate is about a factor 6 smaller than the Lambda rate.


pdgid: S022R14
text:
This LITTENBERG 1992B limit and the identical YEH 1974 limits for the preceding three modes all result from nonobservance of any 3-prong decays of the Xi-. One could as well apply the limit to the sum of the four modes.


pdgid: S022AA
text:
This LUK 2000 value is for alpha(Xibar+) alpha(+)(Lambdabar). We assume CP conservation here by including it in the average for alpha(Xi-) alpha(-)(Lambda). But see the second data block below for the CP test.


pdgid: S022F
text:
From this result and alpha(Xi), HUANG 2004 gets beta(Xi) = -0.037+-0.011+-0.010 and gamma(Xi) = 0.888+-0.0004+-0.006. And the strong p-s phase difference for Lambda pi- scattering is (4.6+-1.4+-1.2)degree.


pdgid: S022F
text:
From this result and alpha(Xi), CHAKRAVORTY 2003 obtains beta(Xi) = -0.025+-0.042+-0.006 and gamma(Xi) = 0.889+-0.001+-0.007. And the strong p-s phase difference for Lambda pi- scattering is (3.17+-5.28+-0.73)degree.


pdgid: S022AV
text:
BOURQUIN 1983 assumes that g(2) = 0. Also, the sign has been changed to agree with our conventions, given in the ``Note on Baryon Decay Parameters'' in the neutron Listings.


pdgid: B050M
text:
BIAGI 1987 also sees weak signals in the in the Xi- pi+ pi- channel at 1782.6+-1.4 MeV (Gamma = 6.0+-1.5 MeV) and 1831.9+-2.8 MeV (Gamma = 9.6+-9.9 MeV).


pdgid: B050M
text:
BADIER 1972 adds all channels and divides the peak into lower and higher mass regions. The data can also be fitted with a single Breit-Wigner of mass 1800 MeV and width 150 MeV.


pdgid: B103M
text:
CHLIAPNIKOV 1979 does not uniquely identify the K+ in the (Lambdabar K+) X final state. It also reports bumps with fewer events at 2240, 2540, and 2830 MeV.


pdgid: B103M
text:
GAY 1976C sees a 4-standard deviation signal. However, HEMINGWAY 1977, with more events from the same experiment points out that the signal is greatly reduced if a cut is made on the 4-momentum u. This suggests an anomalous production mechanism if the Xi(2120) is real.


pdgid: S024M
text:
The FRY 1955 and FRY 1955B events were identified as Omega- by ALVAREZ 1973. The masses assume decay to Lambda K- at rest. For FRY 1955B, decay from an atomic orbit could Doppler shift the K- energy and the resulting Omega- mass by several MeV. This shift is negligible for FRY 1955 because the Omega decay is approximately perpendicular to its orbital velocity, as is known because the Lambda strikes the nucleus (L.Alvarez, private communication 1973). We have calculated the error assuming that the orbital n is 4 or larger.


pdgid: S024M
text:
Excluded from the average; the Omega- lifetimes measured by the experiments differ significantly from other measurements.


pdgid: S024M
text:
The EISENBERG 1954 mass was calculated for decay in flight. ALVAREZ 1973 has shown that the Omega interacted with an Ag nucleus to give K- Xi ^Ag.


pdgid: S024R8
text:
This KAMAEV 2010 value uses 76 Omega- --> Xi- pi+ pi- and 24 Omegabar+ --> Xibar+ pi- pi+ decays. The Omega- and Omegabar+ branching fractions measurements are statistically equal. The errors given combine statistical and systematic contributions. The CP branching-fraction asymmetry, (Omega--Omegabar+)/sum, is +0.12+-0.20.


pdgid: S024R6
text:
The same 4 events as in the previous mode, with the isospin factor to take into account Xi(1530)0 --> Xi0 pi0 decays included. BOURQUIN 1984 adopted a theoretical assumption that Xi(1530)0 pi- would dominate Xi- pi+ pi- decay.


pdgid: S033M
text:
AUBERT,B 2005S uses low-Q Lambda K0S K+ and Sigma0 K0S K+ decays to minimize systematic errors. The error above includes systematic as well as statistical errors. Many cross checks and adjustments to properties of the BABAR detector, as well as the large number of clean events, make this by far the best measurement of the Lambda_{{c}}()+ mass.


pdgid: S033T
text:
AAIJ 2019AG reports [Lambda_{{c}}()+ MEAN LIFE] / [D+- MEAN LIFE] = 0.1956+-0.0010+-0.0013 which we multiply by our best value D+- MEAN LIFE = 1.033+-0.005E-12 s. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S033P75
text:
Comparing with the PDG 2022 value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K0S) = 1.59+-0.07E-2, ABLIKIM 2024CQ notes the K(S)0 - K(L)0 splitting to be -0.025+-0.031 in these modes.


pdgid: S033R1
text:
This ZUPANC 2014 value is the FIRST-EVER model-independent measurement of a Lambda_{{c}}()+ branching fraction.


pdgid: S033R1
text:
See the note by P. Burchat, "Lambda_{{c}}()+ Branching Fractions," in any edition of the Review from 2002 through 2014 for how this value was obtained. It is now obsolete.


pdgid: S033P57
text:
AAIJ 2023Z uses an amplitude analysis of 400k Lambda_c --> p K- pi+ decays, the last uncertainty is due to the amplitude model.


pdgid: S033R2
text:
AITALA 2000 makes a coherent 5-dimensional amplitude analysis of 946+-38 Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+ decays.


pdgid: S033P76
text:
Comparing with the PDG 2022 value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K0S pi0) = 1.96+-0.12E-2, ABLIKIM 2024CQ notes the K(S)0 - K(L)0 splitting to be 0.015+-0.046 in these modes.


pdgid: S033P77
text:
Comparing with the PDG 2022 value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K0S pi+ pi-) = 1.60+-0.11E-2, ABLIKIM 2024CQ notes the K(S)0 - K(L)0 splitting to be -0.027+-0.048 in these modes.


pdgid: S033P78
text:
AAIJ 2024AI reports [G(Lambda_c()+ --> p eta)/G(Lambda_c()+ --> p phi)] * [B(eta --> mu+ mu-)] / [B(phi(1020) --> mu+ mu-)] = 0.032+-0.013+-0.004 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(eta --> mu+ mu-) = 5.8+-0.8E-6, B(phi(1020) --> mu+ mu-) = 2.86+-0.22E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S033P36
text:
Observed with 3.6 sigma statistical significance with 4.5 fb**-1 of e+ e- collisions between 4.600 and 4.699 GeV. The eta^' is reconstructed in the two decay modes eta^' --> pi+ pi- eta and eta^' --> pi+ pi- gamma, with signal yields 4.9+3.2-2.6 and 4.3+2.6-2.2 events, respectively.


pdgid: S033P79
text:
AAIJ 2024AI reports [G(Lambda_c()+ --> p omega(782)0)/G(Lambda_c()+ --> p phi)] * [B(omega(782) --> mu+ mu-)] / [B(phi(1020) --> mu+ mu-)] = 0.240+-0.030+-0.018 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(omega(782) --> mu+ mu-) = 7.4+-1.8E-5, B(phi(1020) --> mu+ mu-) = 2.86+-0.22E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S033P80
text:
AAIJ 2024AI reports [G(Lambda_c()+ --> p rho(770)0)/G(Lambda_c()+ --> p phi)] * [B(rho(770) --> mu+ mu-)] / [B(phi(1020) --> mu+ mu-)] = 0.229+-0.051+-0.022 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(rho(770) --> mu+ mu-) = 4.55+-0.28E-5, B(phi(1020) --> mu+ mu-) = 2.86+-0.22E-4. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S033R88
text:
CRONIN-HENNESSY 2003 finds this channel to be dominantly Lambda eta pi+ and Lambda omega pi+; see below.


pdgid: S033P15
text:
ABLIKIM 2019X report evidence for the observation of the decay Lambda_c()+ --> Sigma+ eta at 2.5sigma significance.


pdgid: S033P16
text:
ABLIKIM 2019X report evidence for the observation of the decay Lambda_c()+ --> Sigma+ eta^' at 3.2sigma significance.


pdgid: S033P64
text:
We do not include this measurement in our average because it is highly correlated to the relative branching fractions B(Lambda_c --> Sigma+ K+ K-) / B(Lambda_c --> Sigma+ pi+ pi-) and B(Lambda_c --> Sigma+ phi) / B(Lambda_c --> Sigma+ pi+ pi-) measured in the same analysis (which we do use). Although the measurements are done on the same data, ABLIKIM 2023BY do not obtain exactly B(Lambda_c --> Sigma+ phi).B(phi --> K+ K-) / B(Lambda_c --> Sigma+ pi+ pi-) + B(Lambda_c()+ --> Sigma+ K+ K- (non-phi )) / B(Lambda_c --> Sigma+ pi+ pi-) = B(Lambda_c --> Sigma+ K+ K-) / B(Lambda_c --> Sigma+ pi+ pi-).


pdgid: S033R73
text:
BERGFELD 1994 measures CS(e+ e- --> Lambda_c()+ X).B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda e+ nu_e) = (4.87+-0.28+-0.69) pb.


pdgid: S033R73
text:
To extract Gamma(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda e+ nu_e)/Gamma(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+), we use sigma(e+ e- --> Lambda_c()+ X).B(Lambda_c --> p K- pi+) = (11.2+-1.3) pb, which is the weighted average of measurements from ARGUS (ALBRECHT 1996E) and CLEO (AVERY 1991).


pdgid: S033R73
text:
ALBRECHT 1991G measures CS(e+ e- --> Lambda_c()+ X).B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda e+ nu_e) = (4.20+-1.28+-0.71) pb.


pdgid: S033P38
text:
ABLIKIM 2022BB reports B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda(1520) e+ nu_e ). B(Lambda(1520) --> p K-) = 2.3+-1.2+-0.2E-4, which is divided by the best value for B(Lambda(1520) --> p K-) assuming the isospin limit 2. B(Lambda(1520) --> p K-) = B(Lambda(1520) --> N Kbar) = 0.45+-0.01.


pdgid: S033R74
text:
BERGFELD 1994 measures CS(e+ e- --> Lambda_c()+ X).B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda mu+ nu_mu) = (4.43+-0.51+-0.64) pb.


pdgid: S033R74
text:
To extract Gamma(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda mu+ nu_mu)/Gamma(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+), we use sigma(e+ e- --> Lambda_c()+ X).B(Lambda_c --> p K- pi+) = (11.2+-1.3) pb, which is the weighted average of measurements from ARGUS (ALBRECHT 1996E) and CLEO (AVERY 1991).


pdgid: S033R74
text:
ALBRECHT 1991G measures CS(e+ e- --> Lambda_c()+ X).B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda mu+ nu_mu) = (3.91+-2.02+-0.90) pb.


pdgid: S033P00
text:
This is the ratio of the ABLIKIM 2017D Lambda mu+ nu_e branching fraction and the ABLIKIM 2015Y Lambda e+ nu_e branching fraction (see above), and so is not an independent measurement.


pdgid: S033R59
text:
This CRAWFORD 1992 value includes protons from Lambda decay. The value is model dependent, but account is taken of this in the systematic error.


pdgid: S033R61
text:
This CRAWFORD 1992 value includes neutrons from Lambda decay. The value is model dependent, but account is taken of this in the systematic error.


pdgid: S033R65
text:
AAIJ 2024AI measures B(Lambda_c()+ --> p mu+ mu- non-res)/B(Lambda_c()+ --> p phi, phi --> mu+ mu-) < 0.09 (0.10) at 90% (95%) CL corresponding to a limit of 2.9 (3.2) E-8.


pdgid: S033A
text:
AAIJ 2024AH also reports the measurements of the decay parameters beta and gamma, the phase difference Delta, the CP asymmetry R_{{beta}} and the CP average R_{{beta}}^' for Lambda_c --> Lambda pi and its charge-conjugated decay.


pdgid: S033A
text:
LI 2023C obtained the value by a fit for the product alpha x alpha(Lambda)**avg, and dividing by the value alpha(Lambda)**avg = 0.7542+-0.0026 reported in ABLIKIM 2022AG.


pdgid: S033A
text:
BISHAI 1995 actually gives alpha=-0.94+0.21-0.06+0.12-0.06, chopping the errors at the physical limit -1.0. However, for alpha~~-1.0, some experiments should get unphysical values (alpha<-1.0), and for averaging with other measurements such values (or errors that extend below -1.0) should not be chopped.


pdgid: S033ALC
text:
ABLIKIM 2023AT measures alpha of Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda mu+ nu_mu decay over eight q^2 bins from zero to the kinematic  endpoint. The value provided here is, averaged over q^2. The analysis uses form factors extracted from a simultaneous fit to electron and muon mode data.


pdgid: S033ALC
text:
HINSON 2005 measures the form-factor ratio R==f(2)/f(1) for Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda e+ nu_e events to be -0.31+-0.05+-0.04 and the pole mass to be 2.21+-0.08+-0.14 GeV/c**2, and from these calculates alpha, averaged over q**2, where <q**2> = 0.67 (GeV/c)**2.


pdgid: S033ALC
text:
ALBRECHT 1994B uses Lambda e+ and Lambda mu+ events in the mass range 1.85<M(Lambda lepton+)<2.20 GeV.


pdgid: S033ALC
text:
CRAWFORD 1995 measures the form-factor ratio R==f(2)/f(1) for Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda e+ nu_e events to be -0.25+-0.14+-0.08 and from this calculates alpha, averaged over q**2, to be the above.


pdgid: S033A11
text:
AAIJ 2024AH also reports the measurements of the decay parameters beta and gamma, the phase difference Delta, the CP asymmetry R_{{beta}} and the CP average R_{{beta}}^' for Lambda_c --> Lambda K and its charge-conjugated decay.


pdgid: S033A17
text:
AAIJ 2023Z uses an amplitude analysis of 400k Lambda_c --> p K- pi+ decays, the last uncertainty is due to the amplitude model. Sign determined per authors; see also AAIJ 2023AJ.


pdgid: S033A30
text:
ABLIKIM 2024AP report the phase shift between P- and S-wave amplitudes has two solutions, which are delta(P) - delta(S) = -1.55+-0.25+-0.05 rad and 1.59+-0.25+-0.05 rad.


pdgid: S033A01
text:
AAIJ 2018R applies phase-space-dependent weights to the Lambda_c()+ --> p pi+ pi- sample to align its kinematics with the Lambda_c()+ --> p K+ K- sample.


pdgid: B119D
text:
BLECHMAN 2003 finds that a more sophisticated treatment than a simple Breit-Wigner for the proximity of the threshold of the dominant decay, Sigma_c(2455) pi, lowers the Lambda_{{c}}(2595)+-Lambda_{{c}}()+ mass difference by 2 or 3 MeV. The analysis of AALTONEN 2011H bears this out.


pdgid: B119W
text:
AALTONEN 2011H treats the three charged modes Lambda_c(2595)+ --> Sigma_c(2455)++ pi-, Sigma_c(2455)+ pi0, Sigma_c(2455)0 pi+ separately in terms of a common coupling constant h_{{2}} and obtains h_{{2}}^2() = 0.36+-0.08. From this the width is determined.


pdgid: B178M
text:
The third AAIJ 2017S uncertainty comes from modeling the resonant shape of the nearby Lambda_{{c}}(2880)+ and the background (non-resonant) amplitudes.


pdgid: B151M
text:
The third AAIJ 2017S uncertainty comes from modeling the resonant shape of the Lambda_{{c}}(2880)+ and the background (non-resonant) amplitudes.


pdgid: B151W
text:
AAIJ 2017S reports 5.43+0.77-0.71+-0.29+0.75-0.00 MeV value where the third uncertainty comes from modeling the resonant shape of the Lambda_{{c}}(2880)+ and the background (non-resonant) amplitudes. We have combined in quadrature the systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: B104D13
text:
DIESBURG 1987 is completely incompatible with the other experiments, which is surprising since it agrees with them about mass(Sigma_{{c}}(2455)++)-mass(Lambda_{{c}}()+). We go with the majority here.


pdgid: S045M
text:
AAIJ 2014Z systematic error includes in quadrature the 0.14 MeV uncertainty from the m(Lambda_{{c}}^+) mass value.


pdgid: S045M
text:
Although COTEUS 1987 claims to agree well with BIAGI 1983 on the mass and width, there appears to be a discrepancy between the two experiments. BIAGI 1983 sees a single peak (stated significance about 6 standard deviations) in the Lambda K- pi+ pi+ mass spectrum. COTEUS 1987 sees two peaks in the same spectrum, one at the Xi_{{c}}()+ mass, the other 75 MeV lower. The latter is attributed to Xi_c()+ --> Sigma0 K- pi+ pi+ --> (Lambda gamma) K- pi+ pi+, with the gamma unseen. The combined significance of the double peak is stated to be 5.5 standard deviations. But the absence of any trace of a lower peak in BIAGI 1983 seems to us to throw into question the interpretation of the lower peak of COTEUS 1987.


pdgid: S045T
text:
AAIJ 2019AG reports [Xi_{{c}}()+ MEAN LIFE] / [D+- MEAN LIFE] = 0.4392+-0.0034+-0.0028 which we multiply by our best value D+- MEAN LIFE = 1.033+-0.005E-12 s. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S045R3
text:
LI 2019C report a significance of 6.8 sigma for the observation of this decay mode, observed in Xi_{{c}}()+ from Bbar0 --> Lambdabar_c()- Xi_c()+.


pdgid: S045R05
text:
AAIJ 2020AH extracts B(Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+) assuming production fraction ratios f(Xi_{{c}}()0)/f(Lambda_{{c}}()+) = 9.7+-0.9+-3.1E-2 (from AAIJ 2019AB plus heavy quark symmetry arguments) as well as f(Xi_{{c}}()0)/f(Xi_{{c}}()+) = 1.00+-0.01, and uses the input B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.23+-0.33E-2. Its correlation with B(Xi_c()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-), as measured in AAIJ 2020AH, is 0.414.


pdgid: S045R05
text:
LI 2019C report a significance of 4.4 sigma for the observation of this decay mode, observed in Xi_{{c}}()+ from Bbar0 --> Lambdabar_c()- Xi_c()+.


pdgid: S048T
text:
Measured in Xi_c()0 produced promptly in p p collisions, using D0 --> K+ K- pi+ pi- as  normalisation mode. AAIJ 2022Y reports this lifetime value as 148.0+-2.3+-2.2+-0.2E-15 s where the last uncertainty is due to the uncertainty on the D0 lifetime value from PDG 2020 average, meanlife(D0) = (410.1+-1.5) fs.


pdgid: S048T
text:
AAIJ 2019AG reports [Xi_{{c}}()0 MEAN LIFE] / [D+- MEAN LIFE] = 0.1485+-0.0017+-0.0016 which we multiply by our best value D+- MEAN LIFE = 1.033+-0.005E-12 s. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S048R15
text:
MCNEIL 2021 assumes an azimuthally symmetric amplitude model to recover resonant and nonresonant contributions to Xi_c()0 --> Xi()0 K+ K-.


pdgid: S048R7
text:
LI 2021C measures ratio B(Xi_c()0 --> Xi- e+ nu_e) / B(Xi_c()0 --> Xi- mu+ nu_mu) = 1.03+-0.05+-0.07.


pdgid: S048R7
text:
This ALBRECHT 1993B value is the average of the (Xi- e+ anything)/Xi- pi+ and (Xi- mu+ anything)/Xi- pi+ ratios. Here we average it with the Xi- e+ nu_e/Xi- pi+ ratio.


pdgid: S048R06
text:
AAIJ 2020AH extracts B(Xi_c()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) using two different normalization modes: Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+ and Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+. The mean value of both results, taking their correlations into account, is presented as the final result. The measurement assumes production fraction ratios f(Xi_{{c}}()0)/f(Lambda_{{c}}()+) = 9.7+-0.9+-3.1E-2 (from AAIJ 2019AB plus heavy quark symmetry arguments) as well as f(Xi_{{c}}()0)/f(Xi_{{c}}()+) = 1.00+-0.01. It further uses the inputs B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.23+-0.33E-2 and B(Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 4.5+-2.1+-0.7E-3 (from LI 2019C). Its correlation with B(Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+), as measured in AAIJ 2020AH, is 0.414.


pdgid: S048R20
text:
TANG 2023 reports fitted masses mass(Lambda_{{c}}()+) = 2286.55+-0.03 MeV and mass(Xi_{{c}}()0) = 2470.43+-0.06 MeV.


pdgid: S048A02
text:
JIA 2021 measures alpha(Xi_c()0 --> Lambda Kbar^*(892)0) alpha(Lambda --> p pi-) = 0.115+-0.164+-0.031, and uses alpha(Lambda --> p pi-) = 0.747+-0.010.


pdgid: S048A03
text:
JIA 2021 measures alpha(Xi_c()0 --> Sigma+ Kbar^*(892)-) alpha(Sigma+ --> p pi0) =  0.514+-0.295+-0.012, and uses alpha(Sigma+ --> p pi0) = -0.980+-0.017.


pdgid: S048B00
text:
Search for baryon-number violating decay B- --> Xibar_c()0 Lambdabar_c()-, which can be interpreted as a search for B- --> Xi_c()0 Lambdabar_c()- followed by Xi_{{c}}()0-Xibar_{{c}}()0 baryon-number violating oscillation, from which a bound on the oscillation period tau(mix) can be inferred, assuming no direct B- --> Xibar_c()0 Lambdabar_c()- decay.


pdgid: B149R00
text:
Assumes B(Xi_c^'+ --> Xi_c()+ gamma) = 100%, noting no strong decay of the Xi_{{c}}^' is permitted in the available phase space. YELTON 2020 measures B(Xi_c(2790)0 --> Xi_c()0 gamma)/B(Xi_c(2790)0 --> Xi_c^'+ pi- --> Xi_c()+ gamma pi-).


pdgid: B149R02
text:
Assumes B(Xi_c^'0 --> Xi_c()0 gamma) = 100%, noting no strong decay of the Xi_{{c}}^' is permitted in the available phase space. YELTON 2020 measures B(Xi_c(2790)+ --> Xi_c()+ gamma)/B(Xi_c(2790)+ --> Xi_c^'0 pi+ --> Xi_c()0 gamma pi+).


pdgid: B149R03
text:
AAIJ 2023X observes this decay mode at 3.7sigma significance from a study of the Lambda_c()+ K- system within B- --> Lambda_c()+ Lambdabar_c()- K- decays.


pdgid: B148R00
text:
Assumes B(Xi_c(2645)+ --> Xi_c()0 pi+) = 100%, which is the only strong decay of the Xi_{{c}}(2645) permitted in the available phase space. YELTON 2020 measures B(Xi_c(2815)0 --> Xi_c()0 gamma)/B(Xi_c(2815)0 --> Xi_c(2645)+ pi- --> Xi_c()0 pi+ pi-).


pdgid: B148R04
text:
Assumes B(Xi_c(2645)0 --> Xi_c()+ pi-) = 100%, which is the only strong decay of the Xi_{{c}}(2645) permitted in the available phase space. YELTON 2020 measures B(Xi_c(2815)+ --> Xi_c()+ gamma)/B(Xi_c(2815)+ --> Xi_c(2645)0 pi+ --> Xi_c()+ pi- pi+).


pdgid: B192M0
text:
AAIJ 2020X uses a prompt Lambda_c()+ K- sample, and reports 2923.04+-0.25+-0.20+-0.14 MeV where the last uncertainty is due to the Lambda_{{c}}()+ mass.


pdgid: B156A04
text:
AAIJ 2020X uses a prompt Lambda_c()+ K- sample and reports 2938.55+-0.21+-0.17+-0.14 MeV where the last uncertainty is due to the Lambda_{{c}}()+ mass. Observes that the broader resonance at 2930 MeV seen in B- --> K- Lambda_c()+ Lambdabar_c()- by LI 2018A and AUBERT 2008H resolves into two narrower peaks at approximately 2939 MeV and 2923 MeV.


pdgid: B156A06
text:
AAIJ 2020X uses a prompt Lambda_c()+ K- sample and observes that the broader resonance at 2930 MeV seen in B- --> K- Lambda_c()+ Lambdabar_c()- by LI 2018A and AUBERT 2008H resolves into two narrower peaks at approximately 2939 MeV and 2923 MeV.


pdgid: B130M0
text:
AAIJ 2020X reports 2964.88+-0.26+-0.14+-0.14 MeV where the last uncertainty is due to the Lambda_{{c}}()+ mass. Further studies are required to establish whether the narrow resonance at 2965 MeV is a different baryon from the narrow resonance at 2970 MeV seen by YELTON 2016.


pdgid: B130W0
text:
Further studies are required to establish whether the narrow resonance at 2965 MeV is a different baryon from the narrow resonance at 2970 MeV seen by YELTON 2016.


pdgid: B130R05
text:
Measurement of the ratio of Xi_c(2970)+ --> Xi_c(2645)0 pi+ versus Xi_c(2970)+ --> Xi_c^'()0 pi+. The last uncertainty is from possible isospin-symmetry-breaking effects. MOON 2021 determines   from an angular analysis of the Xi_c()+ pi+ pi- final state that the spin of the  Xi_{{c}}(2970)+ is strongly compatible with J = 1/2, assuming domination by the lowest partial  wave in Xi_c(2970)+ --> Xi_c(2645)0 pi+. When further combined with the size of this ratio,  MOON 2021 determines from heavy quark symmetry that the spin-parity of the  Xi_{{c}}(2970)+  is favored to be J**P = 1/2+, with light degrees of freedom in the 0**+** state.


pdgid: S047M
text:
AAIJ 2024C reports this measurements as 2695.28+-0.07+-0.27+-0.30 MeV. The last uncertainty is due to the uncertainty in the Omega- mass. Also reported is mass(Omega_{{c}}()0)-mass(Omega-) = 1022.83+-0.07+-0.27 MeV.


pdgid: S047M
text:
FRABETTI 1994H claims a signal of 42.5+-8.8 Sigma+ K- K- pi+ events. The background is about 24 events.


pdgid: S047M
text:
ALBRECHT 1992H claims a signal of 11.5+-4.3 Xi- K- pi+ pi+ events. The background is about 5 events.


pdgid: S047T
text:
Recent measurements by AAIJ 2018J, AAIJ 2022Y, and ABUDINEN 2023 obtain consistent results that are nearly four times larger than the average result of previous experiments, 69+-12E-15 s. We go with the more recent results, mostly obtained with much larger data samples, and also note the positive correlation between the measured value and the inverse of the estimated statistical uncertainty in lifetime measurements.


pdgid: S047T
text:
AAIJ 2022Y reports this measurement as 276.5+-13.4+-4.4+-0.7E-15 s. The last  uncertainty is due to the uncertainty on the D0 lifetime meanlife(D0) = (410.1+-1.5) fs from PDG 2020. Measured in Omega_{{c}} produced promptly in p p collisions, using D0 --> K+ K- pi+ pi- as normalisation mode.


pdgid: S047R06
text:
This submode fraction is evaluated from a background-subtracted signal in a mass plot. Result ignores interference effects and systematic uncertainties, which YELTON 2018 claim are both small.


pdgid: S047R12
text:
ACHARYA 2024A measurement performed over p_{{T}} intervals in the range 2 < p_{{T}} < 12 GeV, from which a p_{{T}}-independent branching ratio is derived from a weighted average over p_{{T}}.


pdgid: S047R08
text:
LI 2021D reports the significance of the Omega(2012) signal is 4.2 sigma including systematic uncertainties. Also measures B(Omega_c()0 --> Omega(2012)- pi+, Omega(2012)- --> ( Kbar Xi )**-)/B(Omega_c()0 --> Xi0 K- pi+) = 0.220+-0.059+-0.035.


pdgid: S047R09
text:
LI 2021D reports the significance of the Omega(2012) signal is 4.2sigma including systematic uncertainties. Also measures B(Omega_c()0 --> Omega(2012)- pi+, Omega(2012)- --> (Kbar Xi)**-)/B(Omega_c()0 --> Xi0 K- pi+) = 0.220+-0.059+-0.035.


pdgid: S047R14
text:
AAIJ 2024C reports this measurements as (15.81+-0.87+-0.44+-0.16)%. The last uncertainty is due to branching ratios of Omega- --> Lambda K- and Xi- --> Lambda pi- decays taken as external inputs, which are taken to be 67.8+-0.7% and 99.887+-0.035%, respectively.


pdgid: B173M
text:
The third uncertainty is due to the uncertainty in the Xi_{{c}}()+ mass, taken to be the PDG 2022 fit result 2467.71+-0.23 MeV.


pdgid: B173M
text:
Measured via Omega_b()- --> Omega_c^**()0 pi- --> Xi_c()+ K- pi-. The third uncertainty is due  to the uncertainty in the Xi_{{c}}()+ mass.


pdgid: B174M
text:
Measured via Omega_b()- --> Omega_c^**()0 pi- --> Xi_c()+ K- pi-. The third uncertainty is due to the uncertainty in the Xi_{{c}}()+ mass.


pdgid: B177M
text:
The third error is the uncertainty on the Xi_{{c}}()+ mass. (AAIJ 2017AH gave +0.3 MeV here, but as of 2018 it is +-0.3.)


pdgid: S065M
text:
OCHERASHVILI 2005 claims ``an excess of 5.62 events over... 1.38+-0.13 events'' for a significance of 4.8~sigma in p D+ K- events.


pdgid: S065M
text:
MATTSON 2002 claims ``an excess of 15.9 events over an expected background of 6.1+-0.5 events, a statistical significance of 6.3 sigma'' in the Lambda_c()+ K- pi+ invariant-mass spectrum. The probability that the peak is a fluctuation increases from 1.0E-6 to 1.1E-4 when the number of bins searched is considered.


pdgid: S065M
text:
Uncertainties are statistical only. Because of undetermined systematic uncertainties in the  extraction of this result it cannot be considered a mass measurement. AAIJ 2021AE performs a  combined fit to its Xi_cc()+ --> Xi_c()+ pi+ pi- data and the   Xi_cc()+ --> Lambda_c()+ K- pi+  data from AAIJ 2020AX, finding a global significance  of 2.9 sigma (4.0  sigma local).


pdgid: S065R02
text:
No significant signal is seen in the mass range 3.4 -- 3.8 GeV. AAIJ 2021AE performs a combined fit to its Xi_cc()+ --> Xi_c()+ pi+ pi- data and the Xi_cc()+ --> Lambda_c()+ K- pi+ data from AAIJ 2020AX, finding a global significance of 2.9 sigma (4.0 sigma local).


pdgid: S068M
text:
AAIJ 2020J combines mass measurements 3621.53+-0.24+-0.29 MeV from Xi_cc^++ --> Lambda_c()+ K- pi+ pi+ and 3621.95+-0.60+-0.49 MeV from Xi_cc()++ --> Xi_c()+ pi+. Supersedes AAIJ 2018BA and AAIJ 2017BC.


pdgid: S068M
text:
The third error in AAIJ 2017BC value is from the uncertainty of the Lambda_{{c}}()+ mass. The width of the signal is 6.6+-0.8 MeV, consistent with the experimental resolution.


pdgid: S068R02
text:
AAIJ 2018BA reports [G(Xi_cc()++ --> Xi_c()+ pi+, Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+)/G(Xi_cc()++ --> Lambda_c()+ K- pi+ pi+)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 3.5+-0.9+-0.3E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S068R04
text:
The photon in the Xi_c^'()+ --> Xi_c()+ gamma process is not reconstructed.  Analysis uses two disjoint subsamples triggered on and independently from the signal.


pdgid: S040M
text:
Uses Lambda_b()0 --> chi_c1 p K-, Lambda_b()0 --> chi_c2 p K-, Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi Lambda, Lambda_b()0 --> p psi(2S) K-, Lambda_b()0 --> p J/psi pi+ pi- K-, and Lambda_b()0 --> p J/psi K- decays.


pdgid: S040M
text:
Uses exclusively reconstructed final states Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()-, Lambda_c()+ D()- and Bbar0 --> D+ D_s()- decays. The uncertainty includes both statistical and systematic contributions.


pdgid: S040M
text:
ABE 1997B observed 38 events with a background of 18+-1.6 events in the mass range 5.60 -- 5.65 GeV/c**2, a significance of >3.4 standard deviations.


pdgid: S040M
text:
Uses Lambda_b()0 --> p psi(2S) K-, Lambda_b()0 --> p J/psi pi+ pi- K-, and Lambda_b()0 --> p J/psi K- decays.


pdgid: S040M
text:
ABE 1993B states that, based on the signal claimed by ALBAJAR 1991E, CDF should have found 30+-23 Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi(1S) Lambda events. Instead, CDF found not more than 2 events.


pdgid: S040M
text:
ALBAJAR 1991E claims 16+-5 events above a background of 9+-1 events, a significance of about 5 standard deviations.


pdgid: S040DM2
text:
Uses exclusively reconstructed final states Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()-, Lambda_c()+ D()- and Bbar0 --> D+ D_s()- decays.


pdgid: S040T
text:
Measured the lifetime ratio of decays Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi p K- to B0 --> J/psi pi+ K- to be 0.976+-0.012+-0.006 with meanlife(B0) = 1.519+-0.007 ps.


pdgid: S040TR
text:
Measures 1/meanlife(Lambda_{{b}}()0) - 1/meanlife(B0) and uses meanlife(B0) = 1.519+-0.007 ps to extract lifetime ratio.


pdgid: S040R3
text:
ABAZOV 2011O uses B(B0 --> J/psi K0S) x B(b --> B0) = 1.74+-0.08E-4 to obtain the result. The +-0.08E-4 uncertainty of this product is listed as the last uncertainty of the measurement, +-0.28E-5.


pdgid: S040R3
text:
ABE 1997B reports [B(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi Lambda) x B(b --> Lambda_b()0)] / [B(B0 --> J/psi K0S) x B(b --> B0)] = 0.27+-0.12+-0.05. We multiply by our best value B(B0 --> J/psi K0S) x B(b --> B0) = 1.74+-0.08E-4. Our first error is their experiment error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S040R31
text:
AAIJ 2019F uses B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2 and B(psi(2S) --> e+ e-) = 7.93+-0.17E-3 from PDG 2018 with assumption of lepton universality. AAIJ 2019F reports this result as 0.513+-0.023+-0.016+-0.011, where the last uncertainty is the contribution due to the external input of branching fractions used in the analysis.


pdgid: S040R31
text:
AAD 2015CH uses B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) = 5.961+-0.033E-2 and B(psi(2S) --> mu+ mu-)= 7.89+-0.17E-3 from PDG 2014 with assumption of lepton universality.


pdgid: S040R75
text:
AAIJ 2022R reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> p D+ pi- pi-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi+ pi- pi-)] * [B(D+ --> K- 2pi+)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 5.35+-0.21+-0.16 % which we multiply or divide by our best values B(D+ --> K- 2pi+) = 9.38+-0.16E-2, B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S040R36
text:
AAIJ 2016A reported the measurement of 3.17+-0.04+-0.07+-0.34+0.45-0.28E-4 where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic, the third is due to the branching fraction of B0 --> J/psi K^*(892)0, and the fourth is due to the knowledge of f(Lambda_{{b}})/f(d). We combined in quadrature second to fourth uncertainties to a total systematic uncertainty.


pdgid: S040P06
text:
HAYRAPETYAN 2024BA reports 3.38+-1.02+-0.61+-0.03E-2 from a measurement of [G(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi Xi- K+)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> psi(2S) Lambda)] * [B(Xi- --> Lambda pi-)] / [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] assuming B(Xi- --> Lambda pi-) = 99.887+-0.035E-2,B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.68+-0.30E-2, which we rescale to our best values B(Xi- --> Lambda pi-) = 99.887+-0.035E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.69+-0.34E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S040R66
text:
AAIJ 2020AK reported the measurement of 0.333+-0.050+-0.019+-0.032, where the last uncertainty is due uncertainties of the used branching fractions of J/psi --> p pbar and eta_c --> p pbar decays. We combined in quadrature the systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: S040R37
text:
AAIJ 2016 total systematic includes the uncertainties on f(P_{{c}}()+) and B(Lambda_b --> p J/psi K-).


pdgid: S040R44
text:
AAIJ 2017AM reports 0.242+-0.014+-0.016 from a measurement of [G(Lambda_b()0 --> chi_c1(1P) p K-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> p J/psi K-)] * [B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 33.9+-1.2E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c1(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 34.3+-1.3E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S040R45
text:
AAIJ 2017AM reports 0.248+-0.02+-0.017 from a measurement of [G(Lambda_b()0 --> chi_c2(1P) p K-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> p J/psi K-)] * [B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S))] assuming B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 19.2+-0.7E-2, which we rescale to our best value B(chi_c2(1P) --> gamma J/psi(1S)) = 19.5+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S040R71
text:
The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic and the third is related to the  uncertainties in the branching fractions of the chi_cJ --> J/psi gamma decays.


pdgid: S040R72
text:
Evidence for the Lambda_b()0 --> chi_c2 p pi- decay is obtained with a significance of 3.5  standard deviations. The first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic and the third  is related to the uncertainties in the branching fractions of the chi_cJ --> J/psi gamma  decays.


pdgid: S040R39
text:
AAIJ 2016Y reports a measurement of 0.2070+-0.0076+-0.0046+-0.0037 where the third uncertainty is due to the knowledge of J/psi and psi(2S) branching fractions. We have combined both systematic uncertainties in quadrature.


pdgid: S040R58
text:
AAIJ 2019AN reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> chi_c1(3872) p K-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> p psi(2S) K-)] * [B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S))] / [B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-)] = 5.4+-1.1+-0.2E-2 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(chi_c1(3872) --> pi+ pi- J/psi(1S)) = 4.3+-1.4E-2, B(psi(2S) --> J/psi(1S) pi+ pi-) = 34.69+-0.34E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S040R11
text:
AAIJ 2014I reports 4.30+-0.03+0.12-0.11+-0.26+-0.21E-3 from a measurement of [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)/G(total)] * [B(B0 --> D- pi+)] assuming B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.68+-0.13E-3, which we rescale to our best value B(B0 --> D- pi+) = 2.51+-0.08E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Uses information on f(baryon)/f_{{d}} from measurement in semileptonic decays by the same authors.


pdgid: S040R11
text:
The result is obtained from (f(baryon)/f(d)) (B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)/B(Bbar^0() --> D+ pi-)) = 0.82+-0.08+-0.11+-0.22, assuming f(baryon)/f(d) = 0.25+-0.04 and B(Bbar^0() --> D+ pi-) = 2.68+-0.13E-3.


pdgid: S040R21
text:
AAIJ 2014H reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> p D0 pi-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 8.06+-0.23+-0.35E-2 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.945+-0.030E-2, B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S040R24
text:
Uses B(Bbar0 --> D+ D_s()-) = 7.2+-0.8E-3 and their measured B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-))/B(Bbar0 --> D+ pi-) values.


pdgid: S040R79
text:
AAIJ 2024X reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ Dbar0 K-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()-)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] / [B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+)] = 0.1400+0.0026-0.0025+0.0012-0.0013 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.945+-0.030E-2, B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.45+-0.08E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S040R80
text:
AAIJ 2024X reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ Dbar^*()0 K-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()-)] * [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] / [B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+)] = 0.432+0.013-0.012+-0.013 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.945+-0.030E-2, B(D_s()+ --> K+ K- pi+) = 5.45+-0.08E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S040R4
text:
AALTONEN 2012A reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi+ pi- pi-)/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] = 3.04+-0.33+0.70-0.55 which we multiply by our best value B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 4.9+-0.4E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S040R82
text:
AAIJ 2024Y uses Sigma_c(2455)++ --> Lambda_c()+ pi+, D- --> K+ pi- pi- and Dbar0 --> K+ pi-, analyzing an integrated luminosity of 6 fb**-1.


pdgid: S040R83
text:
AAIJ 2024Y uses Sigma_c(2455)++ --> Lambda_c()+ pi+ and D- --> K+ pi- pi-, analyzing an integrated luminosity of 6 fb**-1.


pdgid: S040R84
text:
AAIJ 2024Y uses Sigma_c(2455)++ --> Lambda_c()+ pi+, Sigma_c(2520)++ --> Lambda_c()+ pi+, and D- --> K+ pi- pi-, analyzing an integrated luminosity of 6 fb**-1.


pdgid: S040R85
text:
AAIJ 2024Y uses Sigma_c(2455)++ --> Lambda_c()+ pi+, Sigma_c(2520)++ --> Lambda_c()+ pi+, and D- --> K+ pi- pi- analyzing an integrated luminosity of 6 fb**-1.


pdgid: S040R68
text:
AAIJ 2021B systematic uncertainty includes the contribution from the D_s()- --> K+ K- pi-  branching fraction.


pdgid: S040R6
text:
BARATE 1998D reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ lepton- nubar_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon)] = 0.0086+-0.0007+-0.0014 which we divide by our best value B(bbar --> b-baryon) = 8.4+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Measured using Lambda_c lepton- and Lambda lepton+ lepton-.


pdgid: S040R6
text:
ABREU 1995S reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ lepton- nubar_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon)] = 0.0118+-0.0026+0.0031-0.0021 which we divide by our best value B(bbar --> b-baryon) = 8.4+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S040R6
text:
BUSKULIC 1995L reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ lepton- nubar_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon)] = 0.00755+-0.0014+-0.0012 which we divide by our best value B(bbar --> b-baryon) = 8.4+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S040R6
text:
BUSKULIC 1992E reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ lepton- nubar_lepton anything)/G(total)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon)] = 0.015+-0.0035+-0.0045 which we divide by our best value B(bbar --> b-baryon) = 8.4+-1.1E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. Superseded by BUSKULIC 1995L.


pdgid: S040R15
text:
Derived from a combined likelihood and event rate fit to the distribution of the Isgur-Wise variable and using HQET. The slope of the form factor is measured to be rho^2() = 2.03+-0.46+0.72-1.00.


pdgid: S040R16
text:
Derived from the fraction of Gamma(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ lepton- nubar_lepton) / ( Gamma(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ lepton- nubar_lepton) + Gamma(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi+ pi- lepton- nubar_lepton) ) = 0.47+0.10-0.08+0.07-0.06.


pdgid: S040R01
text:
AALTONEN 2009E assumes isospin conservation for Lambda_c(2595) --> Lambda_c pi+ pi+ and  Lambda_c(2595) --> Lambda_c pi0 pi0. Significant isospin violation from thresholds in Lambda_c(2595) --> Sigma_c(2455) pi --> Lambda_c pi pi may alter the recovered ratio.


pdgid: S040R9
text:
AALTONEN 2009C reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> p pi-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K+ pi-)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon)] / [B(bbar --> B0)] = 0.042+-0.007+-0.006 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.00+-0.04E-5, B(bbar --> b-baryon) = 8.4+-1.1E-2, B(bbar --> B0) = 40.8+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S040R10
text:
AALTONEN 2009C reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> p K-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K+ pi-)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon)] / [B(bbar --> B0)] = 0.066+-0.009+-0.008 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B0 --> K+ pi-) = 2.00+-0.04E-5, B(bbar --> b-baryon) = 8.4+-1.1E-2, B(bbar --> B0) = 40.8+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S040R77
text:
AAIJ 2023K reports this measurement as 2.56+-0.10+-0.05+-0.14E-3 where the last uncertainty is due to the branching fractions B(D_s()- --> K- K+ pi-) and B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) uncertainties.


pdgid: S040R34
text:
The ratio of B(Lambda_b()0 --> p mu- nubar_mu) to B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ mu- nubar_mu) is measured within a restricted q**2 region. Combined with theoretical calculations of the form factors and the previously measured value of |V_(cb)|, the first |V_(ub)| = 3.27+-0.15+-0.16+-0.06E-3 measurement from the Lambda_{{b}} decay is obtained, consistent with the exclusively measured world averages.


pdgid: S040R35
text:
This measurement is a ratio of Gamma(Lambda_b()0 --> p mu- nubar_mu)[q**2 >  15 GeV/c**2] to Gamma(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ mu- nubar_mu)[q**2 >  7 GeV/c**2] within a restricted q**2 region. Combined with theoretical calculations of the form  factors and the previously measured value of |V_(cb)|, the first |V_(ub)| =  3.27+-0.15+-0.16+-0.06E-3 measurement from the Lambda_{{b}} decay is obtained, consistent with  the exclusively measured world averages.


pdgid: S040R19
text:
Uses B(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi Lambda) = 6.2+-1.4E-4. This measurement comes from the sum of the differential rates in q**2 regions excluding those corresponding to J/psi and psi(2S) ([8.68,10.09] and [12.86, 14.18] GeV**2/c**4).


pdgid: S040R62
text:
The first uncertainty is the statistical uncertainty and the second is the combination of all systematic uncertainties including those related to the normalization of Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi p K-.


pdgid: S040R32
text:
AAIJ 2015AH reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda eta)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> eta^' K0)] = 0.142+0.11-0.08 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> eta^' K0) = 6.6+-0.4E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value. The single uncertainty quoted with the original measurement combines in quadrature statistical and systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: S040R33
text:
AAIJ 2015AH reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda eta^'(958))/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> eta^' K0)] < 0.047 which we multiply by our best value B(B0 --> eta^' K0) = 6.6E-5.


pdgid: S040R41
text:
AAIJ 2016W reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda pi+ pi-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+)] = 7.3+-1.9+-2.2E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+) = 1.31+-0.05E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S040R42
text:
AAIJ 2016W reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda K+ pi-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+)] = 8.9+-1.2+-1.3E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+) = 1.31+-0.05E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S040R43
text:
AAIJ 2016W reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda K+ K-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+)] = 25.3+-1.9+-1.9E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> Lambda pi+) = 1.31+-0.05E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S040R86
text:
AAIJ 2024R reports 1.24+-0.15+-0.10+-0.28+-0.11E-4 from a measurement of [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda D+ D-)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> D- D+ K0)] assuming B(B0 --> D- D+ K0) = 7.5+-1.7E-4. The first error is statistical, the second experimental systematic, the third due to the B0 branching fraction, and the fourth due to the cross-section ratio of Lambda_{{b}}()0 to B0 of 0.541+-0.048.


pdgid: S040R00
text:
AAIJ 2016J reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda phi)/G(total)] / [B(B0 --> K0 phi)] * [B(bbar --> b-baryon)] / [B(bbar --> B0)] = 0.275+-0.055+-0.020 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(B0 --> K0 phi) = 7.3+-0.7E-6, B(bbar --> b-baryon) = 8.4+-1.1E-2, B(bbar --> B0) = 40.8+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S040R51
text:
AAIJ 2018Q reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> p pi- pi+ pi-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 6.85+-0.19+-0.08+-0.32E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S040R52
text:
AAIJ 2018Q reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> p K- K+ pi-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 1.32+-0.09+-0.09+-0.10E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S040R53
text:
AAIJ 2018Q reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> p K- pi+ pi-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 16.4+-0.3+-0.2+-0.7E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S040R54
text:
AAIJ 2018Q reports [G(Lambda_b()0 --> p K- K+ K-)/G(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] = 4.11+-0.12+-0.06+-0.19E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.35+-0.25E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S040A40
text:
Uses B( Lambda_b --> J/psi p K- ) = 3.2+-0.6E-4. The last uncertainty is due to uncertainties of B(Lambda_b()0 --> p K- J/psi) and B(J/psi --> mu+ mu-) values.


pdgid: S040A38
text:
A(CP) is measured from (B(Lambda_b()0 --> [ K+ pi- ]_D p K-) -  B(Lambdabar_b()0 --> [ K- pi+ ]_D pbar K+))/ (B(Lambda_b()0 --> [ K+ pi- ]_D p K-) +  B(Lambdabar_b()0 --> [ K- pi+ ]_D pbar K+)) in the full phase space.


pdgid: S040A01
text:
Extracted using a Bayesian analysis. The most probable value is given as -0.022, with a 68% credibility interval [-0.048, 0.005]. Transverse polarizations of Lambda_{{b}}()0 of -0.004 (68% credibility interval [-0.064, 0.051]), 0.001 (68% credibility interval [-0.035, 0.045]), and 0.032 (68% credibility interval [-0.011, 0.065]) are also reported at 7 TeV, 8 TeV and 13 TeV, respectively. Note that both statistical and systematic uncertainties are included.


pdgid: S040A01
text:
An angular analysis of Lambda_b --> J/psi Lambda decay is performed. Note that the sign of alpha in CMS definition is the opposite to that used by AAIJ 2013AG and AAD 2014L. Lambda_{{b}} transverse production polarization of 0.00+-0.06+-0.06 is also reported, as well as squares of the helicity amplitudes.


pdgid: S040A01
text:
An angular analysis of Lambda_b --> J/psi Lambda decay is performed and magnitudes of all helicity amplitudes are also reported.


pdgid: S040A01
text:
An angular analysis of Lambda_b -->J/psi Lambda decay is performed and a Lambda_{{b}} transverse production polarization of 0.06+-0.07+-0.02 is also reported.


pdgid: S040A39
text:
AAIJ 2022M provides a combined measurement as well as measured alpha_{{gamma}}()- = 1.26+-0.42+-0.20 and alpha_{{gamma}}()+ = 0.55+-0.32+-0.16 for Lambda_{{b}}()0 and Lambdabar_{{b}}()0 separately.


pdgid: S040A13
text:
Indirect determination in kinematic range 2 < pT < 30 GeV/c and 2.1 <eta < 4.5 from production asymmetries of B+, B0 and B_{{s}}()0.


pdgid: B162M
text:
AAIJ 2020Q measures m(Lambda_{{b}}(5912)0) - m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = 292.589+-0.029+-0.010 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B162M
text:
SIRUNYAN 2020K measures m(Lambda_{{b}}(5912)0) - m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = 292.72+-0.12+-0.01 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B162M
text:
Observed in Lambda_b(5912)0 --> Lambda_b()0 pi+ pi- decays with 17.6+-4.8 candidates with a significance of 5.2 sigma.


pdgid: B162M
text:
AAIJ 2012AL measures m(Lambda_{{b}}(5912)0) - m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = 292.60+-0.12+-0.04 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B163M
text:
AAIJ 2020Q measures m(Lambda_{{b}}(5920)0) - m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = 300.492+-0.019+-0.010 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B163M
text:
SIRUNYAN 2020K measures m(Lambda_{{b}}(5920)0) - m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = 300.56+-0.07+-0.01 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B163M
text:
Measured in Lambda_b(5920)0 --> Lambda_b()0 pi+ pi- decays with 17.3+5.3-4.6 events, with a significance of 3.5 sigma.


pdgid: B163M
text:
AALTONEN 2013V measures m(Lambda_{{b}}(5920)0)-m(Lambda_{{b}}()0)-2m(pi) = 20.68+-0.35+-0.30 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = and m(pi) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B163M
text:
Observed in Lambda_b(5920)0 --> Lambda_b()0 pi+ pi- decays with 52.5+-8.1 candidates with a significance of 10.2 sigma.


pdgid: B163M
text:
AAIJ 2012AL measures m(Lambda_{{b}}(5920)0) - m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = 300.40+-0.08+-0.04 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B197M
text:
AAIJ 2020Q measures m(Lambda_{{b}}(6070)0) - m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = 452.7+-2.9+-0.5 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B187M
text:
SIRUNYAN 2020K measures m(Lambda_{{b}}(6146)0) - m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = 526.9+-1.9+-0.8 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B188M
text:
SIRUNYAN 2020K measures m(Lambda_{{b}}(6152)0) - m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = 533.1+-1.1+-0.4 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best value of m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S026M+
text:
Measured using fully reconstructed Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi- and Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+ decays.


pdgid: S026M+
text:
Measured using fully reconstructed Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi- and Lambda_c()+ --> K- pi+ decays.


pdgid: S026M+
text:
Observed four Lambda_b()0 pi+- resonances in the fully reconstructed decay mode Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-, where Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+.


pdgid: S062DM
text:
Observed four Lambda_b()0 pi+- resonances in the fully reconstructed decay mode Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-, where Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+. Assumes mass(Sigma_{{b}}^*()+)-mass(Sigma_{{b}}()+) = mass(Sigma_{{b}}^*()-)-mass(Sigma_{{b}}()-)


pdgid: S069M-
text:
Reconstructed in Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi-, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ decays. Reference Lambda_{{b}}()0 mass 5619.30+-0.34 MeV from AAIJ 2014AA.


pdgid: S069M-
text:
Observed in Xi_b()- --> J/psi Xi- decays with 15.2+-4.4+1.9-0.4 candidates, a significance of 5.5 sigma.


pdgid: S069DML
text:
Reconstructed in Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi-, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ decays.Reference decays Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi- were used.


pdgid: S069DML
text:
Reconstructed in Xi_b()- --> J/psi Lambda K- decays. Reference decays Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi Lambda were used.


pdgid: S069DML
text:
Combination of the original statistically independent measurements of AAIJ 2017BE and AAIJ 2014BJ taking into account correlation between systematic uncertainties.


pdgid: S069DM
text:
Reconstructed in Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi-, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ decays. Uses m(Xi_{{b}}()0) - m(Lambda_{{b}}()0) = 172.44+-0.39+-0.17 MeV from AAIJ 2014Z.


pdgid: S069DM
text:
Derived from measurements in Xi_b()0 --> Xi_c()+ pi- and Xi_b()- --> J/psi Xi- from AALTONEN 2009AP taking correlated systematic uncertainties into account.


pdgid: S069T-
text:
Reconstructed in Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi-, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ decays. Reference Lambda_{{b}}()0 lifetime 1.464+-0.010 ps from PDG 2022.


pdgid: S069T-
text:
Reconstructed in Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi-, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ decays. Reference Lambda_{{b}}()0 lifetime 1.479+-0.009+-0.010 ps from AAIJ 2014U.


pdgid: S069TR1
text:
Reconstructed in Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi-, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ decays. Used Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi- for normalization.


pdgid: S069TR2
text:
Reconstructed in Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi-, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ decays. Uses Xi_{{b}}()0 measurements from AAIJ 2014Z.


pdgid: S069R2
text:
AALTONEN 2009AP reports [G(Xi_b --> J/psi Xi-  x b --> Xi_b()- )/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi(1S) Lambda x B(b --> Lambda_b()0) )] = 0.167+0.037-0.025+-0.012 which we multiply by our best value B(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi(1S) Lambda x B(b --> Lambda_b()0) ) = 5.8+-0.8E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S069R2
text:
ABAZOV 2007K reports [G(Xi_b --> J/psi Xi-  x b --> Xi_b()- )/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi(1S) Lambda x B(b --> Lambda_b()0) )] = 0.28+-0.09+0.09-0.08 which we multiply by our best value B(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi(1S) Lambda x B(b --> Lambda_b()0) ) = 5.8+-0.8E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S069R09
text:
AAIJ 2017BE reports [G(Xi_b --> J/psi Lambda K-  x b --> Xi_b()- )/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi(1S) Lambda x B(b --> Lambda_b()0) )] = 4.19+-0.29+-0.15E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(Lambda_b()0 --> J/psi(1S) Lambda x B(b --> Lambda_b()0) ) = 5.8+-0.8E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S069R08
text:
AAIJ 2017F reports [G(Xi_b --> p K- K-  x bbar --> Xi_b() )/G(total)] / [B(B+ --> K+ K- K+)] / [B(bbar --> B+)] = 2.65+-0.35+-0.47E-3 which we multiply by our best values B(B+ --> K+ K- K+) = 3.40+-0.14E-5, B(bbar --> B+) = 40.8+-0.7E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S069R12
text:
Obtained using the ratio of fragmentation and branching fractions relative to the B- --> K+ K- K- decay.


pdgid: S069R05
text:
Measured in the decay chain of Xi_b()- --> Lambda_b()0 pi-, Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi- and Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi- pi+ pi-, with Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+.


pdgid: S069R05
text:
A signal is reported with a significance of 3.2 standard deviations in the decay chain of Xi_b()- --> Lambda_b()0 pi-, Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-, and Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+.


pdgid: S069R15
text:
AAIJ 2024V reports [G(Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 D_s()- x  x b --> Xi_b()-/ x b --> Lambda_b()0 )/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()-)] = 16.9+-1.3+-4.4E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()-) = 1.10+-0.10E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S069R01
text:
Obtained from an amplitude analysis of quasi-two-body contributions to the Xi_b()- --> R K-  decay, with R --> p K-.


pdgid: S069R04
text:
Obtained from an amplitude analysis of quasi-two-body contributions to the Xi_b()- --> R K- decay, with R --> p K-.


pdgid: S069R14
text:
HAYRAPETYAN 2024R value last uncertainty comes from the uncertainties in the branching fractions of the charmonium states.


pdgid: S070M0
text:
Uses Xi_b()0 --> Xi_c()+ pi- and Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+ decays. The measurement comes from the mass difference of Xi_{{b}}()0 and Lambda_{{b}}()0.


pdgid: S070T0
text:
Uses Xi_b()0 --> Xi_c()+ pi- and Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+ decays. The measurement comes from the value of relative lifetime of Xi_{{b}}()0 to Lambda_{{b}}()0.


pdgid: S070TM0
text:
Uses Xi_{{b}}^*()- and Xi_{{b}}^'()- decays to Xi_b()0 pi-, where Xi_b()0 --> Xi_c()+ pi-, Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+.


pdgid: S070R01
text:
AAIJ 2014H reports [G(Xi_b --> p D0 K-  x bbar --> Xi_b() )/G(total)] / [B(bbar --> b-baryon)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> p D0 K-)] = 0.44+-0.09+-0.06 which we multiply by our best values B(bbar --> b-baryon) = 8.4+-1.1E-2, B(Lambda_b()0 --> p D0 K-) = 4.6+-0.8E-5. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S070R05
text:
AAIJ 2024V reports [G(Xi_b()0 --> Xi_c()+ D_s()- x  x b --> Xi_b()0/ x b --> Lambda_b()0 )/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()-)] = 15.8+-1.1+-7.7E-2 which we multiply by our best value B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ D_s()-) = 1.10+-0.10E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best value.


pdgid: S070R02
text:
AAIJ 2014H reports [G(Xi_b --> Lambda_c()+ K- x bbar --> Xi_b() )/G(Xi_b --> p D0 K-  x bbar --> Xi_b() )] * [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] / [B(D0 --> K- pi+)] = 0.57+-0.22+-0.21 which we multiply or divide by our best values B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.28+-0.32E-2, B(D0 --> K- pi+) = 3.946+-0.030E-2. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S070R12
text:
AAIJ 2018Q reports [G(Xi_b --> p K- pi+ pi-  x b --> Xi_b()0/ x b --> Lambda_b()0)/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] = 6.2+-0.8+-0.2+-0.8E-3 which we multiply by our best values B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.28+-0.32E-2, B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 4.9+-0.4E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S070R13
text:
AAIJ 2018Q reports [G(Xi_b --> p K- K- pi+  x b --> Xi_b()0/ x b --> Lambda_b()0)/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] = 5.6+-0.6+-0.4+-0.5E-3 which we multiply by our best values B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.28+-0.32E-2, B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 4.9+-0.4E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S070R14
text:
AAIJ 2018Q reports [G(Xi_b --> p K- K+ K-  x b --> Xi_b()0/ x b --> Lambda_b()0)/G(total)] / [B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+)] / [B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-)] = 0.57+-0.28+-0.08+-0.10E-3 which we multiply by our best values B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.28+-0.32E-2, B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 4.9+-0.4E-3. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: S070R14
text:
AAIJ 2018Q sees excess with a significance of 2.3sigma. Using B(Lambda_b()0 --> Lambda_c()+ pi-) = 0.430+-0.036E-2 and B(Lambda_c()+ --> p K- pi+) = 6.46+-0.24E-2 the authors set two sided limit [0.11 -- 0.25] at 90% C.L.


pdgid: B169M
text:
AAIJ 2023AU measures m(Xi_{{b}}^'(5935)-) - m(Xi_{{b}}()0) - m(pi-) = 3.66+-0.01+-0.00 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()0) =, m(pi-) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B169M
text:
AAIJ 2015H measures m(Xi_{{b}}^'(5935)-) - m(Xi_{{b}}()0) - m(pi-) = 3.653+-0.018+-0.006 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()0) =, m(pi-) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B161M
text:
HAYRAPETYAN 2024R measures m(Xi_{{b}}(4945)0) - m(Xi_{{b}}()-) - m(pi+-) = 15.810+-0.077+-0.052 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()-) =, m(pi+) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B161M
text:
Measured using Xi_b(5945)0 --> Xi_b()- pi+, Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi-, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+  decays.


pdgid: B161M
text:
AAIJ 2023AU measures m(Xi_{{b}}(5945)0) - m(Xi_{{b}}()-) - m(pi+) = 15.80+-0.02+-0.01 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()-) =, m(pi+) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B161M
text:
AAIJ 2016AE measures m(Xi_{{b}}(5945)0) - m(Xi_{{b}}()-) - m(pi+) = 15.727+-0.068+-0.023 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()-) =, m(pi+) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B161M
text:
CHATRCHYAN 2012S measures m(Xi_{{b}}(5945)0) - m(Xi_{{b}}()-) - m(pi+) = 14.84+-0.74+-0.28 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()-) =, m(pi+) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B161W
text:
Measured using Xi_b(5945)0 --> Xi_b()- pi+, Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi-, Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+ decays.


pdgid: B161R01
text:
HAYRAPETYAN 2024R measures B(Xi_b(5945)0 --> Xi_b()- pi+) x B(b --> Xi_b(5945)0X) / B(b --> Xi_b()-X) = 0.22+-0.02+-0.02.


pdgid: B170M
text:
AAIJ 2023AU measures m(Xi_{{b}}(5955)-) - m(Xi_{{b}}()0) - m(pi-) = 24.27+-0.03+-0.01 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()0) =, m(pi-) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B170M
text:
AAIJ 2015H measures m(Xi_{{b}}(5955)-) - m(Xi_{{b}}()0) - m(pi-) = 24.96+-0.12+-0.06 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()0) =, m(pi-) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B207M
text:
Observed in Xi_b()0 pi+ pi- channel with Xi_b()0 --> Xi_c()+ pi- and Xi_b()0 --> Xi_c()+ pi- pi+ pi- and Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+. Measured as mass difference, listed separately.


pdgid: B207M
text:
AAIJ 2023AU measures m(Xi_{{b}}(6087)0) - m(Xi_{{b}}()0) - 2m(pi+-) = 16.20+-0.20+-0.06 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()0) =, m(pi+-) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B207W
text:
Observed in Xi_b()0 pi+ pi- channel with Xi_b()0 --> Xi_c()+ pi- and Xi_b()0 --> Xi_c()+ pi- pi+ pi- and  Xi_c()+ --> p K- pi+


pdgid: B208M
text:
AAIJ 2023AU measures m(Xi_{{b}}(6095)0) - m(Xi_{{b}}()0) - 2m(pi+-) = 24.32+-0.15+-0.03 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()0) =, m(pi+-) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B200M
text:
Observed in Xi_b()- pi+ pi- channel with Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi- and Xi_b()- --> Xi_c()0 pi- pi+ pi- and Xi_c()0 --> p K- K- pi+.


pdgid: B200M
text:
AAIJ 2023AU measures m(Xi_{{b}}(6100)-) - m(Xi_{{b}}()-) - 2m(pi+-) = 23.60+-0.11+-0.12 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()-) =, m(pi+-) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


pdgid: B200M
text:
SIRUNYAN 2021F measures m(Xi_{{b}}(6100)-) - m(Xi_{{b}}()-) - 2m(pi+-) = 24.14+-0.22+-0.09 MeV. We have adjusted the measurement to our best values of m(Xi_{{b}}()-) =, m(pi+-) =. Our first error is their experiment's error and our second error is the systematic error from using our best values.


